Climatic effects on bud break and frost tolerance in the northernmost populations of Beech (Fagus sylvatica) in Europe
Bud break in European beech is generally known to be under strong photoperiodic control, but our data indicate that bud break in the northernmost populations is temperature limited.
European beech (Fagus sylvatica) is among the dominant tree species in Europe, and is expected to increase its distribution northwards due to climate change. Although spring bud break in European beech is known to be under strong photoperiodic control, studies of populations from high elevations suggest a greater role of temperature in colder environments. This indicates that warming could yield advanced bud break for populations at high elevation and at high latitudes. Using live material collected in winter, spring and autumn from wild populations in Norway, representing the northernmost distribution range of European beech, we tested frost tolerance and effects of temperature and day length on bud break in controlled conditions. Furthermore, we observed bud break during spring in field conditions. Bud break in controlled conditions was faster with later sampling dates and higher temperatures, but showed little or no activity under short photoperiod. Field observations revealed earlier bud break in warmer sites, and remarkably, that bud break dates have advanced by more than 10 days in less than three decades. Frost tolerance tests showed a gradual decrease in bud intactness from January to March, and a gradual increase from October to December. Our data indicate that bud break dates in the northernmost European beech populations are limited by temperature, similar to observations of populations at high elevation in Central Europe. Further warming can thus be expected to yield earlier bud break at the species’ northernmost distribution range, possibly increasing the susceptibility of shoot tips to late spring frost events.
KeywordsBud break Frost tolerance Warming Populus tremula Phenology Temperature
This study was funded by the Research Council of Norway (Grant no. 225018). We wish to thank Ellen Finne at the County Governor of Vestfold for providing help in localising beech stands. We also wish to thank the County Governor of Hordaland and the County Governor of Vestfold for granting permission to collect samples from the nature reserves in Seim (Hordaland) and Holmestrand (Vestfold).
- Christensen RHB (2015) Ordinal—regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2015-01-21. http://www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
- Frazer GW, Canham CD, Lertzman KP (1999) Gap light analyzer (GLA), version 2.0: imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, users manual and program documentation. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia/Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Greer DH, Warrington IJ (1982) Effect of photoperiod, night temperature, and frost incidence on development of frost hardiness in Pinus radiata. Aust J Plant Physiol 9:333–342Google Scholar
- Hultén E (1971) The circumpolar plants. 2, Dicotyledons. Kungl. Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar, 4:13:1. Almqvist Wiksell, Stockholm, p 463Google Scholar
- Kreyling J, Buhk C, Backhaus S, Hallinger M, Huber G, Huber L, Jentsch A, Konnert M, Thiel D, Wilmking M, Beierkuhnlein C (2014) Local adaptations to frost in marginal and central populations of the dominant forest tree Fagus sylvatica L. as affected by temperature and extreme drought in common garden experiments. Ecol Evolut 4:594–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Menzel A, Sparks T, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kübler K, Bissolli P, Braslavská O, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl Å, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatczak K, Måge F, Mestre A, Nordli Ø, Peñuelas J, Pirinen P, Remisová V, Sheifinger H, Stritz M, Susnik A, van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski FE, Zach S, Zust A (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Change Biol 12:1969–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mølmann JA, Asante DK, Jensen JB, Krane MN, Ernstsen A, Junttila O, Olsen JE (2005) Low night temperature and inhibition of GA biosynthesis overrides phytochrome action and induce bud set and cold acclimation, but not dormancy in PHYA overexpressors and wild-type of hybrid aspen. Plant Cell Environ 28:1579–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nihlgård B (1969) The microclimate in a beech and a spruce forest-a comparative study from Kongalund, Scania, Sweden. Botaniska Notiser 122:333–352Google Scholar
- Pignatti S (1982) Flora d’Italia. Edagricole, BolognaGoogle Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2015) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package Version 3:1–122Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Visnjic VC, Dohrenbusch A (2004) Frost resistance and phenology of European beech provenances (Fagus sylvatica L.). Allgemeine Forst Jagdzeitung 175:101–108Google Scholar
- Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 101–142Google Scholar