Advertisement

Transoral robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy: comparative analysis of surgical outcomes using propensity score matching

  • Ji Young You
  • Hoon Yub KimEmail author
  • Da Won Park
  • Hsien Wen Yang
  • Hong Kyu Kim
  • Gianlorenzo Dionigi
  • Ralph P. Tufano
Article
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Various approaches for thyroid surgery became possible with the use of robotic systems. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) is one of the newest approaches and draws attention because of its cosmetic excellence. In this study, we compared the surgical outcomes of TORT and conventional open thyroidectomy (OT).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed and compared the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent TORT or OT for thyroid carcinoma from March 2009 to January 2018. Propensity score matching using 10 clinico-pathologic factors was used to generate two matched cohorts, each composed of 186 patients.

Results

The study included 372 patients who underwent TORT (n = 186) or OT (n = 186). Mean age, tumor size, and gender were not different between both groups. The two groups showed similar surgical outcomes, except for a longer operative time for TORT. There was one patient with immediate postoperative bleeding in the TORT group. The patient underwent re-operation for hemostasis with endoscopic approach. In the OT group, one patient had wound seroma, which was treated by several rounds of needle aspiration without infection. Vocal cord palsy was present in one patient in the TORT group, which was recovered in 3 months.

Conclusions

TORT could be performed safely and had comparable surgical outcomes with OT in the selected patients. TORT may be a suitable operative alternative for patients who do not want to leave scars on the neck.

Keywords

Propensity score matching Robotic thyroidectomy Transoral thyroidectomy Open thyroidectomy Thyroid carcinoma 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by Korea University Grants (K1816421, K1813081).

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Ji Young You, HoonYub Kim, Da Won Park, Hsien Wen Yang, Hong Kyu Kim, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, and Ralph P. Tufano, nor their close family members, have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Kan S, Niimi M (2000) Endoscopic neck surgery by the axillary approach. J Am Coll Surg 191:336–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sung ES, Ji YB, Song CM, Yun BR, Chung WS, Tae K (2016) Robotic thyroidectomy: comparison of a postauricular facelift approach with a gasless unilateral axillary approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154:997–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu HW, Yi JW, Seong CY, Kim JK, Bae IE, Kwon H, Chai YJ, Kim SJ, Choi JY, Lee KE (2017) Development of a surgical training model for bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 32:1360–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ohgami M, Ishii S, Arisawa Y, Ohmori T, Noga K, Furukawa T, Kitajima M (2000) Scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: breast approach for better cosmesis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc 23:2399–2406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim WW, Kim JS, Hur SM, Kim SH, Lee SK, Choi JH, Kim S, Lee JE, Kim JH, Nam SJ, Yang JH, Choe JH (2011) Is robotic surgery superior to endoscopic and open surgeries in thyroid cancer? World J Surg 35:779–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dionigi G, Bacuzzi A, Lavazza M, Inversini D, Pappalardo V, Boni L, Rausei S, Barczynski M, Tufano RP, Kim HY, Anuwong A (2016) Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via vestibular approach: operative steps and video. Gland Surg 5:625–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anuwong A, Sasanakietkul T, Jitpratoom P, Ketwong K, Kim HY, Dionigi G, Richmon JD (2018) Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA): indications, techniques and results. Surg Endosc 32:456–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richmon JD, Kim HY (2017) Transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT): procedures and outcomes. Gland Surg 6:285–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee HY, You JY, Woo SU, Son GS, Lee JB, Bae JW, Kim HY (2015) Transoral periosteal thyroidectomy: cadaver to human. Surg Endosc 29:898–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim HY, Chai YJ, Dionigi G, Anuwong A, Richmon JD (2017) Transoral robotic thyroidectomy: lessons learned from an initial consecutive series of 24 patients. Surg Endosc 32:688–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chai YJ, Kim HY, Kim HK, Jun SH, Dionigi G, Anuwong A, Richmon JD, Tufano RP (2017) Comparative analysis of 2 robotic thyroidectomy procedures: Transoral versus bilateral axillo-breast approach. Head Neck 40:886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun GH, Peress L, Pynnonen MA (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic vs conventional thyroidectomy approaches for thyroid disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150:520–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jackson NR, Yao L, Tufano RP, Kandil EH (2014) Safety of robotic thyroidectomy approaches: meta-analysis and systematic review. Head Neck 36:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim BS, Kang KH, Kang H, Park SJ (2014) Central neck dissection using a bilateral axillo-breast approach for robotic thyroidectomy: comparison with conventional open procedure after propensity score matching. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jiang Y, Gao B, Zhang X, Zhao J, Chen J, Zhang S, Luo D (2014) Prevention and treatment of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in thyroid surgery. Int J Clin Exp Med 7:101–107PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dionigi G, Chai YJ, Tufano RP, Anuwong A, Kim HY (2018) Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via a vestibular approach: why and how? Endocrine 59:275–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baek SJ, Kwak JM, Kim J, Kim SH, Park S, Korean Association of Robotic Surgeons Study G (2018) Robotic rectal surgery in Korea: analysis of a nationwide registry. Int J Med Robot 14:e1896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chai YJ, Kim HY, Kim HK, Jun SH, Dionigi G, Anuwong A, Richmon JD, Tufano RP (2018) Comparative analysis of 2 robotic thyroidectomy procedures: Transoral versus bilateral axillo-breast approach. Head Neck 40:886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji Young You
    • 1
  • Hoon Yub Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Da Won Park
    • 1
  • Hsien Wen Yang
    • 1
  • Hong Kyu Kim
    • 2
  • Gianlorenzo Dionigi
    • 3
  • Ralph P. Tufano
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, KUMC Thyroid Center, Korea University HospitalKorea University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of SurgerySeoul National University HospitalSeoulKorea
  3. 3.Division for Endocrine and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood “G.Barresi’University Hospital “G.Martino”, University of MessinaMessinaItaly
  4. 4.Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations