Surgical techniques for advanced transverse colon cancer using the pincer approach of the transverse mesocolon
Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, not only early cancer but also advanced cancer, has become standardized by some randomized controlled studies. However, cases involving advanced transverse colon cancer were excluded from these studies due to the technical difficulty of the surgery. Hence, laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse colon cancer is still a theme that we need to overcome. To solve these issues, it is necessary to establish a standardized approach and surgical technique.
The advantage of our method, which approaches from both sides of the transverse mesocolon, is that it is easier to achieve hemostasis when active bleeding occurs because this approach provides space for ligating and sealing. This allows the surgeon to perform lymphadenectomy around the superior mesenteric artery and vein.
We introduced the usefulness of the “Pincer approach of the transverse mesocolon” to standardize laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse colon cancer.
KeywordsLaparoscopic surgery Colon cancer Transverse colon cancer Pincer approach
HE participated in treatment of these patients, literature search, drafting the manuscript, making the video. IN participated in treatment of these patients and helped to do data analysis. MH helped to do data analysis. SM, MK, KT, HS, and SM participated in treatment of these patients. HO participated in treatment planning of these patients. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Drs. Hiroyuki Egi, Ikki Nakashima, Minoru Hattori, Shoichiro Mukai, Masatoshi Kochi, Kazuhiro Taguchi, Haruki Sada, Yusuke Sumi, Hideki Ohdan have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Patients were given written informed consent prior to surgery. This study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration Guidelines with the approval of the Ethics Committee of Hiroshima University Hospital.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 263982 KB)
- 2.Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):655–662 (discussion 662-664).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Deijen CL, Vasmel JE, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, Cuesta MA, Coene PLO, Lange JF, Meijerink WJHJ, Jakimowicz JJ, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Janssen IMC, Påhlman L, Haglind E, Bonjer HJ, COLOR (COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection) Study Group (2017) Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 31(6):2607–2615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kitano S, Inomata M, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Ito M, Saito S, Fujii S, Konishi F, Saida Y, Hasegawa H, Akagi T, Sugihara K, Yamaguchi T, Masaki T, Fukunaga Y, Murata K, Okajima M, Moriya Y, Shimada Y (2017) Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(4):261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar