Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 33, Issue 10, pp 3494–3502 | Cite as

Minimally invasive surgical management of spontaneous esophageal perforation (Boerhaave’s syndrome)

  • Jessie A. Elliott
  • Louise Buckley
  • Mohamed Albagir
  • Antonios Athanasiou
  • Thomas J. MurphyEmail author
Dynamic Manuscript

Abstract

Background

Spontaneous esophageal perforation (Boerhaave’s syndrome) is a highly morbid condition traditionally associated with poor outcomes. The Pittsburgh perforation severity score (PSS) accurately predicts risk of morbidity, length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Operative management is indicated among patients with medium (3–5) or high (> 5) PSS; however, the role of minimally invasive surgery remains uncertain.

Methods

Consecutive patients presenting with Boerhaave’s syndrome with intermediate or high PSS managed via a thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach from 2012 to 2018 were reviewed. Demographics, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Ten patients (80% male) with a mean age of 61.3 years (range 37–81) were included. Two patients had intermediate and eight had high PSS (7.9 ± 2.8, range 4–12). The mean time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 27 ± 12 h and APACHE II score was 13.6 ± 4.9. Thoracoscopic debridement and primary repair was performed in eight cases, with two perforations repaired primarily over a T-tube. Laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy was performed in all patients. Critical care LOS was 8.7 ± 6.8 days (range 3–26), while inpatient LOS was 23.1 ± 12.5 days (range 14–46). Mean comprehensive complications index was 42.1 ± 26.2, with grade IIIa and IV morbidity in 60% and 10%, respectively. One patient developed dehiscence at the primary repair, which was managed non-operatively. In-hospital and 90-day mortality was 10%.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive surgical management of spontaneous esophageal perforation with medium to high perforation severity scores is feasible and safe, with outcomes which compare favorably to the published literature.

Keywords

Boerhaave’s syndrome Esophageal perforation Morbidity Mortality Comprehensive complications index Pittsburgh perforation severity score 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure

Jessie A. Elliott, Louise Buckley, Mohamed Albagir, Antonios Athanasiou, and Thomas J Murphy have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1—Thoracoscopic debridement and primary repair of spontaneous esophageal perforation [video file] (MP4 203200 kb)

464_2019_6863_MOESM2_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Derbes VJ, Mitchell RE Jr (1955) Hermann Boerhaave’s Atrocis, nec descripti prius, morbi historia, the first translation of the classic case report of rupture of the esophagus, with annotations. Bull Med Libr Assoc 43:217–240PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrett NR (1946) Spontaneous perforation of the oesophagus; review of the literature and report of three new cases. Thorax 1:48–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Wiggins T, Askari A, Faiz O, Zaninotto G, Hanna GB (2015) Management and outcomes of esophageal perforation: a national study of 2,564 patients in England. Am J Gastroenterol 110:1559–1566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Askari A, Faiz O, Hanna GB (2017) Effect of esophageal cancer surgeon volume on management and mortality from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions: population-based cohort study. Ann Surg 266:847–853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ali JT, Rice RD, David EA, Spicer JD, Dubose JJ, Bonavina L, Siboni S, O’Callaghan TA, Luo-Owen X, Harrison S, Ball CG, Bini J, Vercruysse GA, Skarupa D, Miller CC III, Estrera AL, Khalil KG (2017) Perforated esophageal intervention focus (PERF) study: a multi-center examination of contemporary treatment. Dis Esophagus 30:1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Loske G, Schorsch T, Muller C (2010) Endoscopic vacuum sponge therapy for esophageal defects. Surg Endosc 24:2531–2535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Pettiford BL, Pennathur A, Landreneau J, Landreneau J, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ (2009) Contemporaneous management of esophageal perforation. Surgery 146:749–755 (discussion 55–56) PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schweigert M, Sousa HS, Solymosi N, Yankulov A, Fernandez MJ, Beattie R, Dubecz A, Rabl C, Law S, Tong D, Petrov D, Schabitz A, Stadlhuber RJ, Gumpp J, Ofner D, McGuigan J, Costa-Maia J, Witzigmann H, Stein HJ (2016) Spotlight on esophageal perforation: a multinational study using the Pittsburgh esophageal perforation severity scoring system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151:1002–1009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schietroma M, Carlei F, Cappelli S, Amicucci G (2006) Intestinal permeability and systemic endotoxemia after laparotomic or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 243:359–363CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schietroma M, Piccione F, Carlei F, Clementi M, Bianchi Z, de Vita F, Amicucci G (2012) Peritonitis from perforated appendicitis: stress response after laparoscopic or open treatment. Am Surg 78:582–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Veenhof AA, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM, van Hoogstraten IM, vd Pas MH, Meijerink WJ, vd Peet DL, vd Tol MP, Bonjer HJ, Cuesta MA (2011) The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:53–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kohl A, Rosenberg J, Bock D, Bisgaard T, Skullman S, Thornell A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Haglind E (2018) Two-year results of the randomized clinical trial DILALA comparing laparoscopic lavage with resection as treatment for perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg 105(9):1128–1134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schultz JK, Wallon C, Blecic L, Forsmo HM, Folkesson J, Buchwald P, Korner H, Dahl FA, Oresland T, Yaqub S (2017) One-year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg 104:1382–1392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, Bonavina L, Rosman C, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL (2017) Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg 266:232–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, Brigand C, Carrere N, Collet D, Doddoli C, Flamein R, Mabrut JY, Meunier B, Msika S, Perniceni T, Peschaud F, Prudhomme M, Triboulet JP, Mariette C (2011) Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial—the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer 11:310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haveman JW, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Kobold JP, van Dam GM, Plukker JT, Hofker HS (2011) Adequate debridement and drainage of the mediastinum using open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for Boerhaave’s syndrome. Surg Endosc 25:2492–2497CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cho JS, Kim YD, Kim JW, Seok H, Kim MS (2011) Thoracoscopic primary esophageal repair in patients with Boerhaave’s syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg 91:1552–1555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Darrien JH, Kasem H (2013) Minimally invasive endoscopic therapy for the management of Boerhaave’s syndrome. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95:552–556PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Landen S, El Nakadi I (2002) Minimally invasive approach to Boerhaave’s syndrome: a pilot study of three cases. Surg Endosc 16:1354–1357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nakano T, Onodera K, Ichikawa H, Kamei T, Taniyama Y, Sakurai T, Miyata G (2018) Thoracoscopic primary repair with mediastinal drainage is a viable option for patients with Boerhaave’s syndrome. J Thorac Dis 10:784–789CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 41:580–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Healy LA, Ryan A, Doyle SL, Bhuachalla EBN, Cushen S, Segurado R, Murphy T, Ravi N, Donohoe CL, Reynolds JV (2017) Does prolonged enteral feeding with supplemental omega-3 fatty acids impact on recovery post-esophagectomy: results of a randomized double-blind trial. Ann Surg 266(5):720–728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling GE, D’Journo XB, Griffin SM, Holscher AH, Hofstetter WL, Jobe BA, Kitagawa Y, Kucharczuk JC, Law SY, Lerut TE, Maynard N, Pera M, Peters JH, Pramesh CS, Reynolds JV, Smithers BM, van Lanschot JJ (2015) International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: esophagectomy complications consensus group (ECCG). Ann Surg 262:286–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Pneumonia (Ventilator-associated [VAP] and non-ventilator-associated Pneumonia [PNEU]) Event 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/6pscVAPcurrent.pdf
  30. 30.
    Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS (2012) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA 307:2526–2533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ahmed Z, Elliott JA, King S, Donohoe CL, Ravi N, Reynolds JV (2017) Risk factors for anastomotic stricture post-esophagectomy with a standardized sutured anastomosis. World J Surg 41:487–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, Teoh R, Arnold A, Mackinlay C, Peckham D, Davies CWH, Ali N, Kinnear W, Bentley A, Kahan BC, Wrightson JM, Davies HE, Hooper CE, Lee YCG, Hedley EL, Crosthwaite N, Choo L, Helm EJ, Gleeson FV, Nunn AJ, Davies RJO (2011) Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. N Engl J Med 365:518–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Franchetti Y, Catalano PJ, Swanson S, Sugarbaker DJ, De Hoyos A, Maddaus MA, Nguyen NT, Benson AB, Fernando HC (2015) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study. Ann Surg 261:702–707CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, Schippers C, Brosens LAA, Joore HCA, Kroese CC, HajMohammad N, Mook S, Vleggaar FP, BorelRinkes IHM, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R (2018) Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269(4):621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barbour AP, Cormack OM, Baker PJ, Hirst J, Krause L, Brosda S, Thomas JM, Blazeby JM, Thomson IG, Gotley DC, Smithers BM (2016) Long-term health-related quality of life following esophagectomy: a nonrandomized comparison of thoracoscopically assisted and open surgery. Ann Surg 265(6):1158–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Roig J, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Gisbertz SS, Biere SS, van der Peet DL, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ (2015) Quality of life and late complications after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial. World J Surg 39:1986–1993CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sanabria A, Villegas MI, Morales Uribe CH (2013) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:Cd004778Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Coccolini F, Catena F, Pisano M, Gheza F, Fagiuoli S, Di Saverio S, Leandro G, Montori G, Ceresoli M, Corbella D, Sartelli M, Sugrue M, Ansaloni L (2015) Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 18:196–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wigley C, Athanasiou A, Bhatti A, Sheikh A, Hodson J, Bedford M, Griffiths EA (2019) Does the Pittsburgh Severity Score predict outcome in esophageal perforation? Dis Esophagus 32:doy109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schweigert M, Beattie R, Solymosi N, Booth K, Dubecz A, Muir A, Moskorz K, Stadlhuber RJ, Ofner D, McGuigan J, Stein HJ (2013) Endoscopic stent insertion versus primary operative management for spontaneous rupture of the esophagus (Boerhaave syndrome): an international study comparing the outcome. Am Surg 79:634–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Laukoetter MG, Mennigen R, Neumann PA, Dhayat S, Horst G, Palmes D, Senninger N, Vowinkel T (2017) Successful closure of defects in the upper gastrointestinal tract by endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT): a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 31:2687–2696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kuehn F, Loske G, Schiffmann L, Gock M, Klar E (2017) Endoscopic vacuum therapy for various defects of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Surg Endosc 31:3449–3458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Barakat MT, Girotra M, Banerjee S (2018) (Re)building the wall: recurrent Boerhaave syndrome managed by over-the-scope clip and covered metallic stent placement. Dig Dis Sci 63:1139–1142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Musala C, Eisendrath P, Brasseur A, Vincent JL, Cappeliez S, LeMoine O, Deviere J, Lemmers A (2015) Successful treatment of Boerhaave syndrome with an over-the-scope clip. Endoscopy 47(Suppl 1):UCTN:E24-5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kuwabara J, Watanabe Y, Kojima Y, Higaki N, Ikeda Y, Sato K, Yoshida M, Yamamoto Y, Kikuchi S (2016) Successful closure of spontaneous esophageal rupture (Boerhaave’s syndrome) by endoscopic ligation with snare loops. SpringerPlus 5:921CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ceppa DP, Rosati CM, Chabtini L, Stokes SM, Cook HC, Rieger KM, Birdas TJ, Lappas JC, Kessler WR, DeWitt JM, Maglinte DD, Kesler KA (2017) Development of a multidisciplinary program to expedite care of esophageal emergencies. Ann Thorac Surg 104:1054–1061CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vallbohmer D, Holscher AH, Holscher M, Bludau M, Gutschow C, Stippel D, Bollschweiler E, Schroder W (2010) Options in the management of esophageal perforation: analysis over a 12-year period. Dis Esophagus 23:185–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nilsson M, Kamiya S, Lindblad M, Rouvelas I (2017) Implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy in a tertiary referral center for esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis 9:S817–S825CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Oshikiri T, Yasuda T, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M, Kanaji S, Yamashita K, Matsuda T, Sumi Y, Nakamura T, Fujino Y, Tominaga M, Suzuki S, Kakeji Y (2016) Short-term outcomes and one surgeon’s learning curve for thoracoscopic esophagectomy performed with the patient in the prone position. Surg Today 47(3):313–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMercy University HospitalCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations