Advertisement

A momentum-consistent stabilization algorithm for Lagrangian particle methods in the thermo-mechanical friction drilling analysis

  • Xiaofei PanEmail author
  • C. T. Wu
  • Wei Hu
  • Youcai Wu
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper introduces a new stabilization algorithm to Lagrangian particle methods for the coupled thermal mechanical analysis in the friction drilling simulation. Different from the conventional penalty method which utilizes a direct smoothing of velocity fields in the weak formulation, the proposed algorithm introduces the smoothed velocity fields through linear momentum equations for stabilization. Particle approximations are used for the discretization of coupled thermal mechanical discrete equations. The coupled system is solved by the explicit and staggered time marching scheme. In comparison to the conventional penalty method which requires at least one extra integration point for stabilization, the proposed algorithm needs only one integration point per particle in computation. The essential features of linear and angular momentum conservations are preserved in the explicit dynamic analysis. A bridging scheme is also developed to couple the particle formulation with finite element formulation for practical industrial applications. Several benchmark tests are performed to examine the effectiveness of this new method. Furthermore, a friction drilling application is studied, and the results are compared with the experimental data.

Keywords

Particle formulation Stabilization Direct nodal integration (DNI) Momentum-consistent (MC) Thermal mechanical 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. John O. Hallquist of LSTC for his support to this research. The support from Ford Motor Company is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Miller SF, Shih AJ, Blau PJ (2005) Microstructural alterations associated with friction drilling of steel, aluminum, and titanium. J Mater Eng Perform 15:647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller SF, Shih AJ (2007) Thermo-mechanical finite element modeling of the friction drilling process. J Manuf Sci Eng 129:531–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B, Elkhodary KI (2014) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures, 2nd edn. Wiley, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raju BP, Swamy MK (2012) Finite element simulation of a friction drilling procedure using Deform-3D. Int J Eng Res Technol 2:716–721Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gopichand A, Brahmam MV, Bhanuprakash D (2014) Numerical simulation and analysis of friction drilling process for aluminum alloy using Ansys. Int J Eng Res Technol 3:602–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buffa G, Hua J, Shivpuri R, Fratini L (2006) A continuum based fem model for friction stir welding—model development. Mater Sci Eng, A 419:389–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyghani B, Awang MB, Emamian SS, Mohd Nor MKB, Pedapati SR (2017) A comparison of different finite element methods in the thermal analysis of friction stir welding (FSW). Metals 7(10):450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen JS, Pan C, Wu CT, Liu WK (1996) Reproducing kernel particle methods for large deformation analysis of non-linear structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139:195–227MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T (2004) Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61:2316–2343CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simkins DC, Li S (2006) Meshfree simulation of thermo-mechanical ductile fracture. Comput Mech 38:235–249CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li S, Liu WK (2004) Meshfree particle method. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang DD, Chen JS (2004) Locking free stabilized conforming nodal integration for meshfree Mindlin-Reissner plate formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1065–1083CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ (1977) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics—theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon Not R Astron Soc 181:375–389CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lucy LB (1977) A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. Astron J 82:1013–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Libersky LD, Petschek AG (1990) Smooth particle hydrodynamics with strength of materials. Lect Notes Phys 395:248–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shadloo MS, Oger G, Touzé DL (2016) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for fluid flows, towards industrial applications: motivations, current state, and challenges. Comput Fluid 136:11–34MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Swegle W, Hicks DL, Attaway SW (1995) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis. Comput Mech 116:123–134MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Belytschko T, Guo Y, Liu WK, Xiao SP (2000) A unified stability analysis of meshless particle methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 48:1359–1400MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu CT, Ma N, Takada K, Okada H (2016) A meshfree continuous-discontinuous approach for the ductile fracture modeling in explicit dynamics analysis. Comput Mech 58:391–409MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T, Xiao SP (2004) Stable particle methods based on Lagrangian kernels. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1035–1063MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dyka CT, Randles PW, Ingel RP (1997) Stress points for tension instability in SPH. Int J Numer Methods Eng 40:2325–2341CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beissel S, Belytschko T (1996) Nodal integration of the element-free Galerkin method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139:49–74MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu CT, Koishi M, Hu W (2016) A displacement smoothing induced strain gradient stabilization for the meshfree Galerkin nodal integration method. Comput Mech 56:19–37MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hillman M, Chen JS (2016) An accelerated, convergent, and stable nodal integration in Galerkin meshfree methods for linear and nonlinear mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 107:603–630MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen JS, Wu CT, Yoon S, You Y (2001) A stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin Meshfree methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:435–466CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hillman M, Chen JS, Chi SW (2014) Stabilized and variationally consistent nodal integration for meshfree modeling of impact problems. Comput Particle Mech 1:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guan PC, Chen JS, Wu Y, Tang H, Gaidos J, Hofstetter K, Alsaleh M (2009) Semi-Lagrangian reproducing kernel formulation and application to modeling earth moving operations. Mech Mater 41:670–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu CT, Chi SW, Koishi M, Wu Y (2016) Strain gradient stabilization with dual stress points for the meshfree nodal integration method in inelastic analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 107:3–30CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wu CT, Wu Y, Crawford JE, Magallanes JM (2017) Three-dimensional concrete impact and penetration simulations using the smoothed particle Galerkin method. Int J Impact Eng 106:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen JS, Zhang X, Belytschko T (2014) An implicit gradient model by a reproducing kernel strain regularization in strain localization problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:2827–2844CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu CT, Wu Y, Liu Z, Wang D (2018) A stable and convergent Lagrangian particle method with multiple nodal stress points for large strain and material failure analyses in manufacturing processes. Finite Elem Anal Des 146:96–106MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 83:1526–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wu CT, Bui TQ, Wu YC, Luo TL, Wang M, Liao CC, Chen PY, Lai YS (2018) Numerical and experimental validation of a particle Gakerkin method for metal grinding simulation. Comput Mech 61(365):383zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Felippa CA, Park KC (1980) Staggered transient analysis procedures for coupled dynamic systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 26:61–112CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hughes TJR (2000) The finite element method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffszbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hallquist JO (2006) LS-DYNA® keyword user’s manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, LivermoreGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu WK, Chen Y (1995) Wavelet and multiple scale reproducing kernel particle methods. Int J Numer Methods Fluid Dyn 21:901–931CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liu WK, Uras RA, Chen Y (1997) Enrichment of the finite element method with reproducing kernel particle method. J Appl Mech 135:143–166zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Belytschko T, Organ D, Krongauz Y (1995) A coupled finite element-element-free Galerkin method. Comput Mech 17:186–195MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sulsky D, Schreyer HL (1996) Axisymmetric form of the material point method with application to upsetting and Taylor impact problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139:409–429CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Johnson GR, Holmquist TJ (1988) Evaluation of Cylinder-impact test data for constitutive model constants. J Appl Phys 64:3901–3910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Krasauskas P, Kilikevičius S, Česnavičius R, Pačenga D (2014) Experimental analysis and numerical simulation of the stainless AISI 304 steel friction drilling process. Mechanika 20:590–595Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chow HM, Lee SM, Yang LD (2018) Machining characteristic study of friction drilling on AISI 304 stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 207:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lee SM, Chow HM, Huang FY, Yan BH (2009) Friction drilling of austenitic stainless steel by uncoated and PVD AlCrN- and TiAlN-coated tungsten carbide tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on ballistics (1983), pp 541–547, The Hague, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Belytschko T, Lu YY, Gu L (1994) Element-free Galerkin Methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 37:229–256MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liu WK, Jun S, Li S, Adee J, Belytschko T (1995) Reproducing kernel particle methods for structural dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 38:1655–1679MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computational and Multiscale Mechanics GroupLivermore Software Technology CorporationLivermoreUSA

Personalised recommendations