Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 10, pp 4344–4350 | Cite as

Intracorporeal delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy in reduced-port robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy: technical aspects and short-term outcomes

  • Joong Ho Lee
  • Taeil SonEmail author
  • Jisu Kim
  • Won Jun Seo
  • Chul Kyu Rho
  • Minah Cho
  • Hyoung-Il Kim
  • Woo Jin Hyung
Dynamic Manuscript
  • 381 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Gastroduodenostomy is preferred as a method of reconstruction following distal subtotal gastrectomy. However, in initial reports on reduced-port gastrectomy, gastroduodenostomy has rarely been performed therein because of technical difficulties. The present study describes a novel intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy technique applicable during reduced-port robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy.

Methods

Data were retrospectively reviewed for cases of reduced-port (three-port) robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with intracorporeal delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy performed from February 2016 to December 2016. The reduced-port approach used a Single-Site™ port via a 25-mm infraumbilical incision and two additional ports. We performed intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy using a 45-mm robotic or laparoscopic endolinear stapler. All staplers were inserted via a port on the left lower abdomen.

Results

In our initial experience with intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy, 28 consecutive patients underwent successful surgery with the technique without needing to convert to open, laparoscopic, or conventional five-port robotic surgery. Mean operation time was 201.1 min (110–282 min), and no major complications, including anastomosis-related problems, were recorded.

Conclusions

Intracorporeal delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy was safely and feasibly applied during reduced-port robotic gastrectomy with acceptable operative outcomes and no major complications. Intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy should be considered during reduced-port distal subtotal gastrectomy.

Keywords

Gastroduodenostomy Robot stapler Reduced-port surgery Gastric cancer 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a faculty research grant from Yonsei University College of Medicine (6-2016-0109).

Author contributions

JHL and TS designed the study; JHL, JK, WJS, CKR, and TS collected all materials; JHL, JK, and TS drafted the paper; and MC, HIK, and WJH critically revised subsequent drafts. All authors have read and approved the submission manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Drs. Chul Kyu Rho, Hyoung-Il Kim, Jisu Kim, Joong Ho Lee, Minah Cho, Taeil Son, Won Jun Seo, and Woo Jin Hyung have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplemental Digital Content 1.mp4: Representative view of intracorporeal delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy using endolinear staplers during reduced-port robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy. (MP4 254934 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, Tori M, Ueshima S, Nishida T (2011) Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 25(7):2400–2404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee S, Kim JK, Kim YN, Jang DS, Kim YM, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI (2017) Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial. Surg Endosc 31(10):4002–4009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanaya S, Gomi T, Momoi H, Tamaki N, Isobe H, Katayama T, Wada Y, Ohtoshi M (2002) Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy: new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy. J Am Coll Surg 195(2):284–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahn SH, Son SY, Jung DH, Park DJ, Kim HH (2014) Pure single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: comparative study with multi-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 219(5):933–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Usui S, Tashiro M, Haruki S, Matsumoto A (2014) Triple-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for the resection of gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 7(3):197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kashiwagi H, Kumagai K, Monma E, Nozue M (2015) Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 29(6):1321–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim SM, Ha MH, Seo JE, Kim JE, Choi MG, Sohn TS, Bae JM, Kim S, Lee JH (2015) Comparison of reduced port totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (duet TLDG) and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 22(8):2567–2572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shibao K, Sato N, Higure A, Yamaguchi K (2015) A new oval multichannel port to facilitate reduced port distal gastrectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 24(3):135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee CM, Park DW, Park S, Kim JH, Park SH, Kim CS (2017) Lymph node dissection using bipolar vessel-sealing device during reduced port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: result of a pilot study from a single institute. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(11):1101–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study G (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263(1):28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Takagi M, Yoshikawa T, Fukagawa T, Terashima M, Misawa K, Teshima S, Koeda K, Nunobe S, Fukushima N, Yasuda T, Asao Y, Fujiwara Y, Sasako M (2017) Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 20(4):699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Obama K, Kim YM, Kang DR, Son T, Kim HI, Noh SH, Hyung WJ (2017) Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 21(2):285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee JH, Hyung WJ, Kim HI, Kim YM, Son T, Okumura N, Hu Y, Kim CB, Noh SH (2013) Method of reconstruction governs iron metabolism after gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg 258(6):964–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim BJ, O’Connell T (1999) Gastroduodenostomy after gastric resection for cancer. Am Surg 65(10):905–907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park DJ, Lee HJ, Kim HH, Yang HK, Lee KU, Choe KJ (2005) Predictors of operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 92(9):1099–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumagai K, Shimizu K, Yokoyama N, Aida S, Arima S, Aikou T, Japanese Society for the Study of Postoperative Morbidity after G (2012) Questionnaire survey regarding the current status and controversial issues concerning reconstruction after gastrectomy in Japan. Surg Today 42(5):411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Information Committee of Korean Gastric Cancer A (2016) Korean gastric cancer association nationwide survey on gastric cancer in 2014. J Gastric Cancer 16(3):131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryNational Health Insurance Service Ilsan HospitalGoyangRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Gastric Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer CenterYonsei University Health SystemSeoulRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.Robot and MIS Center, Severance HospitalYonsei University Health SystemSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations