Advertisement

Modified liver hanging maneuver in laparoscopic major hepatectomy: the learning curve and evolution of indications

  • Ji Hoon KimEmail author
  • Hyeyoung Kim
2019 EAES Oral
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic major hepatectomy is a technically challenging procedure requiring a steep learning curve. The liver hanging maneuver is a useful technique in liver resection, especially for large or invasive tumors, a relative contraindication of the laparoscopic approach. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy using the liver hanging maneuver and extended indications.

Methods

Patients who underwent laparoscopic major hepatectomy using the liver hanging maneuver by a single surgeon from January 2013 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Our hanging technique involves placing the hanging tape along the inferior vena cava for right-sided hepatectomy or the ligamentum venosum for left-sided hepatectomy.

The upper end of the tape was placed at the lateral side of the major hepatic veins. The learning curve for operating time and blood loss was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method.

Results

Among 53 patients, 18 underwent right hepatectomy, 26 underwent left hepatectomy, and 9 underwent right posterior sectionectomy. CUSUM analysis showed that operative time and blood loss improved after the 30th laparoscopic major hepatectomy.

The 53 consecutive patients were divided into two groups (early, patients 1–30; late, patients 31–53). The median operative time was lower in the late group, but the difference was not statistically significant (270 vs. 245 min, p = 0.261). The median blood loss was also significantly lower in the late group (350 vs. 150 ml, p < 0.001).

Large tumors (measuring > 10 cm) and tumors in proximity to major vessels were significantly higher in the late group (0 vs. 17.4%, p = 0.018; 3.3 vs. 21.7%, p = 0.036; respectively).

Conclusion

This study shows that laparoscopic major hepatectomy using the modified liver hanging maneuver has a learning curve of 30 cases. After procedure standardization, the indications have gradually been extended to large or invasive tumors.

Keywords

Laparoscopic liver resection Laparoscopic major hepatectomy Learning curve Liver hanging maneuver 

Notes

Funding

No funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Ji Hoon Kim and Hyeyoung Kim have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, O’Rourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ, Tsung A, Soubrane O, Machado MA, Gayet B, Troisi RI, Pessaux P, Van Dam RM, Scatton O, Abu HM, Belli G, Kwon CH, Edwin B, Choi GH, Aldrighetti LA, Cai X, Cleary S, Chen KH, Schon MR, Sugioka A, Tang CN, Herman P, Pekolj J, Chen XP, Dagher I, Jarnagin W, Yamamoto M, Strong R, Jagannath P, Lo CM, Clavien PA, Kokudo N, Barkun J, Strasberg SM (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 250:772–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van der Poel MJ, Besselink MG, Cipriani F, Armstrong T, Takhar AS, van Dieren S, Primrose JN, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2016) Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surg 151:923–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B (2015) Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 102:796–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee W, Woo JW, Lee JK, Park JH, Kim JY, Kwag SJ, Park T, Jeong SH, Ju YT, Jeong EJ, Lee YJ, Choi SK, Hong SC, Jeong CY (2016) Comparison of learning curves for major and minor laparoscopic liver resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252:943–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson E, Janssens S, McLindon LA, Hewett DG, Jolly B, Beckmann M (2019) Improved laparoscopic skills in gynaecology trainees following a simulation-training program using take-home box trainers. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 59:110–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim JH, Ryu DH, Jang LC, Choi JW (2016) Lateral approach liver hanging maneuver in laparoscopic anatomical liver resections. Surg Endosc 30:3611–3617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim JH, Choi JW (2017) A modified liver hanging maneuver in pure laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy with preservation of the middle hepatic vein: video and technique. J Gastrointest Surg 21:1181–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JH (2019) Pure laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy using the Glissonean approach and a modified liver hanging maneuver (video). Gastrointest Surg 23:825–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwon Y, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY (2015) Are large hepatocellular carcinomas still a contraindication for laparoscopic liver resection? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25:98–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ai JH, Li JW, Chen J, Bie P, Wang SG, Zheng SG (2013) Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor size of 5–10 cm. PLoS ONE 8:e72328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shelat VG, Cipriani F, Basseres T, Armstrong TH, Takhar AS, Pearce NW, AbuHilal M (2015) Pure laparoscopic liver resection for large malignant tumors: does size matter? Ann Surg Oncol 22:1288–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY, Kim JH, Kwon Y (2013) Laparoscopic liver resection for centrally located tumors close to the hilum, major hepatic veins, or inferior vena cava. Surgery 153:502–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2018) Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 267:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hasegawa Y, Nitta H, Takahara T, Katagiri H, Kanno S, Otsuka K, Sasaki A (2018) Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy is suitable as a first step in pure laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2:376–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Belli G, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Kim KH, Cannon R, Kaneko H, Gamblin T, Koffron A, Dagher I, Buell JF (2013) Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy a consideration for acceptance as standard of care. Surg Endosc 27:2721–2726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim JH (2018) Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy using modified liver hanging maneuver: technical evolution from caudal approach toward ventral approach. J Gastrointest Surg 22:1343–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim JH (2018) Modified liver hanging maneuver focusing on outflow control in pure laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 32:2094–2100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Araki K, Conrad C, Ogiso S, Kuwano H, Gayet B (2014) Intraoperative ultrasonography of laparoscopic hepatectomy: key technique for safe liver transection. J Am Coll Surg 218:e37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Villani V, Bohnen JD, Torabi R, Sabbatino F, Chang DC, Ferrone CR (2016) “Idealized” vs. “True” learning curves: the case of laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxf) 18:504–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Belghiti J, Guevara OA, Noun R, Saldinger PF, Kianmanesh R (2001) Liver hanging maneuver: a safe approach to right hepatectomy without liver mobilization. J Am Coll Surg 193:109–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shindoh J, Hasegawa K, Aoki T, Beck Y, Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Kokudo N (2011) Significance of liver hanging maneuvers for invasive liver lesions in no-routine anterior approach policy. J Gastrointest Surg 15:988–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu CL, Fan ST, Cheung ST, Lo CM, Ng IO, Wong J (2006) Anterior approach versus conventional approach right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 244:194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim JH, Cho BS, Jang JH (2018) Pure laparoscopic anatomical segment VI resection using the Glissonean approach, Rouviere’s sulcus as a landmark, and a modified liver hanging maneuver (with video). Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryEulji University College of MedicineDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations