Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a cognitive task analysis framework toward training design
- 3 Downloads
One of the major impediments to the proliferation of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training in Western countries is the lack of sufficient experts as instructors. One way to address this gap is to develop didactic systems, such as surgical simulators, to support the role of trainers. Cognitive task analysis (CTA) has been used in healthcare for the design and improvement of surgical training programs, and therefore can potentially be used for design of similar systems for ESD.
The aim of the study was to apply a CTA-based approach to identify the cognitive aspects of performing ESD, and to generate qualitative insights for training.
Materials and methods
Semi-structured interviews were designed based on the CTA framework to elicit knowledge of ESD practitioners relating to the various tasks involved in the procedure. Three observations were conducted of expert ESD trainers either while they performed actual ESD procedures or at a training workshop. Interviews were either conducted over the phone or in person. Interview participants included four experts and four novices. The observation notes and interviews were analyzed for emergent qualitative themes and relationships.
The qualitative analysis yielded thematic insights related to four main cognition-related categories: learning goals/principles, challenges/concerns, strategies, and decision-making. The specific insights under each of these categories were systematically mapped to the various tasks inherent to the ESD procedure.
The CTA approach was applied to identify cognitive themes related to ESD procedural tasks. Insights developed based on the qualitative analysis of interviews and observations of ESD practitioners can be used to inform the design of ESD training systems, such as virtual reality-based simulators.
KeywordsEndoscopic surgery training Endoscopic submucosal dissection Gastrointestinal cancer ESD Human factors Cognitive task analysis
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of this study by NIH/NCI grant R01CA197491. The authors are grateful to Dr. Stavros N. Stavropoulos for providing his insights on the ESD procedure and utility of the CTA for training design, and for facilitating, in part, the data collection for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Dr. Sudeep Hegde reports grants and personal fees from the National Cancer Institute, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Cullen Jackson reports grants from the NIH/National Cancer Institute, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Aptima, Inc., outside the submitted work. Drs. Sudeep Hegde, Mark A. Gromski, Tansel Halic, Zhaohui Xia, Melih Turkseven, Mandeep S. Sawhney, Daniel B. Jones, Suvranu De, and Mr. Berk Cetinsaya have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T, Emura F, Ikehara H, Mashimo Y, Kikuchi T, Fu K-I, Sano Y, Saito D (2007) Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 66:966–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Yamamoto H, Hirobumi K, Tomizo Y, Norio I, Yukihiro S, Yutaka S, Toshihiko H, Kenji U, Kenichi I, Kentaro S (1999) A successful single-step endoscopic resection of a 40 millimeter flat-elevated tumor in the rectum: endoscopic mucosal resection using sodium. Gastrointest Endosc 50:701–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, Fukunaga S, Sakamoto T, Uraoka T, Nakajima T, Ikehara H, Fu K-I, Itoi T, Fujii T (2010) Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 24:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0562-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Iacopini F, Bella A, Costamagna G, Gotoda T, Saito Y, Elisei W, Grossi C, Rigato P, Scozzarro A (2012) Stepwise training in rectal and colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection with differentiated learning curves. Gastrointest Endosc 76:1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Emmanuel A, Gulati S, Burt M, Hayee B, Haji A (2018) Using endoscopic submucosal dissection as a routine component of the standard treatment strategy for large and complex colorectal lesions in a western tertiary referral unit. Dis Colon Rectum 61:743–750. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Vázquez-Sequeiros E, de Miguel DB, Foruny Olcina JR, González Martín JA, García M, Juzgado Lucas D, Garrido E, González C, Parra Blanco A, Arnau MRBA (2009) Training model for teaching endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 101:546–552. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1130-01082009000800005 Google Scholar
- 18.Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 21.Grunwald T, Clark D, Fisher S, McLaughlin M, Narayanan S, Piepol D (2004) Using cognitive task analysis to facilitate collaboration in development of simulator to accelerate surgical training. Stud Health Technol Inform 98:114–120Google Scholar
- 28.Scientific Software Development, GmbH: Atlas.ti 7, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- 29.Ignatov V, Tonev A, Kolev N, Zlatarov A, Shterev S, Kirilova T, Ivanov K (2016) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colon cancer. In: Colorectal Cancer—From Pathogenesis to Treatment. InTechGoogle Scholar