A prospective study of the safety and usefulness of a new miniature wide-angle camera: the “BirdView camera system”
- 106 Downloads
The performance of endoscopic surgery has quickly become widespread as a minimally invasive therapy. However, complications still occur due to technical difficulties. In the present study, we focused on the problem of blind spots, which is one of the several problems that occur during endoscopic surgery and developed “BirdView,” a camera system with a wide field of view, with SHARP Corporation.
In the present study, we conducted a clinical trial (Phase I) to confirm the safety and usefulness of the BirdView camera system. We herein report the results.
In this study, surgical adverse events were reported in 2 cases (problems with ileus and urination). There were no cases of device failure, damage to the surrounding organs, or mortality.
We evaluated the safety of the BirdView camera system. We believe that this camera system will contribute to the performance safe endoscopic surgery and the execution of robotic surgery, in which operators do not have the benefit of tactile feedback.
KeywordsEndoscopic surgery Laparoscopic surgery Wide-view camera Medical accident Medical safety
New wide-view minimum camera system was supplied by SHARP corporation.
YS participated in treatment of these patients, literature search, and draft the manuscript. HE participated in treatment of these patients and helped to draft the manuscript. MH helped to do statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. TS, MT, TA, HS, and SM participated in treatment of these patients. YK advised to us as an engineer. HO participated in treatment planning of these patients. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
We jointly developed equipment. SHARP corporation owns the production cost. The test was conducted with the provision of SHARP corporation’s equipment. We have not received funds or reward from SHARP corporation. Drs. Yusuke Sumi, Hiroyuki Egi, Minoru Hattori, Takahisa Suzuki, Masakazu Tokunaga, Tomohiro Adachi, Hiroyuki Sawada, Shoichiro Mukai, Yuichi Kurita, and Hideki Ohdan have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 93877 KB)
- 1.Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, Group CIS (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, Sugihara K, Watanabe M, Moriya Y, Kitano S, Japan Clinical Oncology Group Colorectal Cancer Study G (2014) Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg 260:23–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kambakamba P, Dindo D, Nocito A, Clavien PA, Seifert B, Schafer M, Hahnloser D (2014) Intraoperative adverse events during laparoscopic colorectal resection–better laparoscopic treatment but unchanged incidence. Lessons learnt from a Swiss multi-institutional analysis of 3,928 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:297–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar