Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 33, Issue 7, pp 2235–2241 | Cite as

Surgical techniques and convalescence recommendations vary greatly in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a nationwide survey among experienced hernia surgeons

  • Line SchmidtEmail author
  • Kristoffer Andresen
  • Stina Öberg
  • Jacob Rosenberg



Laparoscopic groin hernia repair has become increasingly popular. In Denmark, all groin hernia repairs are registered in the Danish Hernia Database. However, many surgical technical parameters are not registered in neither the hernia database nor in other national registries or the patient files. Our aim was to characterize differences in surgical techniques and variations in convalescence recommendations in laparoscopic groin hernia repair that are not available elsewhere.


A questionnaire was sent to all surgeons in Denmark regularly performing unsupervised laparoscopic groin hernia repair. The questionnaire was developed in collaboration with an experienced chief surgeon and face-validated on the target group. It contained demographic details and items on surgical parameters such as the creation of pneumoperitoneum, size of the optic, choice of closure methods, preoperative information, and postoperative recommendation of convalescence.


A total of 71 surgeons were eligible for inclusion, and 61 (86%) responded. We found large variations in almost all surgical parameters, i.e. there was no uniform way of performing laparoscopic groin hernia repair. The variation was not due to the level of experience. The median recommended convalescence period was 1.5 (range 0–28) days for activities of daily living, 4.5 (range 0–28) days for light physical activity, and 14 (range 0–35) days for hard physical activity. Three percent of surgeons routinely informed patients about the risk of sexual dysfunction prior to operation, and 98% informed about the risk of chronic pain.


Surgical technical parameters and convalescence recommendations in laparoscopic groin hernia surgery vary widely in a national cohort of experienced hernia surgeons.


Inguinal hernia Laparoscopy Surgical training Questionnaire Standardization 


Compliance with ethical standards


Author Andresen reports personal fees from C.R. Bard, Inc. outside the submitted work. Author Rosenberg reports personal fees from C.R. Bard, Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc. outside the submitted work. The authors Öberg and Schmidt have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Forse RA (2015) Clinical practice. Groin hernias in adults. N Engl J Med 372:756–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kingsnorth A (2004) Treating inguinal hernias. BMJ 328:59–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosenberg J, Bay-Nielsen M (2008) Current status of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Denmark. Hernia 12:583–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wake BL, McCormack K, Fraser C, Vale L, Perez J, Grant AM (2005) Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004703Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Danish Hernia Database (2016) Annual Report from Danish Hernia Database. Accessed 31 May 2018
  7. 7.
    Andresen K, Friis-Andersen H, Rosenberg J (2016) Laparoscopic repair of primary inguinal hernia performed in public hospitals or low-volume centers have increased risk of reoperation for recurrence. Surg Innov 23:142–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friis-Andersen H, Bisgaard T (2016) The Danish inguinal hernia database. Clin Epidemiol 8:521–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kyle-Leinhase I, Kockerling F, Jorgensen LN, Montgomery A, Gillion JF, Rodriguez JAP, Hope W, Muysoms F (2018) Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project. Hernia. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2014) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 12:1495–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    International Endohernia Society (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25:2773–2843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    International Endohernia Society (2015) Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surg Endosc 29:289–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tonouchi H, Ohmori Y, Kobayashi M, Kusunoki M (2004) Trocar site hernia. Arch Surg 139:1248–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Thomsen H, Andersen FH, Bendix JH, Sorensen OK, Skovgaard N, Kehlet H (2004) Convalescence after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Surg 91:362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tolver MA, Strandfelt P, Forsberg G, Hjorne FP, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2012) Determinants of a short convalescence after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surgery 151:556–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gutlic N, Petersson U, Rogmark P, Montgomery A (2018) The relevance of sexual dysfunction related to groin pain after inguinal hernia repair: the SexIHQ short form questionnaire assessment. Front Surg. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aasvang EK, Mohl B, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2006) Pain related sexual dysfunction after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Pain 122:258–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schouten N, van Dalen T, Smakman N, Clevers GJ, Davids PH, Verleisdonk EJ, Tekatli H, Burgmans JP (2012) Impairment of sexual activity before and after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair. Surg Endosc 26:230–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tolver MA, Rosenberg J (2015) Pain during sexual activity before and after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 29:3722–3725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dilek ON (2014) Hernioplasty and testicular perfusion. SpringerPlus. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fitzgibbons RJ (2007) The mesh and the spermatic cord. In: Schumpelick V, Fitzgibbons RJ (eds) Recurrent hernia: prevention and treatment. Springer, Berlin, pp 333–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Livingston EH, Wislar JS (2012) Minimum response rates for survey research. Arch Surg 147:110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenHerlev, CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations