A scoring system to predict complex transanal endoscopic surgery
Since the introduction of screening for colorectal cancer, the use of transanal endoscopic surgery (TEM) has become increasingly popular. However, the technical difficulty of this surgery varies widely. The few studies of learning curve in TEM have produced very disparate results. The aim of this study is to distinguish between straightforward and complex procedures, in order to refer more difficult cases to centers with greater experience.
Observational study with prospective data collection and retrospective analysis was carried out between June 2004 and January 2019. All TEMs performed on rectal tumors were included. The complexity of the procedure was defined according to the weighted mean surgical time for each surgeon. A predictive model of complexity was established, with a score higher than 5 indicating a complex lesion.
During the study period, 773 TEMs were performed, 708 of which met the study’s inclusion criteria. One hundred and three tumors were defined as complex. Predictors of complexity were as follows: male sex (OR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.1–2.9, score: 1), tumor size > 5 cm (OR: 5.1, 95% CI 3.2–8.2, score: 4), TEM for recurrence (OR: 6.3, 95% CI 2.3–16.7, score: 5), and distance from the upper margin of the tumor to the anal verge > 15 cm (OR: 1.6, 95% CI 0.96–2.7, score: 1).
Rather than establishing the learning curve merely in terms of the number of TEM procedures performed, it is important to consider the surgical difficulty of the interventions. To this end, it is essential to differentiate simple TEMs from the complex ones.
KeywordsLearning curve Transanal endoscopic surgery TEM TEO
We thank the rest of the members of the Coloproctology Unit for applying the study protocol. We thank Cristina Gomez Vigo for correcting the manuscript and Michael Maudsley for helping with English. All authors contributed to the design and writing of the paper.
All authors agree to the submission of the paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Xavier Serra-Aracil X, Pere Rebasa, Laura Mora-López, Anna Pallisera, Sheila Serra-Pla, and Salvador Navarro-Soto have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 8.Serra-Aracil X, Labró-Ciurans M, Rebasa-Cladera P, Mora-López L, Pallisera-Lloveras A, Serra-Pla S, Gracia-Roman R, Navarro-Soto S (2018) Morbidity after transanal endoscopic surgery. Risk factors for postoperative complications in a one-day surgery program. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6432-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Serra-Aracil X, Gràcia R, Mora-López L, Serra-Pla S, Pallisera-Lloveras A, Labró M, Navarro-Soto S (2019) How to deal with rectal lesions more than 15 cm from the anal verge through transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Am J Surg 217:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.04.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Serra-Aracil X, Pallisera-Lloveras A, Mora-Lopez L, Rebasa P, Serra-Pla S, Navarro S (2019) Perforation in the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumors: a real surgical complication with a challenging prognosis? Surg Endosc 33:1870–1879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6466-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar