Laparoscopic gastric fundus tamponade: a novel adaptation of the Toupet fundoplication for large paraesophageal hernia repair

  • George Ferzli
  • Shinban LiuEmail author
  • Mazen Iskandar
  • Abe Fingerhut



Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia with defects too large to close primarily or greater than 8 cm is technically challenging. The ideal repair remains unclear and is often debated. Utilizing the gastric fundus as an autologous patch to obliterate and tamponade large hiatal defects may offer a new solution. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes following partial posterior fundoplication with gastric fundus tamponade.


Retrospective chart review and prospective patient follow up was conducted on patients who underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair between 2015 and 2019 by a single surgeon. Basic demographics, pre-operative diagnoses, operative technique, and clinical outcomes were recorded.


Fifteen patients underwent the described technique for repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia. All procedures were completed laparoscopically with a short post-operative length of stay (mean of 3 days) and no 30-day readmissions. The majority of patients reported resolution of their pre-operative symptoms. Only one patient required surgery for emergent indications and the same patient was the only mortality in the study, which was secondary to respiratory failure, necrotizing pneumonia, and sepsis as a result of gastric volvulus and obstruction.


Utilizing the gastric fundus as an autologous patch to repair large hiatal hernia may be a safe and efficacious solution with good short-term outcomes. However, further studies should be conducted to elucidate long-term results.


Paraesophageal hernia Hiatal hernia Gastric tamponade 


Compliance with ethical standards


The authors George Ferzli, Shinban Liu, Mazen Iskandar, and Abe Fingerhut have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE (2008) Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 22(4):601–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedland GW (1978) Historical review of the changing concepts of lower esophageal anatomy: 430B.C.–1977. Am J Roentgoenol 131:373–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hutter MM, Rattner DW (2007) Paraesophageal and other complex diaphragmatic hernias. In: Yeo CJ (ed) Shackelford’s surgery of the alimentary tract. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 549–562Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis SS Jr (2008) Current controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 88(5):959–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schieman C, Grondin SC (2009) Paraesophageal hernia: clinical presentation, evaluation, and management controversies. Thorac Surg Clin 19:473–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Memon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM et al (2016) Suture cruroplasty versus prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 263(2):258–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR et al (2000) Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective follow-up reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg 190:554–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Toupet MA (1963) Technique d’oesophago-gastroplastie avec phreno-gastropexie appliquee dans la cure radicale des hernies hiatales et comme complement de l’operation de Heller dans les cardiospasmes. Mem Acad Chir 89:394Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nissen R (1995) Eine einfache Operation zur Beein-flussung der Refluxoesophagitis. Schweiz Med Woochenschr 86:590–592Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferzli G, Fingerhut A (2004) Trocar placement for laparoscopic abdominal procedures: a simple standardized method. J Am Coll Surg 198(1):163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bammer T, Hinder RA, Klaus A, Klingler PJ (2001) Five to eight-year outcome of the first laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications. J Gastrointest Surg 5:42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagedorn C, Lonroth H, Rydberg L, Ruth M, Lundell L (2002) Long-teram efficacy of total (Nissen-Rossetti) and posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg 6:540–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zornig C, Strate U, Fibbe C, Emmermann A, Layer P (2002) Nissen vs Toupet laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc 16:758–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walker SJ, Holt S, Sanderson CJ, Stoddard CJ (1992) Comparison of Nissen total and lind partial transabdominal fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 79:410–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zornig C (2006) Laparoscopic toupet fundoplication. In: Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Pointner R (eds) Gastroesophageal reflux disease, vol 17. Springer, Vienna, pp 183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Targorona EM, Balague C, Martinez C, Garriga J, Trias M (2004) The massive hiatal hernia: dealing with the defect. Semin Laparsc Surg 11(3):161–169Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    DeMeester SR (2013) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: critical steps and adjunct techniques to minimize recurrence. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 23(5):429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dally E, Falk GL (2004) Teflon pledget reinforced fundoplication causes symptomatic gastric and esophageal lumenal penetration. Am J Surg 187:226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baladas HG, Smith GS, Richardson MA et al (2000) Esophagogastric fistula secondary to Teflon pledget: a rare complication following laparoscopic fundoplication. Dis Esophagus 13:72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuster GG, Gilroy S (1993) Laparoscopic technique for repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias. J Laparoendsc Surg 3:331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T et al (2005) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg 140:40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carlson MA, Richards CG, Frantzides CT (1999) Laparoscopic prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal herniorrhaphy. Dig Surg 16:407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tatum RP, Shalhub S, Oelschlager BK et al (2007) Complications of PTFE mesh at the diaphragmatic hiatus. J Gastrointest Surg 12:953–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wassenaar EB, Mier F, Sinan H et al (2012) The safety of biologic mesh for laparoscopic repair of large, complicated hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 26(5):1390–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B et al (2001) Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model. J Surg Res 99:282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Greene CL, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J et al (2013) Diaphragmatic relaxing incisions during laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 27(12):4532–4538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ghanem O, Doyle C, Sebastian R, Park A (2015) New surgical approach for giant paraesophageal hernia repair: closure of the esophageal hiatus anteriorly using the left triangular ligament. Dig Surg 32(2):124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park AE, Hoogerboord CM, Sutton E (2012) Use of the falciform ligament flap for closure of the esophageal hiatus in giant paraesophageal hernia. J Gastrointest Surg 16(7):1417–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Arevalo G, Wilkerson J, Saxe J (2018) Acute paraesophageal hernia: laparoscopic repair with adjunct t-fastener gastropexy for the high operative risk patient. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 28(2):123–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hakanson BS, Lundell L, Bylund A et al (2019) Comparison of laproscopic 270° posterior partial fundoplication vs total fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wirsching A, Zhang Q, McCormick SE et al (2018) Abnormal high-resolution manometry findings and outcomes after paraesophageal hernia repair. JACS. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zevin B, Jones EL, del Campo M, Perry KA (2017) Omission of preoperative esophageal manometry does not alter operative approach or postoperative dysphagia following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Dis Esophagus 30(7):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.General SurgeryNYU Langone HealthBrooklynUSA
  2. 2.Mount Sinai Health SystemNew York CityUSA
  3. 3.Section for Surgical Research, Department of SurgeryMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  4. 4.Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations