Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 33, Issue 12, pp 4098–4101 | Cite as

Linear vs. circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

  • Alexander C. Barr
  • Kathleen L. Lak
  • Melissa C. Helm
  • Tammy L. Kindel
  • Rana M. Higgins
  • Jon C. GouldEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

Various surgical techniques exist to create the gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Linear-stapled anastomosis (LSA) and circular-stapled anastomosis (CSA) are two commonly employed techniques. We hypothesized that CSA is associated with an increased rate of surgical site infection (SSI) and gastrojejunostomy stenosis when compared to LSA.

Methods

This study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent LRYGB for morbid obesity at a single institution between 2012 and 2016. Three bariatric surgeons contributed patients to this series. Clinical information and perioperative outcomes were collected through 90 days after surgery.

Results

171 patients met the inclusion criteria. Two patients did not complete 90-day follow-up and were excluded from the analysis (88 patients CSA, 81 LSA; 99% 90-day follow-up). Patient demographics did not differ between groups. The LSA technique was associated with a significantly reduced rate of SSI (0 (0%) vs. 6 (6.8%), p = 0.02) and stenosis (2 (2.5%) vs. 17 (19.3%), p < 0.01). The CSA technique demonstrated a greater number of endoscopic dilations per stenotic event (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 1.0 ± 0, p = 0.03).

Conclusion

In our experience, a gastrojejunostomy constructed with an LSA technique was associated with a significantly reduced rate of stenosis and SSI compared to the CSA technique. LSA is currently our anastomotic technique of choice in LRYGB.

Keywords

Surgical site infection Stenosis Gastrojejunostomy Laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass Circular-stapled anastomosis Linear-stapled anastomosis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Dr. Gould is a consultant for Torax Medical/Ethicon. Alexander C. Barr, Kathleen L. Lak, Melissa C. Helm, Tammy L. Kindel, Rana M. Higgins and Jon C. Gouldhave no financial conflicts to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Varela JE, Nguyen NT (2015) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leads the U.S. utilization of bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(5):987–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Major P, Janik MR, Wysocki M, Waledziak M, Pedziwiatr M, Kowelewski PK, Malczak P, Pasnik K, Budzynski A (2017) Comparison of circular-and linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a multicenter study. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 12(2):140–146PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madan AK, Harper JL, Tichansky DS (2008) Techniques of laparoscopic gastric bypass: online survey of American Society for Bariatric Surgery practicing surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lois AW, Frelich MJ, Goldblatt MI, Wallace JR, Gould JC (2015) Gastrojejunostomy technique and anastomotic complications in laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(4):808–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Healthcare Safety Network, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surgical site infection (SSI) event. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf. January 2017. Accessed August 23, 2018
  6. 6.
    Gould JC, Garren MJ, Boll V, Starling J (2006) The impact of circular stapler diameter on the incidence of gastrojejunostomy stenosis and weight loss following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 20(7):1017–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giordano S, Salminen P, Biancari F, Victorzon M (2011) Linear stapler technique may be safer than circular in gastro-jejunal anastomosis for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Obes Surg 21(12):1958–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edholm D, Sundbom M (2015) Comparison between circular-and linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass—a cohort from the Scandinavian Obesity Registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(6):1233–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang HP, Lin LL, Jiang X, Qiao HQ (2016) Meta-analysis of hand-sewn versus mechanical gastro-jejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Int J Surg; (32):150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Penna M, Markar SR, Venkat-Raman V, Karthikesalingam A, Hashemi M (2012) Linear-stapled versus circular-stapled laparoscopic gastro-jejunal anastomosis in morbid obesity: meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22(2):95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith C, Garren M, Gould J (2011) Impact of gastrojejunostomy diameter on long-term weight loss following laparoscopic gastric bypass: a follow-up study. Surg Endosc 25(7):2164–2167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ruiz de Adana JC, Hernández Matías H, Hernández Bartolomé M, Manzanedo R, Leon Ledesma R, Valle Rubio A, Lopez Herrero J, Limones Esteban M (2009) Risk of gastro-jejunal anastomotic stricture with multifilament and monofilament sutures after hand-sewn laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective cohort study. Obes Surg 19:1274–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilmore MM, Kallies KJ, Mathiason MA, Kothari SN (2013) Varying marginal ulcer rates in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity versus gastroesophageal reflux disease: is the acid pocket to blame? Surg Obes Relat Dis 9(6):862–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takata MC, Ciovica R, Cello JP, Posselt AM, Rogers SJ, Campos GM (2007) Predictors, treatment, and outcomes of gastrojejunostomy stricture after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 17(7):878–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Finks JF, Carlin A, Share D, Hawasli A, English WJ, Genaw J, Finks JF, Carlin AM, Birkmeyer JD, Michigan Bariatric Surgical Collaborative (2011) Effect of surgical techniques on clinical outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass—results from the Michigan bariatric surgery collaborative. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7(3):284–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang Y, Serrano OK, Scott Melvin W, Camacho D (2016) An intraoperative technique to reduce superficial surgical site infections in circular stapler-constructed laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(5):1008–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shabino PJ, Khoraki J, Elegbede AF, Schmoker RK, Nabozny MJ, Funk LM, Greenberg JA, Campos GM (2016) Reduction of surgical site infections after laparoscopic gastric bypass with circular stapled gastrojejunostomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(1):4–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of General Surgery, Department of SurgeryMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations