Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 1043–1059 | Cite as

Genetic relationship of rough lemon landraces and under-utilised citrus genotypes from North-East India revealed by SSR and RAPD markers

  • Rakesh Sanabam
  • Nandeibam Samarjit Singh
  • Dinabandhu Sahoo
  • Huidrom Sunitibala Devi
Original Article
  • 221 Downloads

Abstract

Key message

The study has unraveled the genetic relationship of under-utilised citrus varieties with rough lemons and found new insights into the development of suitable rootstocks for promoting citriculture in North-East India.

Abstract

Citrus resources of North-East India represent an invaluable source of various agronomic traits to breed new cultivars and rootstocks having adaptability to the agro-climatic conditions of the region. Lack of scientific approaches and resources towards identification and conservation of unique varieties of Citrus, destruction of natural habitats and absence of adequate information on the genetic relationship of existing citrus forms have resulted in the decline of citrus diversity in NE India. A total of 18 citrus genotypes of rough lemon strains and other under-utilized Citrus spp. collected from the region have been characterised using 22 SSR and 29 RAPD markers. The markers grouped the citrus genotypes into clusters of rough lemon, an acidic citrus group of lemon or natural hybrids and a small cluster of three genotypes. Polymorphic information content values of the SSR markers ranged from 0.481 to 0.90 and 0.26 to 0.45 in the case of RAPD markers. Similarity coefficient value ranged from 0.504 to 0.855 in RAPD while it varied from 0.299 to 0.723 in the case of SSR. C. assamensis along with two other Citrus genotypes grouped with a rough lemon cluster in SSR while shows genetic affinity with the acidic citrus group in RAPD analysis. Citrus indica was observed to be genetically distant from other citrus groups in both the marker systems studied. Grouping of related citrus forms and study of their genetic relationship will be of immense value for conservation and utilization of the region’s rich citrus resources.

Keywords

Citrus Germplasm Rootstock Landrace Genetic relationship 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Director, Institute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development, Takyelpat, Imphal for providing research facilities. The assistance rendered by Mr. K.Sanjit Singh, Lab Attendant, PTC Lab, IBSD is gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  1. Allario T, Brumos J, Colmenero-Flores JM, Tadeo F, Froelicher Y, Talon M, Navarro L, Ollitrault P, Morillon R (2011) Large changes in anatomy and physiology between diploid Rangpur lime (Citrus limonia) and its autotetraploid are not associated with large changes in leaf gene expression. J Exp Bot 62:2507–2519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allario T, Brumos J, Colmenero-Flores JM, Iglesias DJ, Pina JA, Navarro L (2013) Tetraploid Rangpur lime rootstock increases drought tolerance via enhanced constitutive root abscisic acid production. Plant Cell Environ 36:856–868CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbona V, Gómez-Cadenas A (2008) Hormonal modulation of citrus responses to flooding. J Plant Growth Regul 27:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkley NA, Roose ML, Krueger RR, Federici CT (2006) Assessing genetic diversity and population structure in a Citrus germplasm collection utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs). Theor Appl Genet 112:1519–1531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya SC, Dutta S (1956) Classification of Citrus fruits of Assam, Sc. Monogr. 20. ICAR, New Delhi, p 110Google Scholar
  6. Carpena-Artes O, Moreno JJ, Lucena JJ, Carpena-Ruiz RO (1995) Response to iron chlorosis of different hydroponically grown citrus varieties. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 147–151Google Scholar
  7. Castle WS (1987) Citrus rootstocks. In: Rom RC, Carlson RF (eds) Rootstocks for fruit crops. Wiley, New York, pp 361–399Google Scholar
  8. Corazza-Nunes MJ, Machado MA, Nunes WMC, Cristofani M, Targon MLPN. (2002) Assessment of genetic variability in grapefruits (Citrus paradise Macf.) and pummelos (C. maxima (Burm.) Merr.) using RAPD and SSR markers. Euphytica 126:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Das A, Sarkar J, Mondal B, Chaudhury S (2004) Genetic diversity analysis of citrus cultivars and rootstocks of Northeastern India by RAPD markers. Indian J Genet 64(4):281–285Google Scholar
  10. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) A rapid total DNA preparation procedure for fresh plant tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  11. Fang DQ, Roose ML, Krueger RR, Federici CT (1977) Fingerprinting trifoliate orange germ plasm accessions with isoenzymes, RFLPs, and inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Theor Appl Genet 95:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Federici CT, Fang DQ, Scora RW, Roose ML (1998) Phylogenetic relationship within the genus Citrus (Rutaceae) and related genera as revealed by RFLP and RAPD analysis. Theory Appl Genet 96:812–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferguson JJ, Garnsey SM (1993) Citrus virus and viruses-like diseases. Univ. of Florida, Florida Coop. Ext. Serv. Circ. 1131Google Scholar
  14. Garcia-Lor A, Luro F, Navarro L, Ollitrault P (2012) Comparative use of InDel and SSR markers in deciphering the interspecific structure of cultivated citrus genetic diversity: a perspective for genetic association studies. Mol Genet Genom 287(1):77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghosh SP (1977) Citrus industry of north east India. Punjab Hort J 17:13–21Google Scholar
  16. Gjamovski V, Kiprijanovski M (2011) Influence of nine dwarfing apple rootstocks on vigour and productivity of apple cultivar “Granny Smith”. Sci Hortic 129:742–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Golein B, Bigonah M, Azadvar M, Golmohammadi M (2012) Analysis of genetic relationship between ‘Bakraee’ (Citrus sp.) and some known citrus genotypes through SSR and PCR-RFLP markers. Sci Hortic 148:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grosser JW, Ollitrault P, Olivares-Fuster O (2000) Somatic hybridization in citrus: an effective tool to facilitate variety improvement. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 36:434–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grosser JW, Graham JH, McCoy CW, Hoyte A, Rubio HM, Bright DB, Chandler JL (2003) Development of “tetrazyg” rootstocks tolerant of the diaprepes/phytophthora complex under greenhouse conditions. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc 116:262–267Google Scholar
  20. Gulsen O, Roose ML (2001) Lemons: diversity and relationships with selected Citrus genotypes as measured with nuclear genome markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 126:309–317Google Scholar
  21. Handa T, Ishizawa Y, Oogaki C (1986) Phylogenetic study of Fraction I protein in the genus Citrus and its close related genera. Jpn J Genet 61:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardy S, Barkley P, Creek A, Donovan N (2012) Impacts and management of flooding and waterlogging in citrus orchards. NSW Government, (Primefact 1189). http://www.industry.nsw.gov.au/publications. Accessed 2 June 2017
  23. Hazarika TK (2012) Citrus genetic diversity of north-east India, their distribution, ecogeography and ecobiology. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:1267–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hussain S, Curk F, Dhuique-Mayer C, Urban L, Ollitrault P, Luro F, Morillon R (2012) Autotetraploid trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) rootstocks do not impact clementine quality but reduce fruit yields and highly modify rootstock/scion physiology. Sci Hortic 134:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jena SN, Kumar S, Nair NK (2009) Molecular phylogeny in Indian Citrus L. (Rutaceae) inferred through PCR-RFLP and trnL-trnF sequence data on chloroplast DNA. Sci Hortic 119:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kijas JMH, Fowler JCS, Thomas MR (1995) An evaluation of sequence-tagged microsatellite-site markers for genetic analysis within Citrus and related species. Genome 38:349–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar S, Nair KN, Jena SN (2013) Molecular differentiation in Indian Citrus L. (Rutaceae) inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence analysis. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60:59–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mabberley DJ (2004) Citrus (Rutaceae): a review of recent advances in etymology, systematics and medical applications. Blumea 49:481–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malik MN, Scora RW, Soost RK (1974) Studies on the origin of lemon. Hilgardia 42:361–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marak C, Laskar MA (2010) Analysis of phonetic relationship between Citrus indica Tanaka and a few commercially important Citrus species by ISSR marker. Sci Hortic 124:345–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nair KN, Nayar MP (1997) Rutaceae. In: Hajra PK, Nair VJ, Daniel P (eds) Flora of India, vol IV. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, pp 229–407Google Scholar
  32. Nicolosi E, Deng ZN, Gentile A, Malfa SL, Ciotinella G, Tribulato E (2000) Citrus phylogeny and genetic origin of important species as investigated by molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 100:1155–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pandey A, Tomer AK, Bhandri DC, Pareek SK (2008) Towards collection of wild relatives of crop plants in India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55(2):187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rao MN, Soneji JR, Chen C, Huang S, Gmitter FG (2008) Characterisation of zygotic and nucellar seedlings from sour orange-like citrus rootstock candidates using RAPD and EST-SSR markers. Tree Genet Genomes 4(1):113–124Google Scholar
  35. Rohlf FJ (2005) NTSYSpc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.2. Exeter Software, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Saleh B, Allario T, Dambier D, Ollitrault, Morillon R (2008) Tetraploid citrus rootstocks are more tolerant to salt stress than diploid. Comptes Rendus Biol 331:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schäfer G, Bastianel M, Dornelles ALC (2001) Porta-enxertos utilizados na citricultura. Ciê Rural Santa Maria 31(4):723–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sharma BD, Hore DK, Gupta SK (2004) Genetic resources of Citrus of north-eastern India and their potential use. Genet Resour Crop Evol 51:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Siragusa M, De Pasquale F, Abbate L, Tusa N (2006) Identification of sour orange accessions and evaluation of their genetic variability by molecular marker analyses. Hortic Sci 41(1):84–89Google Scholar
  40. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  41. Soost R, Cameron J, Janick J, Moore J (1975) Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University Press, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  42. Swingle WT (1943) The botany of Citrus and its relatives of the orange subfamily Aurantioidae of the family Rutaceae. In: Webber HJ, Batcheler LD (eds) The Citrus industry, vol 1. University of California, Berkley, pp 129–474Google Scholar
  43. Swingle WT, Reece PC (1967) The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor LD (eds) The Citrus industry, vol 1. University of California, Berkeley, pp 190–430Google Scholar
  44. Syvertsen JP (1981) Hydraulic conductivity of four commercial citrus rootstocks. J Am Soc Hort Sci 106:378–381Google Scholar
  45. Syvertsen JP, Lloyd J (1994) Citrus. In: Schaffer B, Andersen PC (eds) Handbook of environmental physiology of fruit crops, vol. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 65–99Google Scholar
  46. Tanaka T (1928) On certain new species of Citrus. Stud Citrol 2:155–164Google Scholar
  47. Tanaka T (1977) Fundamental discussion of Citrus classification. Stud Citrol 14:1–6Google Scholar
  48. Tworkoski T, Miller S (2007) Rootstock effect on the growth of apple scions with different growth habits. Sci Hortic 111:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vu JCV, Yelenosky G (1987) Photosynthetic characteristics in leaves of ‘Valencia’ orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) grown under high and low temperature regimes. Environ Exp Bot 27:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yu Q, Chen C, Du D, Huang M, Yao J, Yu F, Brlansky RH, Gimitter FG (2017) Reprogramming of a defense signaling pathway in rough lemon and sweet orange is a critical element of the early response to ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’. Hortic Res (4):17063.  https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.63

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rakesh Sanabam
    • 1
  • Nandeibam Samarjit Singh
    • 1
  • Dinabandhu Sahoo
    • 1
  • Huidrom Sunitibala Devi
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development (IBSD)ImphalIndia

Personalised recommendations