Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 33, Issue 7, pp 2376–2380 | Cite as

Laparoscopic management for aberrant hepatic duct in children with choledochal cysts

  • Mei Diao
  • Long LiEmail author
  • Wei ChengEmail author
New Technology

Abstract

Background

The aim of the current study is to evaluate efficacy of laparoscopic treatment for aberrant hepatic duct (AHD) in children with cholecochal cysts (CDC).

Methods

CDC children with AHDs who successfully underwent laparoscopic ductoplasties and hepaticojejunostomies between October 2001 and October 2017 were reviewed. The AHD variations were categorized into four subtypes and the surgical management varied according the subtypes.

Results

Sixty CDC patients with AHDs were reviewed. The mean age at surgery was 3.91 years. Two patients with Type 2 anomaly developed bile leaks after primary surgeries, and underwent laparoscopic anastomosis of AHD to jejunum in redo surgeries. In the remaining 58 patients, the average operative time was 3.75 h. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.02 days. The mean duration for full diet resumption was 2.25 days. The mean drainage time was 4.05 days. The median follow-up period was 30 months. Two patients with giant cysts had fluid collections, and were cured by drainages. One patient encountered duodenal injury at perforation site, and underwent laparoscopic repair. None of the patients had anastomotic stenosis, bile leak, cholangitis, intrahepatic reflux, pancreatic leak, pancreatitis, Roux-loop obstruction, or adhesive intestinal obstruction. Postoperative liver function tests and serum amylase level normalized within 1 year.

Conclusions

Recognition and treatment based on different subtypes of AHDs effectively prevent relevant complications. Individualized laparoscopic ductoplasty and hepaticojejunostomy is an efficacious management for AHDs in CDC children.

Keywords

Aberrant hepatic duct Ductoplasty Single-incision laparoscopy Choledochal cysts Children 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Dr. Mei DIAO, Prof. Long LI, and Prof. Wei CHENG declare no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Takahashi T, Shimotakahara A, Takahashi T, Lee KD, Lane GJ, Okazaki T, Yamataka A (2008) Choledochal cyst associated with an accessory hepatic duct identified by intra-operative endoscopy: case report and literature review. Pediatr Surg Int 24(9):1079–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goor DA, Ebert PA (1972) Anomalies of the biliary tree: report of a repair of anaccessory bile duct and review of the literature. Arch Surg 104:302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Momiyama T, Souda S, Yoshikawa Y, Kuratani T, Toda K, Koma M (1996) Injury to a duplicated cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6(4):315–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shivhare R, Sikora SS (2002) Double cystic duct: a rare biliary anomaly encountered at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 12:391–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huston TL, Dakin GF (2008) Double cystic duct. Can J Surg 51:E9–E10Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Samnani SS, Ali A (2015) “Y” variant of double cystic duct: incidental finding during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Surg 77:1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li L, Feng W, Jing-Bo F, Qi-Zhi Y, Gang L, Liu-Ming H, Yu L, Jun J, Ping W (2004) Laparoscopic-assisted total cyst excision of choledochal cyst and Roux-en-Y hepatoenterostomy. J Pediatr Surg 39:1663–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diao M, Li L, Dong N, Li Q, Cheng W (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy using conventional instruments for children with choledochal cysts. Surg Endosc 26(6):1784–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Sonnenberg E, D’Agostino H, Easter D (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: coordinated radiologic and surgical management in 21 patients. Radiology 188:399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Dufresne M, Lafortune M (1994) Iatrogenic injury to the bile duct: a working classification for radiologists. Radiology 193:523–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suhocki PV, Meyers WC (1999) Injury to aberrant bile ducts during cholecystectomy: a common cause of diagnostic error and treatment delay. Am J Roentgenol 172:955–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aoki T, Tsuchida A, Saito H, Nagakawa Y, Kitamura K, Koyanagi Y (2001) Strategies for management of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Diagn Ther Endosc 7(2):55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Narasimhan KL, Chowdhary SK, Rao KLN (2001) Management of accessory hepatic ducts in choledochal cysts. J Pediatr Surg 36:1092–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duh YC, Lai HS, Chen WJ (1997) Accessory hepatic duct associated with a choledochal cyst. Pediatr Surg Int 12:54–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ng WT, Wong MK, Kong CK (1993) Long accessory hepatic duct associated with congenital dilatation of the common bile duct. Am J Gastroenterol 88:619–621Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hathiramani Varun, Krishnan Janani, Raj Vinod, Redkar Rajeev G (2016) Choledochal cyst with an aberrant right cholecysto-hepatic duct draining into cystic duct and a review of literature. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 21(4):205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diao M, Li L, Cheng W (2016) Recurrence of biliary tract obstructions after primary laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy in children with choledochal cysts. Surg Endosc 30(9):3910–3915CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryCapital Institute of PediatricsBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Paediatrics and Department of Surgery, Southern Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations