A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps
- 23 Downloads
Background and aims
The quality of colonoscopy is essential for successful colon cancer screening. Inadequate polypectomy technique can contribute to incomplete polypectomy. The primary outcome of this study was to compare the incomplete resection rate (IRR) for cold jumbo forceps polypectomy (JFP) and cold snare polypectomy (CSP). Secondary outcomes were to compare the rates of tissue retrieval and rates of procedure-related complications.
This prospective randomized parallel-group study assigned patients undergoing colonoscopy to jumbo biopsy forceps polypectomy (JFP) or cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for polyps ≤ 6 mm in size. After polyp removal was complete, the base of the polypectomy site was biopsied to evaluate for the presence of residual polyp tissue.
The resection quality was evaluated in 151 patients with 261 polyps ≤ 6 mm. The IRR was 9.6% (25/261) for all polyps, 11.1% (16/144) for JFP, and 7.7% (9/117) for CSP (P = 0.41). Failure of tissue retrieval was noted in 0/144 (0%) of JFP and 5/117 (4.3%) of CSP (P = 0.02). There were no procedure-related complications in either group.
Colon polyps are incompletely resected in a small but potentially significant percentage of cases. IRR are similar with the use of cold jumbo forceps and cold snare. Use of cold jumbo forceps may result in more successful tissue retrieval as compared to cold snare.
KeywordsCold snare polypectomy (CSP) Jumbo forceps polypectomy (JFP) Incomplete resection rate (IRR) Small colonic polyps Adenomatous polyps Biopsy forceps polypectomy
University of California San Diego
The authors wish to thank Shahrokh Golshan for assistance with the statistical analysis, and Amelia Parnell for the preparation of this manuscript for submission.
All authors were either primary authors of the manuscript, conducted manuscript revision, or approved the final manuscript.
An unrestricted educational grant funding from SpectraScience was used for this study. There were no institutional or corporate affiliations associated with this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Shireena Desai, Samir Gupta, Nedret Copur-Dahi, and Mary L. Krinsky have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Siegel R, Miller K, Fedewa S et al (2017) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA 67:177–193Google Scholar
- 18.Huh CW, Kim JS, Choi HH et al (2019) Jumbo biopsy forceps versus cold snares for removing diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest EndoscGoogle Scholar
- 25.ASGE Technology Committee, Dayyeh BKA, Thosani N, Konda V et al (2015) ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 81(3):502.e1–502.e16CrossRefGoogle Scholar