Influence of stochastic geometric imperfections on the load-carrying behaviour of thin-walled structures using constrained random fields

Original Paper
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Since structural engineering requires highly developed and optimized structures, the thickness dependency is one of the most controversially debated topics. This paper deals with stability analysis of lightweight thin structures combined with arbitrary geometrical imperfections. Generally known design guidelines only consider imperfections for simple shapes and loading, whereas for complex structures the lower-bound design philosophy still holds. Herein, uncertainties are considered with an empirical knockdown factor representing a lower bound of existing measurements. To fully understand and predict expected bearable loads, numerical investigations are essential, including geometrical imperfections. These are implemented into a stand-alone program code with a stochastic approach to compute random fields as geometric imperfections that are applied to nodes of the finite element mesh of selected structural examples. The stochastic approach uses the Karhunen–Loève expansion for the random field discretization. For this approach, the so-called correlation length \(l_c\) controls the random field in a powerful way. This parameter has a major influence on the buckling shape, and also on the stability load. First, the impact of the correlation length is studied for simple structures. Second, since most structures for engineering devices are more complex and combined structures, these are intensively discussed with the focus on constrained random fields for e.g. flange–web-intersections. Specific constraints for those random fields are pointed out with regard to the finite element model. Further, geometrical imperfections vanish where the structure is supported.

Keywords

Finite-element-method Constrained random fields Geometric imperfections Karhunen–Loève expansion Monte-Carlo-simulation Stability loads 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Koiter W (1970) The stability of elastic equilibrium. Tech. rep., DTIC documentGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thompson J, Hunt G (1973) A general theory of elastic stability, vol 5. Wiley, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stefanou G (2009) The stochastic finite element method: past, present and future. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(9):1031–1051CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Argyris J, Papadrakakis M, Stefanou G (2002) Stochastic finite element analysis of shells. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(41):4781–4804CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghanem R (1996) Numerical solution of spectral stochastic finite element systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 129:289–303CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghanem R (1999) Ingredients for a general purpose stochastic finite elements implementation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 168:19–34MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghanem R, Spanos P (1991) Stochastic finite elements: a spectral approach. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kleiber M, Hien T (1992) The stochastic finite element method—basic perturbation technique and computer implementation. Whiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schuëller G (2006) Developments in stochastic structural mechanics. Arch Appl Mech 75(10–12):755–773CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Papadopoulos V, Papadrakakis M (2004) Finite-element analysis of cylindrical panels with random initial imperfections. J Eng Mech 130(8):867–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papadopoulos V, Papadrakakis M (2005) The effect of material and thickness variability on the buckling load of shells with random initial imperfections. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:1405–1426CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papadopoulos V, Soimiris G, Papadrakakis M (2013) Buckling analysis of I-section portal frames with stochastic imperfections. Eng Struct 47:54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kepple J, Herath M, Pearce G, Prusty G, Thomson R, Degenhardt R (2015) Improved stochastic methods for modelling imperfections for buckling analysis of composite cylindrical shells. Eng Struct 100:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schenk C, Schüller G (2003) Buckling analysis of cylindrical shells with random geometric imperfections. Int J Non-Linear Mech 38(7):1119–1132CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Broggi M, Calvi A, Schuëller G (2011) Reliability assessment of axially compressed composite cylindrical shells with random imperfections. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 11(02):215–236MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baitsch M, Hartmann D (2006) Optimization of slender structures considering geometrical imperfections. Inverse Probl Sci Eng 14(6):623–637CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ditlevsen O (1991) Random field interpolation between point by point measured properties. In: Spanos PD, Brebbia CA (eds) Computational Stochastic Mechanics. Springer, Netherlands, pp 801 – 812Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang J, Ellingwood B (1994) Orthogonal series expansions of random fields in reliability analysis. J Eng Mech 120(12):2660–2677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loève M (1977) Probability theory. Springer, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oja E, Karhunen J (1985) On stochastic approximation of the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the expectation of a random matrix. J Math Anal Appl 106:69–84MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shang S, Yun G (2013) Stochastic finite element with material uncertainties: implementation in a general purpose simulation program. Finite Elem Anal Des 64:65–78MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Polizzi E (2009) Density-matrix-based algorithms for solving eigenvalue problems. Phys Rev B 79:115112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Polizzi E. A high-performance numerical library of solving eigenvalue problems: feast solver user’s guide. arxiv: 1203.4031
  24. 24.
    Tang P, Polizzi E (2013) Feast as a subspace iteration eigensolver accelerated by approximate spectral projection. arxiv: 1302.0432
  25. 25.
    Brenner C (1995) Ein Beitrag zur Zuverlässigkeit von Strukturen unter Berücksichtigung von Systemunsicherheiten mit Hilfe der Methode der stochastischen Finite Elemente. PhD thesis, Universität InnsbruckGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Phoon K-K (1995) Reliability-based design of foundations for transmission line structures. PhD thesis, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Taylor RL (2017) FEAP. www.ce.berkeley.edu/projects/feap/
  28. 28.
    Gruttmann F, Wagner W (2005) A linear quadrilateral shell element with fast stiffness computation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(39):4279–4300CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wagner W, Gruttmann F (1994) A simple finite rotation formulation for composite shell elements. Eng Comput 11:145–176MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wagner W, Gruttmann F (2005) A robust non-linear mixed hybrid quadrilateral shell element. Int J Numer Methods Eng 64:635–666CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dvorkin E, Bathe K-J (1984) A continuum mechanics based four-node shell element for general non-linear analysis. Eng Comput 1(1):77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Taylor R (1988) Finite element analysis of linear shell problems, ‘The mathematics of finite elements and applications VI. MAFELAP 1987’. Academic Press, London, pp 191–204Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wagner W, Wriggers P (1988) A simple method for the calculation of postcritical branches. Eng Comput 5:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Usami T (1993) Effective width of locally buckled plates in compression and bending. J Struct Eng 119(5):1358–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hot-rolled steel plates 3mm thick or above—tolerances on dimensions and shape. EN 10029 (02 2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eurcode 3: design of steel structures—part 1-5: plated structural elements, EN 1993-1-5 (12 2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Driver R, Kulak G, Elwi A, Kennedy D (1998) FE and simplified models of steel plate shear wall. J Struct Eng 124(2):121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Driver R, Kulak G, Kennedy D, Elwi A (1998) Cyclic test of four-story steel plate shear wall. J Struct Eng 124(2):112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kennedy D, Kulak G, Driver R (1994) Discussion of postbuckling behavior of steel-plate shear wall under cyclic loads. J Struct Eng 120(7):2250–2251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chróścielewski J, Makowski J, Stumpf H (1992) Genuinely resultant shell finite elements accounting for geometric and material non-linearity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 35(1):63–94CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Eurocode 3: design of steel structures, EN 1993 (2010)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Reddy J, Chandrashekhara K (1985) Nonlinear analysis of laminated shells including transverse shear strains. AIAA J 23(3):440–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kriegesmann B, Rolfes R, Hühne C, Teßmer J, Arbocz J (2010) Probabilistic design of axaxial compressed composite cylinders with geometric and loading imperfections. Int J Strucut Stab Dyn 10:623–644CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1965) Buckling of thin-walled circular cylindersGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hühne C, Rolfes R, Breitbach E, Teßmer J (2008) Robust design of composite cylindrical shells under axial compression—simulation and validation. Thin-Walled Struct 46:947–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Arbocz J, Starnes J Jr (2002) Future directions and challenges in shell stability analysis. Thin-Walled Struct 40(9):729–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Structural AnalysisKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations