Advertisement

Trees

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Xylem hydraulic safety and efficiency in relation to leaf and wood traits in three temperate Acer species differing in habitat preferences

  • Katja Schumann
  • Christoph Leuschner
  • Bernhard SchuldtEmail author
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Long Distance Transport: Phloem and Xylem

Abstract

Key message

For three widespread European Acer species with different climate envelopes, hydraulic traits, but not wood anatomical or leaf morphological traits, were good indicators for habitat preferences.

Abstract

Prediction of drought impacts on trees requires knowledge about species differences in hydraulic traits and how the hydraulic constitution changes along water availability gradients. We studied co-occurring mature trees of three widespread European Acer species with different climate envelopes and habitat preferences for branch hydraulic (embolism resistance, hydraulic conductivity), wood anatomical (vessel diameter, vessel density, wood density) and leaf functional traits (specific leaf area, sapwood-to-leaf area ratio, foliar δ13C), and branch growth rate. Study objectives were to examine the relation between hydraulic traits and the species’ habitat preferences and to confirm several commonly anticipated trade-offs in hydraulic traits at the genus level. The species’ habitat preferences were reflected in the hydraulic traits, but not in the studied wood anatomical or leaf traits. Embolism resistance (P12, P50 and P88 values) decreased and pit conductivity (potential minus measured conductivity) increased in the sequence A. campestreA. platanoidesA. pseudoplatanus in parallel with the species’ putative drought tolerance. As expected, a trade-off was found between branch hydraulic efficiency and safety. Wood density was related to hydraulic safety, but neither to hydraulic efficiency nor other wood anatomical traits including vessel diameter. Branch growth rate was unrelated to wood density, but linked to vessel diameter and hydraulic conductivity. The findings from the three maple species suggest that hydraulic traits may be under stronger genetic control than leaf and wood anatomical traits that exhibited a more plastic response to the environment. The former are thus better indicators of habitat preferences.

Keywords

Embolism resistance Huber value Hydraulic conductivity Specific leaf area Xylem anatomy Wood density 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ana Sapoznikova for preparing all transverse sections for wood anatomical analyses, and Jürgen Köhler for branch sample collection. The constructive comments by two anonymous reviewers helped to improve the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

468_2019_1874_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (116 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 115 kb)

References

  1. Alder NN, Sperry JS, Pockman WT (1996) Root and stem xylem embolism, stomatal conductance, and leaf turgor in Acer grandidentatum populations along a soil moisture gradient. Oecologia 105:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen CD, Breshears DD, McDowell NG (2015) On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene. Ecosphere 6:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderegg WRL, Berry JA, Smith DD, Sperry JS, Anderegg LDL, Field CB (2012) The roles of hydraulic and carbon stress in a widespread climate-induced forest die-off. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderegg WRL, Klein T, Bartlett M, Sack L, Pellegrini AFA, Choat B, Jansen S (2016) Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality across the globe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:5024–5029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderegg WRL, Meinzer FC (2015) Wood anatomy and plant hydraulics in a changing climate. In: Hacke U (ed) Functional and ecological Xylem anatomy. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  6. Awad H, Barigah T, Badel E, Cochard H, Herbette S (2010) Poplar vulnerability to xylem cavitation acclimates to drier soil conditions. Physiol Plant 139:280–288Google Scholar
  7. Brodribb TJ, Cochard H (2009) Hydraulic failure defines the recovery and point of death in water-stressed conifers. Plant Physiol 149:575–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choat B, Brodie TW, Cobb AR, Zwieniecki MA, Holbrook NM (2006) Direct measurements of intervessel pit membrane hydraulic resistance in two angiosperm tree species. Am J Bot 93:993–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choat B, Sack L, Holbrook NM (2007) Diversity of hydraulic traits in nine Cordia species growing in tropical forests with contrasting precipitation. New Phytologist 175:686–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choat B, Jansen S, Brodribb TJ, Cochard H, Delzon S, Bhaskar R, Bucci SJ, Feild TS, Gleason SM, Hacke UG et al (2012) Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491:752–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlquist S (1977) Ecological factors in wood evolution—floristic approach. Am J Bot 64:887–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cochard H (2002) A technique for measuring xylem hydraulic conductivity under high negative pressures. Plant Plant Cell Environ J 25:815–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cochard H, Casella E, Mencuccini M (2007) Xylem vulnerability to cavitation varies among poplar and willow clones and correlates with yield. Tree Physiol 27:1761–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cochard H, Damour G, Bodet C, Tharwat I, Poirier M, Ameglio T (2005) Evaluation of a new centrifuge technique for rapid generation of xylem vulnerability curves. Physiol Plant 124:410–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corcuera L, Cochard H, Gil-Pelegrin E, Notivol E (2011) Phenotypic plasticity in mesic populations of Pinus pinaster improves resistance to xylem embolism (P50) under severe drought. Trees 25:1033–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dai A (2013) Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat Clim Change 3:52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dietrich L, Hoch G, Kahmen A, Körner C (2018) Losing half the conductive area hardly impacts the water status of mature trees. Sci Rep 8:15006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Domec J-C, Gartner BL (2001) Cavitation and water storage capacity in bole xylem segments of mature and young Douglas-fir trees. Trees 15:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dulamsuren C, Abilova SB, Bektayeva M, Eldarov M, Schuldt B, Leuschner C, Hauck M (2019) Hydraulic architecture and vulnerability to drought-induced embolism in southern boreal tree species of Inner Asia. Tree Physiol 39:463–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Enquist BJ, West GB, Charnov EL, Brown JH (1999) Allometric scaling of production and life history variation in vascular plants. Nature 401:907–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fan Z-X, Zhang S-B, Hao G-Y, Slik JWF, Cao K-F (2012) Hydraulic conductivity traits predict growth rates and adult stature of 40 Asian tropical tree species better than wood density. J Ecol 100:732–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fichot R, Barigah TS, Chamaillard S, Thiec DL, Laurans F, Chochard H, Brignolas F (2010) Common trade-offs between xylem resistance to cavitation and other physiological traits do not hold among unrelated Populus deltoids x Populus nigra hybrids. Plant Cell Environ 33:1553–1568Google Scholar
  23. Fischer EM, Schär C (2008) Future changes in daily summer temperature variability: driving processes and role for temperature extremes. Clim Dyn 33:917–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gleason SM, Butler DW, Ziemińska K, Waryszak P, Westoby M (2012) Stem xylem conductivity is key to plant water balance across Australian angiosperm species. Funct Ecol 26:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gleason SM, Westoby M, Jansen S, Choat B, Hacke UG, Pratt RB, Bhaskar R, Brodribb TJ, Bucci SJ, Cao K-F et al (2016) Weak tradeoff between xylem safety and xylem-specific hydraulic efficiency across the world’s woody plant species. New Phytol 209:123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guet J, Fichot R, Lédée C, Laurans F, Cochard H, Delzon S, Bastien C, Brignolas F (2015) Stem xylem resistance to cavitation is related to xylem structure but not to growth and water-use efficiency at the within-population level in Populus nigra L. J Experim Bot 66:4643–4652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pittermann J (2004) Anaylsis of circular bordered pit function II. Gymnosperm tracheids with torus-margo pit membranes. Am J Bot 91:386–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Wheeler JK, Castro L (2006) Scaling of angiosperm xylem structure with safety and efficiency. Tree Physiol 26:689–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hacke UG, Spicer R, Schreiber SG, Plavcová L (2017) An ecophysiological and developmental perspective on variation in vessel diameter. Plant Cell Environ 40:831–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hajek P, Leuschner C, Hertel D, Delzon S, Schuldt B (2014) Trade-offs between xylem hydraulic properties, wood anatomy and yield in Populus. Tree Physiol 34:744–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hajek P, Kurjak D, von Wühlisch G, Delzon S, Schuldt B (2016) Intraspecific variation in wood anatomical, hydraulic and foliar traits in ten European beech provenances differing in growth yield. Front Plant Sci 7:791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hargrave KR, Kolb KJ, Ewers FW, Davis SD (1994) Conduit diameter and drought-induced embolism in Salvia-Mellifera Greene (Labiatae). New Phytol 126:695–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hartmann H, Ziegler W, Kolle O, Trumbore S (2013) Thirst beats hunger - declining hydration during drought prevents carbon starvation in Norway spruce saplings. New Phytol 200:340–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Herbette S, Wortemann R, Awad H, Huc R, Cochard H, Barigah TS (2010) Insights into xylem vulnerability to cavitation in Fagus sylvatica L.: phenotypic and environmental sources of variability. Tree Physiol 30:1448–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hietz P, Valencia R, Wright SJ (2013) Strong radial variation in wood density follows a uniform pattern in two neotropical rain forests. Funct Ecol 27:684–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoeber S, Leuschner C, Köhler L, Arias-Aguilar D, Schuldt B (2014) The importance of hydraulic conductivity and wood density to growth performance in eight tree species from a tropical semi-dry climate, Forest. Ecol Manag 330:126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CampridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD (2007) Cavitation resistance among 26 chaparral species of southern California. Ecol Monogr 77:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. King DA, Davies SJ, Tan S, Noor NSM (2006) The role of wood density and stem support costs in the growth and mortality of tropical trees. J Ecol 94:670–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kotowska MM, Hertel D, Abou Rajab Y, Barus H, Schuldt B (2015) Patterns in hydraulic architecture from roots to branches in six tropical tree species from cacao agroforestry and their relation to wood density and stem growth. Front Plant Sci 6:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Larter M, Pfautsch S, Domec J-C, Trueba S, Nagalingum N, Delzon S (2017) Aridity drove the evolution of extreme embolism the radiation of conifer genus Callitris. New Phytol 215:97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lens F, Sperry JS, Christman MA, Choat B, Rabaey D, Jansen S (2011) Testing hypotheses that link wood anatomy to cavitation resistance and hydraulic conductivity in the genus Acer. New Phytol 190:709–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leuschner C, Ellenberg H (2017) Ecology of central European forests—vegetation ecology of central Europe, vol I. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li S, Lens F, Espino S, Karimi MK, Schenk HJ, Schmitt M, Schuldt B, Jansen S (2016) Intervessel pit membrane thickness as a key determinant of embolism resistance in angiosperm xylem. IAWA J 37:152–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maherali H, DeLucia EH (2000) Xylem conductivity and vulnerability to cavitation of ponderosa pine growing in contrasting climates. Tree Physiol 20:859–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maherali H, Williams BL, Paige KN, DeLucia EH (2002) Hydraulic differentiation of Ponderosa pine populations along a climate gradient is not associated with ecotypic divergence. Funct Ecol 16:510–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maherali H, Pockman WT, Jackson RB (2004) Adaptive variation in the vulnerability of woody plants to xylem cavitation. Ecology 85:2184–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maherali H, Moura CF, Caldeira MC, Willson CJ, Jackson RB (2006) Functional coordination between leaf gas exchange and vulnerability to xylem cavitation in temperate forest trees. Plant Cell Environ J 29:571–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Markesteijn L, Poorter L, Paz H, Sack L, Bongers F (2011) Ecological differentiation in xylem cavitation resistance is associated with stem and leaf structural traits. Plant Cell Environ 34:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Martínez-Cabrera HI, Schenk HJ, Cevallos-Ferriz SRS, Jones CS (2011) Integration of vessel traits, wood density, and height in angiosperm shrubs and trees. Am J Bot 98:915–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Martínez-Vilalta J, Cochard H, Mencuccini M, Sterck F, Herrero A, Korhonen JFJ, Llorenz P, Nikinmaa E, Nolè A, Poyatos R, Ripullone F, Sass-Klaassen U, Zweifel R (2009) Hydraulic adjustment of Scots pine across Europe. New Phytol 184:353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG et al (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178:719–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Neumann M, Mues V, Moreno A, Hasenauer H, Seidl R (2017) Climate variability drives recent tree mortality in Europe. Global Change Biol 23:4788–4797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ogasa M, Miki NH, Murakami Y, Yoshikawa K (2013) Recovery performance in xylem hydraulic conductivity is correlated with cavitation resistance for temperate deciduous tree species. Tree Physiol 33:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pammenter NW, Vander Willigen C (1998) A mathematical and statistical analysis of the curves illustrating vulnerability of xylem to cavitation. Tree Physiol 18:589–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Poorter L, Mcdonald I, Alarcon A, Fichtler E, Licona J-C, Pena-Claros M et al (2010) The importance of wood traits and hydraulic conductivity for the performance and life history strategies of 42 rainforest tree species. New Phytol 185:481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Poyatos R, Martínez-Vilalta J, Čermák J, Ceulemans R, Granier A, Irvine J, Köstner B, Lagergren F, Meiresonne L, Nadezhdina N, Zimmermann R, Llorens P, Mencuccini M (2007) Plasticity in hydraulic architecture of Scots pine across Europe. Oecologia 153:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rowland L, da Costa ACL, Galbraith DR, Oliveira RS, Binks OJ, Oliveira AAR, Pullen AM, Doughty CE, Metcalfe DB, Vasconcelos SS et al (2015) Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation. Nature 528:119–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Salmon Y, Torres-Ruiz JM, Poyatos R, Martinez-Vilalta J, Meir P, Cochard H, Mencuccini M (2015) Balancing the risks of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation: a twig scale analysis in declining Scots pine. Plant Cell Environ 38:2575–2588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A, Tinner W, Ballian D, Beck P, Birks HJB, Eaton E et al (2016) European atlas of forest tree species. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  61. Schreiber SG, Hacke UG, Chamberland S, Lowe CW, Kamelchuk D, Bräutigam K, Campbell MM, Thomas BR (2016) Leaf size serves as a proxy for xylem vulnerability to cavitation in plantation trees. Plant Cell Environ 39:272–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schuldt B, Knutzen F, Delzon S, Jansen S, Müller-Haubold H, Burlett R, Clough Y, Leuschner C (2016) How adaptable is the hydraulic system of european beeach in the face of climate change-related precipitation reduction. New Phytol 210:443–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Skelton RP, West AG, Dawson TE (2015) Predicting plant vulnerability to drought in biodiverse regions using functional traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:5744–5749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sperry JS, Nichols KL, Sullivan JEM, Eastlack SE (1994) Xylem embolism in ring-porous, diffuse-porous, and coniferous trees of Northern Utah and Interior Alaska. Ecology 75:1736–1752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sterck FJ, Martínez-Vilalta J, Mencuccini M, Cochard H, Gerrits P, Zweifel R, Herrero A, Korhonen JFJ, Llorens P, Nikinmaa E, Nolè A, Poyatos R, Ripullone F, Sass-Klaassen U (2012) Understanding trait interactions and their impacts on growth in Scots pine branches across Europe. Funct Ecol 26:541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tissier J, Lambs L, Peltier J-P, Marigo G (2004) Relationship between hydraulic traits and habitat preference for six Acer species occurring in the French Alps. Ann For Sci 61:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Togashi HF, Prentice IC, Evans BJ, Forrester DI, Drake P, Feikema P, Brooksbank K, Eamus D, Tylor D (2015) Morphological and moisture availability controls of the leaf area-to-sapwood area ratio: analysis of measurements on Australian trees. Ecol Evolut 5:1263–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Torres-Ruiz JM, Cochard H, Fonseca E, Badel E, Gazarini L, Vaz M (2017) Differences in functional and xylem anatomical features allow Cistus species to co-occur and cope differently with drought in the Mediterranean region. Tree Physiol 37:755–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Trifilò P, Casolo V, Raimondo F, Petrussa E, Boscutti F, Lo Gullo MA, Nardini A (2017) Effects of prolonged drought on stem non-structural carbohydrates content and post-drought hydraulic recovery in Laurus nobilis L.: The possible link between carbon starvation and hydraulic failure. Plant Physiol Biochem 120:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tyree MT, Sperry JS (1989) Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism. Ann Rev Plant Biol 40:19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Urli M, Porté AJ, Cochard H, Guengant Y, Burlett R, Delzon S (2013) Xylem embolism threshold for catastrophic hydraulic failure in angiosperm trees. Tree Physiol 33:672–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. White FM (1991) Viscous fluid flow, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Willson CJ, Jackson RB (2006) Xylem cavitation caused by drought and freezing stress in four co-occurring Juniperus species. Physiol Plant 127:374–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Willson CJ, Manos PS, Jackson RB (2008) Hydraulic traits are influenced by phylogenetic history in the drought-resistant, invasive genus Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Am J Bot 95:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yoshimura K, Saiki S-T, Yazaki K, Ogasa MY, Shirai M, Nakano T, Yoshimura J, Ishida A (2016) The dynamics of carbon stored in xylem sapwood to drought-induced hydraulic stress in mature trees. Sci Rep 6:24513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ziemińska K, Butler DW, Gleason SM, Wright IJ, Westoby M (2013) Fibre wall and lumen fractions drive wood density variation across 24 Australian angiosperms. AoB Plants 5:plt046Google Scholar
  78. Zimmermann MH (1983) Xylem structure and the ascent of sap. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katja Schumann
    • 1
  • Christoph Leuschner
    • 1
  • Bernhard Schuldt
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Plant Ecology, Albrecht von Haller Institute for Plant SciencesUniversity of GoettingenGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Julius-von-Sachs-Institute of Biological Sciences, Chair of Ecophysiology and Vegetation EcologyUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations