Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 1247–1252 | Cite as

Reductions in net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance vary with time since leaf detachment in three deciduous angiosperms

  • Martin-Michel Gauthier
  • Douglass F. Jacobs
Short Communication

Abstract

Key message

Compared to in situ measurements, net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance were reduced 3–6 min after leaf detachment in Quercus rubra and Quercus alba, and 9 min after leaf detachment in Juglans nigra.

Abstract

Collecting in situ gas-exchange measurements in canopies of mature trees is challenging, because the crown can be several meters above ground. Thus, we investigated the effect of detaching the leaf from the branch and time since detachment for three deciduous angiosperm species: black walnut (Juglans nigra), northern red oak (Quercus nigra), and white oak (Quercus alba). Results showed that net photosynthesis (A) was significantly reduced 3 min after leaf detachment in Quercus rubra, 6 min after leaf detachment in Q. alba, and 9 min after leaf detachment in J. nigra. Compared to the in situ measurement, a 72 ± 13% reduction (mean ± SE) in A occurred after 3 min in Q. rubra, a 74 ± 27% reduction in A occurred after 6 min in Q. alba, while a 41 ± 14% reduction in A occurred after 9 min in J. nigra. Furthermore, once the significant reduction in A occurred, it was maintained over the remaining time period for each species. Responses for stomatal conductance were similar to those of A. Results highlight the importance of measuring gas exchange in situ whenever possible. Otherwise, these results provide threshold time periods to carry out instantaneous gas-exchange measurements in the field for select hardwood species in which the canopy is difficult to access.

Keywords

Tree physiology Leaf detachment Leaf excision In situ gas exchange Net photosynthesis Stomatal conductance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by the Fred M. van Eck Foundation of the Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center and the Department of Forestry and Natural Resources at Purdue University. Marie-Claude Lambert provided assistance with statistical analyses. Comments and suggestions from reviewers helped improve the quality of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no potential conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial).

References

  1. Bassow SL, Bazzaz FA (1998) How environmental conditions affect canopy leaf level photosynthesis in four deciduous tree species. Ecology 79:2660–2675.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2660:HECACL]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bréda N, Granier A, Aussenac G (1995) Effects of thinning on soil and tree water relations, transpiration, and growth in an oak forest (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.). Tree Physiol 15:295–306.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/15.5.295 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carpenter SB, Smith ND (1975) Stomatal distribution and size in southern Appalachian hardwoods. Can J Bot 53:1153–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b75-137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen L, Tong J, Xiao J, Ruan Y, Liu J, Zeng M, Huang H, Wang J-W, Xu L (2016) YUCCA-mediated auxin biogenesis is required for cell fate transition occurring during de novo root organogenesis in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 67:4273–4284.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw213 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Dang Q-L, Margolis HA, Coyea MR, Sy M, Collatz GJ (1997) Regulation of branch-level gas exchange of boreal trees: roles of shoot water potential and vapor pressure difference. Tree Physiol 17:521–535.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.8-9.521 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Drake PL, Froend RH, Franks PJ (2013) Smaller, faster stomata: scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance. J Exp Bot 64:495–505.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers347 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Gauthier M-M, Jacobs DF (2009) Short-term physiological responses of black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) to plantation thinning. For Sci 55:221–229.  https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/55.3.221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gauthier M-M, Jacobs DF (2010) Ecophysiological responses of black walnut (Juglans nigra) to plantation thinning along a vertical canopy gradient. For Ecol Manag 259:867–874.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Havaux M (1992) Stress tolerance of photosystem II in vivo. Plant Physiol 100:424–432.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.100.1.424 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Hetherington AM, Woodward FI (2003) The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424:901–908.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01843 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirasawa T, Wakabayashi K, Touya S, Ishihara K (1995) Stomatal responses to water deficits and abscisic acid in leaves of sunflower plants (Helianthus annuus L.) grown under different conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 36:955–964.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078866 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaniuga Z, Sochanowicz B, Zabek J, Krzystyniak K (1978) Photosynthetic apparatus in chilling sensitive plants. I. Reactivation of Hill reaction activity inhibited on the cold and dark storage of detached leaves and intact plants. Planta 140:121–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384910 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Katz E, Riov J, Weiss D, Goldschmidt EE (2005) The climacteric-like behaviour of young, mature and wounded citrus leaves. J Exp Bot 56:1359–1367.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri137 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kelly G, Lugassi N, Belausov E, Wolf D, Khamaisi B, Brandsma D, Kottapalli J, Fidel L, Ben-Zvi B, Egbaria A, Acheampong AK, Zheng C, Or E, Distelfeld A, David-Schwartz R, Carmi N, Granot D (2017) The Solanum tuberosum KST1 partial promoter as a tool for guard cell expression in multiple plant species. J Exp Bot 68:2885–2897.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx159 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Kenzo T, Ichie T, Watanabe Y, Yoneda R, Ninomiya I, Koike T (2006) Changes in photosynthesis and leaf characteristics with tree height in five dipterocarp species in a tropical rain forest. Tree Physiol 26:865–873.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/26.7.865 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim C-Y, Bove J, Assmann SM (2008) Overexpression of wound-responsive RNA-binding proteins induces leaf senescence and hypersensitive-like cell death. New Phytol 180:57–70.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02557.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kleiner KW, Abrams MD (1992) The impact of water and nutrient deficiencies on the growth, gas exchange and water relations of red oak and chestnut oak. Tree Physiol 11:271–287.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/11.3.271 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Koike T, Sakagami Y (1984) Examination of methods of measuring photosynthesis with detached parts of three species of birch in Hokkaido. J Jpn Soc For 66:337–340.  https://doi.org/10.11519/jjfs1953.66.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. L’Hirondelle SJ, Addison PA, Huebert DB (1986) Growth and physiological responses of aspen and jack pine to intermittent SO2 fumigation episodes. Can J Bot 64:2421–2427.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b86-322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loewenstein NJ, Pallardy SG (1998) Drought tolerance, xylem sap abscisic acid and stomatal conductance during soil drying: a comparison of canopy trees of three temperate deciduous angiosperms. Tree Physiol 18:431–439.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/18.7.431 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lim PO, Lee IC, Kim J, Kim HJ, Ryu JS, Woo HR, Nam HG (2010) Auxin response factor 2 (ARF2) plays a major role in regulating auxin-mediated leaf longevity. J Exp Bot 61:1419–1430.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. McCament CL, McCarthy BC (2005) Two-year response of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) seedlings to shelterwood harvesting and fire in a mixed-oak ecosystem. Can J For Res 35:740–749.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x05-002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meir P, Grace J, Miranda AC (2001) Leaf respiration in two tropical rainforests: constraints on physiology by phosphorus, nitrogen and temperature. Funct Ecol 15:378–387.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2001.00534.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitchell KA, Bolstad PV, Vose JM (1999) Interspecific and environmentally induced variation in foliar dark respiration among eighteen southeastern deciduous tree species. Tree Physiol 19:861–870.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/19.13.861 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Percival GC, Sheriffs CN (2002) Identification of drought-tolerant woody perennials using chlorophyll fluorescence. J Aboric 28:215–223Google Scholar
  26. Potvin C (1985) Effect of leaf detachment on chlorophyll fluorescence during chilling experiments. Plant Physiol 78:883–886.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.78.4.883 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Powles JA, Buckley TN, Nicotra AB, Farquhar GD (2006) Dynamics of stomatal water relations following leaf excision. Plant Cell Environ 29:981–992.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01491.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Shinde S, Dhiraj N, Cumming JR (2018) Carbon allocation and partitioning in Populus tremuloides are modulated by ectomycorrhizal fungi under phosphorus limitation. Tree Physiol 38:52–65.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx117 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Smillie RM, Hetherington SE (1983) Stress tolerance and stress-induced injury in crop plants measured by chlorophyll fluorescence in vivo. Chilling, freezing, ice cover, heat, and high light. Plant Physiol 72:1043–1050.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.72.4.1043 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Teskey RO, Grier CC, Hinkley TM (1984) Changes in photosynthesis and water relations with age and season in Abies amabilis. Can J For Res 14:77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x84-015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Westfall PH, Tobias RD, Wolfinger RD (2011) Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using SAS, 2nd edn. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  32. Yoder BJ, Ryan MG, Waring RH, Schoettle AW, Kaufmann MR (1994) Evidence of reduced photosynthetic rates in old trees. For Sci 40:513–527.  https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/40.3.513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration CenterPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.GatineauCanada

Personalised recommendations