Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 33, Issue 7, pp 2364–2375 | Cite as

Mesh fixation using novel bio-adhesive coating compared to tack fixation for IPOM hernia repair: in vivo evaluation in a porcine model

  • Amir Ben YehudaEmail author
  • Abraham Nyska
  • Amir Szold
New Technology
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Mesh fixation in hernia repair is currently based on penetrating sutures or anchors, with proven early and late complications such as pain, adhesions, erosions, and anchor migration. In an attempt to reduce these complications, a bio-adhesive-based self-fixation system was developed. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance and safety of this novel self-adhesive mesh (LifeMesh™) by comparing it with standard tack fixation.

Methods

A full-thickness abdominal wall defect was created bilaterally in 24 pigs. The defects were measured 14 days later, and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repairs were performed. In each animal, both LifeMesh and a titanium tack-fixed control, either uncoated polypropylene mesh (PP) or composite mesh (Symbotex™), were used. After 28 and 90 days, we performed macroscopic evaluation and analyzed the fixation strength, shrinkage, adhesion scores, and histopathology in all samples.

Results

Measurements at both time points revealed that LifeMesh had fully conformed to the abdominal wall, and that its fixation strength was superior to that of the tack-fixated Symbotex and comparable to that of the tack-fixated PP. Shrinkage in all groups was similar. Adhesion scores with LifeMesh were lower than with PP and comparable with Symbotex at both time points. Histology demonstrated similar tissue responses in LifeMesh and Symbotex. Lack of necrosis, mineralization, or exuberant inflammatory reaction in all three groups pointed to their good progressive integration of the mesh to the abdominal wall. By 28 days the bio-adhesive layer in LifeMesh was substantially degraded, allowing a gradual tissue ingrowth that became the main fixation mode of this mesh to the abdominal wall.

Conclusions

The excellent incorporation of LifeMesh to the abdominal wall and its superior fixation strength, together with its low adhesion score, suggest that LifeMesh may become a preferred alternative for abdominal wall repair.

Keywords

Self-fixating mesh Hernia repair Non-traumatic 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by LifeBond Ltd., Caesarea, Israel.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

The study was funded by LifeBond LTD, Caesarea, Israel. Dr. Ben Yehuda Amir is a medical advisor to LifeBond and reports personal fees from LifeBond, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Szold Amir is a medical advisor to LifeBond and reports personal fees from LifeBond, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Nyska Abraham has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Kingsnorth A (2004) Treating inguinal hernias. BMJ.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7431.59 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baylón K, Rodríguez-Camarillo P, Elías-Zúñiga A, Díaz-Elizondo JA, Gilkerson R, Lozano K (2017) Past, present and future of surgical meshes: a review. Membranes (Basel) 7(3):47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beldi G, Wagner M, Bruegger LE, Kurmann A, Candinas D (2011) Mesh shrinkage and pain in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing suture versus tack mesh fixation. Surg Endosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1246-0 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bageacu S, Blanc P, Breton C, Gonzales M, Porcheron J, Chabert M, Balique JG (2002) Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia: a retrospective study of 159 patients. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-0018-2 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reynvoet E, Berrevoet F (2014) Pros and cons of tacking in laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Technol Int 25(136):40Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karahasanoglu T, Onur E, Baca B, Hamzaoglu I, Pekmezci S, Boler DE, Kilic N, Altug T (2004) Spiral tacks may contribute to intra-abdominal adhesion formation. Surg Today.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-004-2831-4 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gungor B, Malazgirt Z, Topgül K, Gök A, Bilgin M, Yürüker S (2010) Comparative Evaluation of Adhesions to Intraperitoneally Placed Fixation Materials: a Laparoscopic Study in Rats. Indian J Surg. 72(6):475–480.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0168-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haltmeier T, Groebli Y (2013) Small bowel lesion due to spiral tacks after laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernia. Int J Surg Case Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2012.12.005 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peach G, Tan LC (2008) Small bowel obstruction and perforation due to a displaced spiral tacker: a rare complication of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 12(3):303–305.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0289-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fitzgerald HL, Orenstein SB, Novitsky YW (2010) Small bowel obstruction owing to displaced spiral tack after laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 20(3):e132–e135.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0b013e3181dfbc05 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kenton K, FitzGerald MP, Brubaker L (2002) Multiple foreign body erosions after laparoscopic colposuspension with mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.124288 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wirsching A, Vonlanthen R, Lehmann K (2014) Gallbladder perforation by absorbable spiral tacker. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 3:150.  https://doi.org/10.1308/003588414x13946184902280 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malmstrøm ML, Thorlacius-Ussing O (2010) Cardiac tamponade as a rare complication in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Hernia 14:421–422.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0557-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Golash V (2008) Large gut fistula due to a protruding spiral tacker after laparoscopic repair of a ventral hernia. Oman Med J 23(1):50Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ladurner R, Mussack T (2004) Small bowel perforation due to protruding spiral tackers: a rare complication in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-4276-z Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paz YE, Vazquez J, Bessler M (2011) Cardiac tamponade as a complication of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: case report and literature review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 3:150.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23178 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baltazar G, Coakley K, Badiwala A, Chendrasekhar A (2013) Ventral hernia mesh tack causes liver hemorrhage. Hernia 3:150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-1001-7 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feliu X, Claveria R, Besora P, Luque D, Vinas X (2011) A calcified foreign body in the bladder due to: an unusual complication after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0b013e31820660fc Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lantis JC, Schwaitzberg SD (1999) Tack Entrapment of the Ilioinguinal Nerve during Laparoscopic Hernia Repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.1999.9.285 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chevallier JM, Wind P, Lassau JP (1996) Damage to the inguino-femoral nerves in the treatment of hernias. An anatomical hazard of traditional and laparoscopic techniques. Ann Chir 50(9):767–775Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reinpold W, Schroeder AD, Schroeder M, Berger C, Rohr M, Wehrenberg U (2015) Retroperitoneal anatomy of the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, genitofemoral, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve: consequences for prevention and treatment of chronic inguinodynia. Hernia.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1396-z Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stark E, Oestreich K, Wendl K, Rumstadt B, Hagmüller E (1999) Nerve irritation after laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649901124 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hiremath BV, Rajasridhar B, Pipara G (2012) Tack sinus: a new complication of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. World J Laparosc Surg.  https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1159 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reynvoet E, Berrevoet F, De Somer F, Vercauteren G, Vanoverbeke I, Chiers K, Troisi R (2012) Tensile strength testing for resorbable mesh fixation systems in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 3:150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2224-5 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19(1):48–54.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200301000-00006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gillian GK, Geis WP, Grover G (2002) Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair (LIVH): an evolving outpatient technique. JSLS 6(4):315Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Antoniou SA, Köhler G, Antoniou GA, Muysoms FE, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2016) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing nonpenetrating vs mechanical mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 211(1):239–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harslof SS, Wara P, Friis-Andersen H (2014) Fixation devices in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a review. Surg Technol Int 24:203–213Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Labori KJ, Trondsen E, Buanes T, Hauge T (2009) Endoscopic sealing of pancreatic fistulas: four case reports and review of the literature. Scand J Gastroenterol 3:150.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00365520903362610 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lindsey I, Smilgin-Humphreys MM, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJM, George BD (2002) A randomized, controlled trial of fibrin glue vs. conventional treatment for anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.dcr.0000034622.59957.55 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pascual G, Sotomayor S, Rodríguez M, Pérez-Köhler B, Kühnhardt A, Fernández-Gutiérrez M, San Román J, Bellón JM (2016) Cytotoxicity of cyanoacrylate-based tissue adhesives and short-term preclinical in vivo biocompatibility in abdominal hernia repair. PLoS ONE 11:e0157920.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Samson D, Marshall D (1986) Carcinogenic potential of isobutyl-2-cyanoacrylate. J Neurosurg 65(4):571–572.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1986.65.4.0571a Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, Walder N, Mittermayr R, Öhlinger W, Heinze A, Redl H (2007) Cyanoacrylate tissue sealant impairs tissue integration of macroporous mesh in experimental hernia repair. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 21:1781–1785.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9243-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sanders DL, Waydia S (2014) A systematic review of randomised control trials assessing mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 30:150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1093-8 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fernández Lobato R, García Septiem J, Ortega Deballon P, Marín Lucas FJ, Ruíz De Adana JC, Limones Esteban M (2001) Tissucol application in dermolipectomy and incisional hernia repair. Int Surg 86(4):240–245Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chevrel JP, Rath AM, Chevrel P (1997) The use of fibrin glues in the surgical treatment of incisional hernias. Hernia.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02426381 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Campanelli G, Pascual MH, Hoeferlin A, Rosenberg J, Champault G, Kingsnorth A, Miserez M (2012) Randomized, controlled, blinded trial of tisseel/tissucol for mesh fixation in patients undergoing lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia repair: results of the TIMELI trial. Ann Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31824b32bf Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bracale U, Rovani M, Picardo A, Merola G, Pignata G, Sodo M, Di Salvo E, Ratto EL, Noceti A, Melillo P, Pecchia L (2014) Beneficial effects of fibrin glue (Quixil) versus Lichtenstein conventional technique in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. Hernia.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-1020-4 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu H, Zheng X, Gu Y, Guo S (2015) A meta-analysis examining the use of fibrin glue mesh fixation versus suture mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair. Dig Surg 31(6):444–451.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000370249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schreinemacher MHF, van Barneveld KWY, Peeters E, Miserez M, Gijbels MJJ, Greve JWM, Bouvy ND (2014) Adhesions to sutures, tackers, and glue for intraperitoneal mesh fixation: an experimental study. Hernia 18:865–872.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1192-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schug-Pass C, Lippert H, Köckerling F (2009) Fixation of mesh to the peritoneum using a fibrin glue: Investigations with a biomechanical model and an experimental laparoscopic porcine model. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0509-0 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jenkins ED, Melman L, Desai S, Brown SR, Frisella MM, Deeken CR, Matthews BD (2011) Evaluation of intraperitoneal placement of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier coated mesh secured with fibrin sealant in a New Zealand white rabbit model. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 25(2):604–612.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1230-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shahan CP, Stoikes NN, Roan E, Tatum J, Webb DL, Voeller GR (2017) Short-term strength of non-penetrating mesh fixation: LifeMesh???, Tisseel???, and ProGrip??? Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 31:1350–1353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5119-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shahan CP, Stoikes NN, Roan E, Tatum J, Webb DLVG (2018) Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of LifeMesh™: biomechanical and histologic evaluation of LifeMesh™: a novel self-fixating mesh adhesive. Am Surg 84:520–525Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sahoo S, Baker AR, Haskins IN, Krpata DM, Rosen MJ, Derwin KA (2017) Development of a critical-sized ventral hernia model in the pig. J Surg Res 210:115–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.10.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cobb WS, Burns JM, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, James Norton H, Todd Heniford B (2005) Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults. J Surg Res 129:231–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gudmundsson FF, Viste A, Gislason H, Svanes K (2002) Comparison of different methods for measuring intra-abdominal pressure. Intensive Care Med.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-001-1187-0 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Baptista ML, Bonsack ME, Felemovicius I, Delaney JP (2000) Abdominal adhesions to prosthetic mesh evaluated by laparoscopy and electron microscopy. J Am Coll Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00277-x Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Surgical Membrane Study Group (1992) Prophylaxis of pelvic sidewall adhesions with Gore-Tex surgical membrane: *a multicenter clinical investigation. Fertil Steril 57:921–923.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54981-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tagaya N, Mikami H, Aoki H, Kubota K (2004) Long-term complications of laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200402000-00002 Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Eubanks S, Newman L 3rd, Goehring L, Lucas GW, Adams CP, Mason E, Duncan T (1993) Meralgia paresthetica: a complication of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(5):381–385Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Phillips EH, Arregui M, Carroll BJ, Corbitt J, Crafton WB, Fallas MJ, Filipi C, Fitzgibbons RJ, Franklin MJ, McKernan B, Olsen D, Ortega A, Payne JH, Peters J, Rodriguez R, Rosette P, Schultz L, Seid A, Sewell R, Smoot R, Toy F, Waddell R, Watson S (1995) Incidence of complications following laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00187878 Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Toosie K, Gallego K, Stabile BE, Schaber B, French S, De Virgilio C (2000) Fibrin glue reduces intra-abdominal adhesions to synthetic mesh in a rat ventral hernia model. Am Surg 66(1):41Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Petter-Puchner AH, Fortelny R, Mittermayr R, Öhlinger W, Redl H (2005) Fibrin sealing versus stapling of hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat. Hernia.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0009-7 Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Garcia-Vallejo L, Couto-Gonzalez I, Concheiro-Coello P, Brea-Garcia B, Taboada-Suarez A (2014) Cyanoacrylate surgical glue for mesh fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0b013e3182a2f008 Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Jourdan IC, Bailey ME (1998) Initial experience with the use of n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate glue for the fixation of polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00019509-199808000-00011 Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Topart P, Vandenbroucke F, Lozac’h P (2005) Tisseel vs tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias: a retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8812-2 Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Novik B, Hagedorn S, Mörk UB, Dahlin K, Skullman S, Dalenbäck J (2006) Fibrin glue for securing the mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a study with a 40-month prospective follow-up period. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0391-3 Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E, Mazzilli M, Bardone M, Bottero L, Faillace G, Longoni M (2007) Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000245832.59478.c6 Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Canonico S, Santoriello A, Campitiello F, Fattopace A, Della Corte A, Sordelli I, Benevento R (2005) Mesh fixation with human fibrin glue (Tissucol) in open tension-free inguinal hernia repair: a preliminary report. Hernia.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0020-z Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jenkins ED, Melman L, Frisella MM, Deeken CR, Matthews BD (2010) Evaluation of acute fixation strength of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier coated mesh secured with fibrin sealant. Hernia 14:505–509.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0670-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Shahan CP, Stoikes NN, Roan E, Tatum J, Webb DL, Voeller GR (2017) Short-term strength of non-penetrating mesh fixation: Lifemesh™, Tisseel™, and ProGrip™. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5119-z Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Eriksen JR, Bisgaard T, Assaadzadeh S, Jorgensen LN, Rosenberg J (2013) Fibrin sealant for mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: 1-year results of a randomized controlled double-blinded study. Hernia 17:511–514.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1101-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Schug-Pass C, Lippert H, Köckerling F (2010) Mesh fixation with fibrin glue (Tissucol/Tisseel??) in hernia repair dependent on the mesh structure—is there an optimum fibrin-mesh combination?—investigations on a biomechanical model. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 395:569–574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0466-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Leggat PA, Smith DR, Kedjarune U (2007) Surgical applications of cyanoacrylate adhesives: a review of toxicity. ANZ J Surg 77(4):209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Leggat PA, Kedjarune U, Smith DR (2004) Toxicity of cyanoacrylate adhesives and their occupational impacts for dental staff. Ind Health.  https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.42.207 Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Dinsmore RC, Calton WC, Harvey SB, Blaney MW (2000) Prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh in a traumatized bowel model. J Am Coll Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00337-9 Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Eriksen JR, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J (2007) Choice of mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 11(6):481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Junge K, Binnebösel M, Rosch R, Jansen M, Kämmer D, Otto J, Schumpelick V, Klinge U (2009) Adhesion formation of a polyvinylidenfluoride/polypropylene mesh for intra-abdominal placement in a rodent animal model. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 23:327–333.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9923-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Divilio LT (2005) Surgical adhesion development and prevention. Int Surg 90(3 Suppl):S6Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    DiZerega GS, Campeau JD (2001) Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.6.547 Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Nohuz E, Alaboud M, Darcha C, Alloui A, Aublet-Cuvelier B, Jacquetin B (2014) Effectiveness of Hyalobarrier and Seprafilm to prevent polypropylene mesh shrinkage: a macroscopic and histological experimental study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2357-2 Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Jonas J (2009) The problem of mesh shrinkage in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Zentralbl Chir.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1098779 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryAssaf Harofeh Medical CenterZerifinIsrael
  2. 2.Toxicologic Pathology, Timrat and Sackler School of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Assia Medical GroupAssuta Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations