Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 33, Issue 7, pp 2083–2092 | Cite as

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic repeat liver resection after open liver resection: a systematic review

  • Taiga Wakabayashi
  • Emanuele Felli
  • Riccardo Memeo
  • Pietro Mascagni
  • Yuta Abe
  • Yuko Kitagawa
  • Patrick PessauxEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) still represents a challenge for surgeons especially in case with previous open liver surgery. The aim of the study is to perform a systematic review of the current literature to investigate the feasibility of LRLR after open liver resection (OLR) for liver diseases.

Methods

A computerized search was performed for all English language studies evaluating LRLR. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the short-term outcomes in comparative studies between LRLR with previous laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and OLR.

Results

From the initial 55 manuscripts, 8 studies including 3 comparative studies between LRLR after OLR and LLR were investigated. There was a total of 108 patients. Considering initial surgery, the extent of initial liver resection was major liver resection in 20% of patients in whom it was reported. In all the patients, the most frequent primary histology was hepatocellular carcinoma, followed by colorectal liver metastasis. A half of reported patients had severe adhesions at the time of LRLR. The median operative time for LRLR was ranged from 120 to 413 min and the median blood loss ranged from 100 to 400 mL. There were 11% of the patients conversions to open surgery, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery, or tumor ablation. The overall postoperative morbidity was 15% of all the patients, and there was no postoperative mortality. The median postoperative hospital stay was ranged from 3.5 to 10 days. The meta-analysis shows that LRLR after OLR is associated with a longer operative time and a more important blood loss compared to LRLR after LLR. However, no difference between LRLR after OLR and LLR was shown as far as hospital stay and morbidity rate are concerned.

Conclusions

LRLR after OLR has been described in eight articles with favorable short-term outcomes in highly selected patients.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Repeat liver resection Repeat hepatectomy Redo liver surgery Previous open liver resection Short-term outcomes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Christopher Burel and Guy Temporal for their assistance in proofreading the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Dr. Taiga Wakabayashi, Dr. Emanuele Felli, Dr. Riccardo Memeo, Dr. Pietro Mascagni, Dr. Yuta Abe, Dr. Yuko Kitagawa, and Dr. Patrick Pessaux have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS, World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic S (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, O’Rourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ, Tsung A, Soubrane O, Machado MA, Gayet B, Troisi RI, Pessaux P, Van Dam RM, Scatton O, Abu Hilal M, Belli G, Kwon CH, Edwin B, Choi GH, Aldrighetti LA, Cai X, Cleary S, Chen KH, Schon MR, Sugioka A, Tang CN, Herman P, Pekolj J, Chen XP, Dagher I, Jarnagin W, Yamamoto M, Strong R, Jagannath P, Lo CM, Clavien PA, Kokudo N, Barkun J, Strasberg SM (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Minagawa M, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Kokudo N (2003) Selection criteria for repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 238:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adam R, Bismuth H, Castaing D, Waechter F, Navarro F, Abascal A, Majno P, Engerran L (1997) Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 225:51–60 (discussion 60–52)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Alikhanov R, Aroori S, Belli G, Besselink M, Briceno J, Gayet B, D’Hondt M, Lesurtel M, Menon K, Lodge P, Rotellar F, Santoyo J, Scatton O, Soubrane O, Sutcliffe R, Van Dam R, White S, Halls MC, Cipriani F, Van der Poel M, Ciria R, Barkhatov L, Gomez-Luque Y, Ocana-Garcia S, Cook A, Buell J, Clavien PA, Dervenis C, Fusai G, Geller D, Lang H, Primrose J, Taylor M, Van Gulik T, Wakabayashi G, Asbun H, Cherqui D (2018) The Southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg 268:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goh BK, Teo JY, Chan CY, Lee SY, Cheow PC, Chung AY (2016) Review of 103 cases of laparoscopic repeat liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:876–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dalkey N, Helmer O (1963) An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci 9:458–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pang YY (2002) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–339. (HPB (Oxford) 4:99; author reply 99–100)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petrie JC, Grimshaw JM, Bryson A (1995) The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Initiative: getting validated guidelines into local practice. Health Bull (Edinb) 53:345–348Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5::13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu S, Bo T, Hou B, Li J, Zhou X (2018) Surgery strategy of 13 cases to control bleeding from the liver on laparoscopic repeat liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. J Minim Access Surg.  https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_214_17 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu K, Chen Y, Wu X, Huang Z, Lin Z, Jiang J, Tan W, Zhang L (2017) Laparoscopic liver re-resection is feasible for patients with posthepatectomy hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: a propensity score matching study. Surg Endosc 31:4790–4798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goh BKP, Teo JY, Chan CY, Lee SY, Cheow PC, Chung AYF (2017) Laparoscopic repeat liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. ANZ J Surg 87::E143–E146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cioffi L, Belli A, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Russo G, Belli G (2015) Repeat liver surgery by laparoscopy for a malignant recurrence after previous open or laparoscopic resection. Hepatoma Res 1:30–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kanazawa A, Tsukamoto T, Shimizu S, Kodai S, Yamamoto S, Yamazoe S, Ohira G, Nakajima T (2013) Laparoscopic liver resection for treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:512–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shafaee Z, Kazaryan AM, Marvin MR, Cannon R, Buell JF, Edwin B, Gayet B (2011) Is laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy feasible? A tri-institutional analysis. J Am Coll Surg 212:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hu M, Zhao G, Xu D, Liu R (2011) Laparoscopic repeat resection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 35:648–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wakabayashi T, Abe Y, Itano O, Shinoda M, Kitago M, Yagi H, Hibi T, Oshima G, Minagawa T, Kitagawa Y (2018) Laparoscopic repeat liver resection after open liver resection: a comparative study from a single-centre. J Minim Access Surg  https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_175_18 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, Wolff BG, Roberts PL, Smith LE, Sweeney SA, Moore M (1996) Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 183:297–306Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fretland AA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjornelv GMW, Kazaryan AM, Kristiansen R, Fagerland MW, Hausken J, Tonnessen TI, Abildgaard A, Barkhatov L, Yaqub S, Rosok BI, Bjornbeth BA, Andersen MH, Flatmark K, Aas E, Edwin B (2018) Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beppu T, Wakabayashi G, Hasegawa K, Gotohda N, Mizuguchi T, Takahashi Y, Hirokawa F, Taniai N, Watanabe M, Katou M, Nagano H, Honda G, Baba H, Kokudo N, Konishi M, Hirata K, Yamamoto M, Uchiyama K, Uchida E, Kusachi S, Kubota K, Mori M, Takahashi K, Kikuchi K, Miyata H, Takahara T, Nakamura M, Kaneko H, Yamaue H, Miyazaki M, Takada T (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T, Aihara A, Hasegawa K, Gotohda N, Hatano E, Tanahashi Y, Mizuguchi T, Kamiyama T, Ikeda T, Tanaka S, Taniai N, Baba H, Tanabe M, Kokudo N, Konishi M, Uemoto S, Sugioka A, Hirata K, Taketomi A, Maehara Y, Kubo S, Uchida E, Miyata H, Nakamura M, Kaneko H, Yamaue H, Miyazaki M, Takada T (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:721–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morise Z (2018) Status and perspective of laparoscopic repeat liver resection. World J Hepatol 10:479–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shelat VG, Serin K, Samim M, Besselink MG, Al Saati H, Gioia PD, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2014) Outcomes of repeat laparoscopic liver resection compared to the primary resection. World J Surg 38:3175–3180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang J, Zhou ZG, Huang ZX, Yang KL, Chen JC, Chen JB, Xu L, Chen MS, Zhang YJ (2016) Prospective, single-center cohort study analyzing the efficacy of complete laparoscopic resection on recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Chin J Cancer 35:25Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Isetani M, Morise Z, Kawabe N, Tomishige H, Nagata H, Kawase J, Arakawa S (2015) Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy as repeat surgery and repeat hepatectomy. World J Gastroenterol 21:961–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chan AC, Poon RT, Chok KS, Cheung TT, Chan SC, Lo CM (2014) Feasibility of laparoscopic re-resection for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 38:1141–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taiga Wakabayashi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Emanuele Felli
    • 1
    • 3
    • 5
  • Riccardo Memeo
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Pietro Mascagni
    • 5
  • Yuta Abe
    • 2
  • Yuko Kitagawa
    • 2
  • Patrick Pessaux
    • 1
    • 3
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Institut de Recherche Contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif (IRCAD)StrasbourgFrance
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of General, Digestive, and Endocrine Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital CivilUniversité de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
  4. 4.Department of Emergency and Organ TransplantationUniversity Aldo Moro of BariBariItaly
  5. 5.Institute of Minimally Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided SurgeryInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU), Université de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations