Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Laparoscopic colposuspension

Is it cost-effective?

  • 20 Accesses

  • 16 Citations

Abstract

Background: The laparoscopic approach must be shown to be cost-effective as well as safe and technically effective before being widely adopted. A review of 54 consecutive patients who underwent open and laparoscopic colposuspension is presented and a cost-analysis is performed comparing the two approaches.

Methods: This study was a retrospective controlled review of patient records and accounts of in-hospital costs incurred at a private hospital.

Results: Theater costs were significantly greater in the laparoscopic group but this was balanced by a shorter length of stay and subsequent reduced accommodation cost. There was no difference in the overall in-hospital costs between the two groups.

Conclusion: The laparoscopic surgical approach is safe and effective and by no means more expensive than the open approach. In the future, the laparoscopic approach can only become more cost efficient; techniques will improve and there will be earlier returns to work and, subsequently, greater productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Author information

Additional information

Received: 19 August 1996/Accepted: 20 December 1996

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loveridge, K., Malouf, A., Kennedy, C. et al. Laparoscopic colposuspension . Surg Endosc 11 , 762 –765 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900445

Download citation

  • Key words: Laparoscopic — Colposuspension — Cost