Quality improvement in pediatric nephrology—a practical guide
Improving quality of care delivery is an important focus for all practicing physicians. Frontline clinicians are in a great position to identify clinical problems and find innovative solutions. The current review describes the method used for quality improvement based on the Model for Improvement, a structural framework to guide improvement work. At its basis are three fundamental questions: What are we trying to accomplish? How will I know that a change will lead to improvement? And what changes could we make that will result in improvement? This preparation phase aims to identify and understand the problem, choose an intervention, and determine reliable measures to gauge improvement. The intervention is then tested using PLAN-DO-STUDY-ACT (PDSA) cycles, an iterative approach to systematically improve processes and outcomes. PLAN focuses on defining the goal of the cycle and describing in details what will be done. DO concentrates on the concrete application of the plan. STUDY focuses on data analyses as ACT identifies lessons learned from the cycle and orientate the goals of the following PDSA cycle. Learning from each cycle, developing an interdisciplinary team and repeated interventions are core principles involved in implementing a sustainable quality improvement program. The Model for Improvement will be illustrated by a common quality problem in pediatric nephrology.
KeywordsQuality improvement Model for improvement Pediatric nephrology Vaccination
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.(2000) In: Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds) To err is human: building a safer health system, Washington (DC)Google Scholar
- 2.Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, Etchells E, Ghali WA, Hebert P, Majumdar SR, O'Beirne M, Palacios-Derflingher L, Reid RJ, Sheps S, Tamblyn R (2004) The Canadian adverse events study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 170:1678–1686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Services USDoHaH (2011) National strategy for quality improvement in health care. In: Services USDoHaH (ed) p 27Google Scholar
- 11.(2001) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, Washington (DC)Google Scholar
- 14.Ogrinc GSHL, Moore SM, Barton AJ, Dolansky MA, Madigosky WS (2012) In: Improvement IfH (ed) Fundamentals of health care improvement: a guide to improving your patient’s care. Joint Commission, Oak Brook TerraceGoogle Scholar
- 15.Provost LPMS (2011) The health care data guide: learning from data for improvement. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 20.Chi C PP, Pilishvili T, Moore M, Murphy T, Strikas R (2012) Guidelines for vaccinating dialysis patients and chronic kidney disease patients—recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/downloads/dialysis-guide-2012.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2017
- 21.Collins AJ, Foley RN, Chavers B, Gilbertson D, Herzog C, Johansen K, Kasiske B, Kutner N, Liu J, St Peter W, Guo H, Gustafson S, Heubner B, Lamb K, Li S, Li S, Peng Y, Qiu Y, Roberts T, Skeans M, Snyder J, Solid C, Thompson B, Wang C, Weinhandl E, Zaun D, Arko C, Chen SC, Daniels F, Ebben J, Frazier E, Hanzlik C, Johnson R, Sheets D, Wang X, Forrest B, Constantini E, Everson S, Eggers P, Agodoa L (2012) United States renal data system 2011 annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease & end-stage renal disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 59(A7):e1–420Google Scholar
- 22.Langley GJ, Moen RD, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP (2009) The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. Jossey-Bass Pub, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 36.Birkinshaw J, Haas JB (2016) Increase your return on failure. Harv Bus Rev https://hbr.org/2016/05/increase-your-return-on-failure. Accessed 04 Jan 2018