An enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery is associated with decreased organ level rates of complications: a difference-in-differences analysis
Perioperative care has lacked coordination and standardization. Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) have been shown to decrease aggregate complications across surgical specialties. We hypothesize that the sustained implementation of an ERP will be associated with a decrease in a broad range of complications at the organ system level.
Adult patients undergoing elective colorectal procedures between 1/2011 and 10/2016 were included. Patients were stratified based on exposure to a sustained ERP (7/2014–10/2016) after an 18-month wash-in period in a pre-post analysis. The primary outcome was 30-day complication rate by organ category as collected by National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) abstractors. Demographic and other patient level data were collected. Complication rates were compared using multivariable regression employing a differences-in-differences (DiD) approach using the national NSQIP PUF file to account for secular trends.
A total of 1182 patients were included in this study, with 47% treated in an ERP. The two groups were similar in age, gender, race, BMI, comorbidity index, and procedure type. In a multivariable DiD analysis, significant reductions were seen in surgical site infection (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.20–0.43), postoperative pulmonary complications (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24–0.90), transfusion (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.15–0.51), urinary tract infections (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.18–0.66), sepsis (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.20–0.61), and cardiac complications (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.01–0.84). A reduction in return to the operating room and 30-day readmission was also observed. Median length of stay (LOS) decreased from 5.2 to 3.5 days (p < 0.001). No significant changes occurred for acute kidney injury and hematologic complications.
An ERP was associated with reduced complication rates across a wide range of organ categories and > 1.5-day reduction in LOS in a colorectal surgery population.
KeywordsColorectal surgery Outcomes Enhanced recovery after surgery Enhanced recovery program Surgical site infection Perioperative care
Compliance with ethical standards
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors. Drs. Alexander T. Hawkins, Timothy M. Geiger, Adam B. King, Jonathan P. Wanderer, Vikram Tiwari, Roberta L. Muldoon, Molly M. Ford, Roger R. Dmochowski, Warren S. Sandberg M. Benjamin Hopkins, Matthew D. McEvoy, and Ms. Barbara Martin have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 22.Program ACoSNSQI (2016) ACS NSQIP® semiannual report. American College of Surgeons, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 23.Program ACoSNSQI (2016) User guide for the 2015 ACS NSQIp participant use data file. https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/nsqip/nsqip_puf_user_guide_2015.ashx. Accessed 5 Jul 2017
- 32.Huang J (2014) Enhanced recovery after surgery. AANA J 82(4):259–261Google Scholar
- 38.Medicine IoMURoE-B (2010) The healthcare imperative: lowering costs and improving outcomes: workshop series summary. National Academies Press (US), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar