Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 103–119 | Cite as

Modelling individual tree height–diameter relationships for multi-layered and multi-species forests in central Europe

  • Ram P. SharmaEmail author
  • Zdeněk Vacek
  • Stanislav Vacek
  • Miloš Kučera
Original Article
  • 113 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biomechanics

Abstract

Key message

The proposed height–diameter model applicable to many tree species in the multi-layered and mixed stands across Czech Republic shows a high accuracy in the height prediction. This model can be useful for estimating forest yield and biomass, and simulation of the vertical stand structures.

Abstract

We developed a generalized nonlinear mixed-effects height–diameter (H–D) model applicable to Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and other conifer and broadleaved tree species using the modelling method that includes dummy variables accounting for species-specific height differences and random component accounting for within- and between-sample plot height differences and randomness in the data. We used two large datasets: the first set (model fitting dataset) originated from permanent research sample plots and second set (model-testing dataset) originated from the Czech national forest inventory (NFI) sample plots. The former dataset comprises 224 sample plots with 29,390 trees and the latter dataset comprises 14,903 sample plots with 382,540 trees, each representing wide variabilities of tree size, ecological zone, growth condition, stand structure and development stage, and management regime across the country. Among the four versatile growth functions evaluated as base functions with diameter at breast height (DBH) included as a single predictor, the Chapman-Richards function showed the most attractive fit statistics. This function was then extended through the integration of other predictor variables, which better describe the stand density (stand basal area), stand development and site quality (dominant height), competition (ratio of DBH to quadratic mean DBH), that would act as modifiers of the original parameters of the function. The mixed-effects H–D model described a large part of the variations in the H–D relationships (\(R_{{{\text{adj}}}}^{2}\) = 0.9182; RMSE = 2.7786) without substantial trends in the residuals. Testing this model against model-testing dataset confirmed the model’s high accuracy. The model may be used for estimating forest yield and biomass, and therefore will serve as an important tool for decision making in forestry.

Keywords

Chapman-Richards function National forest inventory Dummy variable modelling Stand density Stand structure Random effects Species-specific height difference 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Czech Ministry of Agriculture (No. QJ1520037), Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (IGA No. B2018, B0318, and Excellent Output 2018), and EXTEMIT-k project (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000433). We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and insightful suggestions.

Author contributions

Ram Sharma: conceptualized and designed the study, performed data analysis and modelling, and wrote and revised the manuscript; Zdeněk Vacek: contributed to data descriptions and produced study area maps, and worked for revision, Stanislav Vacek: provided training dataset and contributed to the manuscript improvement. Miloš Kučera: provided validation dataset and contributed to the manuscript improvement.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

468_2018_1762_MOESM1_ESM.docx (956 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 956 KB)
468_2018_1762_MOESM2_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 19 KB)
468_2018_1762_MOESM3_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 12 KB)

References

  1. Adame P, del Rio M, Canellas I (2008) A mixed nonlinear height–diameter model for Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.). For Ecol Manag 256:88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamec Z (2015) Comparison of linear mixed effects model and generalized model of the tree height–diameter relationship. J For Sci 61:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adamec Z, Drápela K (2015) Generalized additive models as an alternative approach to the modelling of the tree height–diameter relationship. J For Sci 61:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akaike H (1972) A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(6):716–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates DM, Watts DG (1988) Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bollandsås OM, Næsset E (2009) Weibull models for single-tree increment of Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in Norway. Scand J For Res 24:54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borders BE (1989) Systems of equations in forest stand modeling. For Sci 35:548–556Google Scholar
  8. Burkhart H, Tomé M (2012) Modeling forest trees and stands. Springer, 471 pGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Calama R, Montero G (2004) Interregional nonlinear height–diameter model with random coefficients for stone pine in Spain. Can J For Res 34:150–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carmean WH, Lenthall DJ (1989) Height-growth and site-index curves for jack pine in north central Ontario. Can J For Res 19:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castedo-Dorado F, Anta MB, Parresol BR, Gonzalez JGA (2005) A stochastic height–diameter model for maritime pine ecoregions in Galicia (northwestern Spain). Ann For Sci 62:455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castedo-Dorado F, Dieguez-Aranda U, Anta MB, Rodriguez MS, von Gadow K (2006) A generalized height–diameter model including random components for radiata pine plantations in northwestern Spain. For Ecol Manag 229:202–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapman DG (1961) Statistical problems in dynamics of exploited fisheries populations. Neyman J (ed) Proceedings of 4th Berkeley Symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, Berkeley, Vol. 4, pp 153–168Google Scholar
  15. Clutter JL, Fortson JC, Pienaar LV, Brister GH, Bailey RL (1983) Timber management: a quantitative approach. Wiley, New York, 333 pGoogle Scholar
  16. Crecente-Campo F, Tomé M, Soares P, Dieguez-Aranda U (2010) A generalized nonlinear mixed-effects height–diameter model for Eucalyptus globulus L. in northwestern Spain. For Ecol Manag 259:943–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duan G, Gao Z, Wang Q, Fu L (2018) Comparison of different height–diameter modelling techniques for prediction of site productivity in natural uneven-aged pure stands. Forests 9:63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eerikainen K (2003) Predicting the height–diameter pattern of planted Pinus kesiya stands in Zambia and Zimbabwe. For Ecol Manag 175:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eerikäinen K (2009) A multivariate linear mixed-effects model for the generalization of sample tree heights and crown ratios in the Finnish National Forest Inventory. For Sci 55:480–493Google Scholar
  20. Fang Z, Bailey RL (1998) Height–diameter models for tropical forests on Hainan Island in southern China. For Ecol Manag 110:315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. FMI (2003) Inventarizace lesů, Metodika venkovního sběru dat [Forest inventory, field data collection methodology]. Brandýs nad Labem, 136 pGoogle Scholar
  22. FMI (2007) National Forest Inventory in the Czech Republic 2001–2004; Introduction, methods, results. Brandýs nad Labem, 224 pGoogle Scholar
  23. Fu L, Sun H, Sharma RP, Lei Y, Zhang H, Tang S (2013) Nonlinear mixed-effects crown width models for individual trees of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) in south-central China. For Ecol Manag 302:210–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fu L, Sharma RP, Hao K, Tang S (2017a) A generalized interregional nonlinear mixed-effects crown width model for Prince Rupprecht larch in northern China. For Ecol Manag 389:364–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fu L, Sharma RP, Wang G, Tang S (2017b) Modelling a system of nonlinear additive crown width models applying seemingly unrelated regression for Prince Rupprecht larch in northern China. For Ecol Manag 386:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fu L, Zhang H, Sharma RP, Pang L, Wang G (2017c) A generalized nonlinear mixed-effects height to crown base model for Mongolian oak in northeast China. For Ecol Manag 384:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fu L, Li X, Sharma RP (2018) Comparing height–age and height–diameter modelling approaches for estimating site productivity of natural uneven-aged forests. Forestry 91(4):419–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fuller WA (1987) Measurement error models. Wiley, New York, 445 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goelz JCG, Burk TE (1992) Development of a well-behaved site index equation-Jack pine in north central Ontario. Can J For Res 22:776–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gregoire TG, Schabenberger O, Barrett JP (1995) Linear modelling of irregularly spaced, unbalanced, longitudinal data from permanent-plot measurements. Can J For Res 25:137–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hasenauer H, Monserud RA (1996) A crown ratio model for Austrian forests. For Ecol Manag 84:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huang S, Titus SJ (1994) An age-independent individual tree height prediction model for boreal spruce-aspen stands in Alberta. Can J For Res 24:1295–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang S, Price D, Titus J S (2000) Development of ecoregion-based height–diameter models for white spruce in boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 129:125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huang S, Meng SX, Yang Y (2009) Using nonlinear mixed model technique to determine the optimal tree height prediciton model for black spruce. Modern Appl Sci 3:3–18Google Scholar
  35. Huuskonen S, Miina J (2007) Stand-level growth models for young Scots pine stands in Finland. For Ecol Manag 241:49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kangas AS (1998) Effect of errors-in-variables on coefficients of a growth model and on prediction of growth. For Ecol Manag 102:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kučera M (2016) Výstupy NIL2—Zastoupení dřevin a věková struktura Lesa [Outputs of NIL2—representation of tree species and the age structure of forest]. In: Vašíček J, Skála V (eds): XIX. Sněm lesníků. Národní inventarizace lesů 2, Hradec Králové, 37–53Google Scholar
  38. Lawrence M, McRoberts RE, Tomppo E, Gschwantner T, Gabler K (2010) Comparisons of national forest inventories. In: National forest inventories: pathways for common reporting. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lei Y, Parresol BR (2001) Remarks on height–diameter modelling. In: Research Note SRS-10. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, AshevilleGoogle Scholar
  40. Li Y, Deng X, Huang Z, Xiang W, Yan W, Lei P, Zhou X, Peng C (2015) Development and evaluation of models for the relationship between tree height and diameter at breast height for Chinese-Fir plantations in subtropical China. PLoS One 10, e0125118Google Scholar
  41. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute, Cary, 814Google Scholar
  42. Liu M, Feng Z, Zhang Z, Ma C, Wang M, Lian B-l, Sun R, Zhang L (2017) Development and evaluation of height diameter at breast models for native Chinese Metasequoia. PLoS One 12:e0182170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MacPhee C, Kershaw JA, Weiskittel AR, Golding J, Lavigne MB (2018) Comparison of approaches for estimating individual tree height–diameter relationships in the Acadian forest region. For Int J For Res 91:132–146Google Scholar
  44. Mehtatalo L (2005) Height–diameter models for Scots pine and birch in Finland. Silva Fennica 39:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mehtätalo L, de-Miguel S, Gregoire TG (2015) Modeling height–diameter curves for prediction. Can J For Res 45:826–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Monserud RA, Sterba H (1996) A basal area increment model for individual trees growing in even- and uneven-aged forest stands in Austria. For Ecol Manag 80:57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2001) ‘Introduction to linear regression analysis. Wiley, New York, 641 pGoogle Scholar
  48. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nanos N, Calama R, Montero G, Gil L (2004) Geostatistical prediction of height/diameter models. For Ecol Manag 195:221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Omule SAY (1980) Personal bias in forest measurements. The Forestry Chronicle 56:222–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paulo JA, Tomé J, Tomé M (2011) Nonlinear fixed and random generalized height–diameter models for Portuguese cork oak stands. Ann For Sci 68:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peng C (2001) Developing and validating nonlinear height–diameter models for major tree species of Ontario’s boreal forest. North J Appl For 18:87–94Google Scholar
  53. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rencher AC, Schaalje GB (2008) Linear models in statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Richards FJ (1959) A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot 10:290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robinson AP, Wykoff WR (2004) Imputing missing height measures using a mixed-effects modeling strategy. Can J For Res 34:2492–2500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. SAS Institute Inc (2012) SAS/ETS1 9.1.3 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
  58. Saud P, Lynch TB, KC A, Guldin JM (2016) Using quadratic mean diameter and relative spacing index to enhance height–diameter and crown ratio models fitted to longitudinal data. Forestry 89:215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmidt M, Kiviste A, von Gadow K (2011) A spatially explicit height–diameter model for Scots pine in Estonia. Eur J Forest Res 130:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schnute J (1981) A Versatile Growth Model with Statistically Stable Parameters. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:1128–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sharma RP, Breidenbach J (2015) Modeling height–diameter relationships for Norway spruce, Scots pine, and downy birch using Norwegian national forest inventory data. For Sci Technol 11:44–53Google Scholar
  62. Sharma RP, Brunner A (2017) Modeling individual tree height growth of Norway spruce and Scots pine from national forest inventory data in Norway. Scand J For Res 32:501–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sharma M, Parton J (2007) Height–diameter equations for boreal tree species in Ontario using a mixed-effects modeling approach. For Ecol Manag 249:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sharma M, Zhang SY (2004) Height–diameter models using stand characteristics for Pinus banksiana and Picea mariana. Scand J For Res 19:442–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sharma RP, Brunner A, Eid T, Øyen B-H (2011) Modelling dominant height growth from national forest inventory individual tree data with short time series and large age errors. For Ecol Manag 262:2162–2175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sharma RP, Brunner A, Eid T (2012) Site index prediction from site and climate variables for Norway spruce and Scots pine in Norway. Scand J For Res 27:619–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sharma RP, Vacek Z, Vacek S (2016a) Individual tree crown width models for Norway spruce and European beech in Czech Republic. For Ecol Manag 366:208–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sharma RP, Vacek Z, Vacek S (2016b) Nonlinear mixed effect height–diameter model for mixed species forests in the central part of the Czech Republic. J For Sci 62:470–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sharma RP, Vacek Zk, Vacek S (2016c) Modeling individual tree height to diameter ratio for Norway spruce and European beech in Czech Republic. Trees 30:1969–1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sharma RP, Bíllek L, Vacek Z, Vacek S (2017a) Modelling crown widtH–Diameter relationship for Scots pine in the central Europe. Trees 31:1875–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sharma RP, Vacek Z, Vacek S (2017b) Modelling tree crown-to-bole diameter ratio for Norway spruce and European beech. Silva Fennica 51(5):article id 1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sharma RP, Vacek Z, Vacek S, Jansa V (2017c) Modelling individual tree diameter growth for Norway spruce in Czech Republic using generalized algebraic difference approach. J For Sci 63:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sharma RP, Vacek Z, Vacek S, Podrázský V, Jansa V (2017d) Modelling individual tree height to crown base of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). PLoS One 12:e0186394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Short EA III, Burkhart H (1992) Prediction crown-height increment for thinned and unthinned loblolly pine plantations. For Sci 38:594–610Google Scholar
  75. Šmelko ŠS, Merganič J (2008) Some methodological aspects of the national forest inventory and monitoring in Slovakia. J For Sci 54:476–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Soares P, Tomé M (2001) A tree crown ratio prediction equation for eucalypt plantations. Ann For Sci 58:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Temesgen H, Gadow KV (2004) Generalized height–diameter models: an application for major tree species in complex stands of interior British Columbia. Eur J Forest Res 123:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Temesgen H, Monleon VJ, Hann DW (2008) Analysis and comparison of nonlinear tree height prediction strategies for Douglas-fir forests. Can J For Res 38:553–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Temesgen H, Zhang CH, Zhao XH (2014) Modelling tree height–diameter relationships in multi-species and multi-layered forests: a large observational study from Northeast China. For Ecol Manag 316:78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tewari VP, Kishan Kumar VS (2002) Development of top height model and site index curves for Azadirachta indica A. juss. For Ecol Manag 165:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Trincado G, VanderSchaaf CL, Burkhart HE (2007) Regional mixed-effects height–diameter models for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations. Eur J For Res 126:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Uzoh FCC, Oliver WW (2008) Individual tree diameter increment model for managed even-aged stands of ponderosa pine throughout the western United States using a multilevel linear mixed effects model. For Ecol Manag 256:438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vacek S, Bílek L, Schwarz O, Hejcmanová P, Mikeska M (2013) Effect of air pollution on the health status of Spruce stands. Mt Res Dev 33:40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vacek S, Vacek Z, Bilek L, Simon J, Remeš J, Hůnová I, Král J, Putalova T, Mikeska M (2016) Structure, regeneration and growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands with respect to changing climate and environmental pollution. Silva Fennica 50(4):1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vanclay JK (1994) Modelling forest growth and yield. Applications to mixed tropical forests. CAB International, Oxon, 312 pGoogle Scholar
  86. Vargas-Larreta B, Castedo-Dorado F, Alvarez-Gonzalez JG, Barrio-Anta M, Cruz-Cobos F (2009) A generalized height–diameter model with random coefficients for uneven-aged stands in El Salto, Durango (Mexico). For Int J For Res 82:445–462Google Scholar
  87. Vonesh EF, Chinchilli VM (1997) Linear and nonlinear models for the analysis of repeated measurements. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 560 pGoogle Scholar
  88. West PW, Ratkowsky DA, Davis AW (1984) Problems of hypothesis testing of regressions with multiple measurements from individual sampling units. For Ecol Manag 7:207–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yang RC, Kozak A, Smith JHG (1978) The potential of Weibull-type functions as flexible growth curves. Can J For Res 8:424–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zeide B (1989) Accuracy of equations describing diameter growth. Can J For Res 19:1283–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhang L (1997) Cross-validation of non-linear growth functions for modelling tree height–diameter relationships. Ann Bot 79:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Forestry and Wood SciencesCzech University of Life Sciences PraguePrague 6Czech Republic
  2. 2.Forest Management InstituteBrandýs nad Labem-Stará BoleslavCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations