Examining the impact of surgical coaching on trainee physiologic response and basic skill acquisition
We examined how problem-solving coaching impacts trainee skill acquisition and physiologic stress as well as how trainee sensitivity to feedback, known as self-monitoring ability, impacts coaching effectiveness.
Medical students completed a pre-training demographics questionnaire, a 12-item self-monitoring ability scale (1 = always false, 5 = always true), and baseline FLS Task 5 with physiologic sensors. After watching a laparoscopic suturing instructional video, students practiced the task for 30 min, either with a surgical coach, or alone, depending on condition. The coach logged frequency of coaching behaviors according to a task-specific coaching script. Trainees then completed FLS Task 5 with physiologic sensors, a post-training questionnaire, and a 12-item coaching quality evaluation (1 = poor, 5 = very good).
Twenty-four students (age 24.5 ± 1.4; 54% men; 58% MS4) participated in the study. All were fairly high self-monitors (3.8 ± 0.76). No differences in baseline suturing skills between the groups emerged. Improvement in the coaching group‘s suturing (N = 12; 285.0 ± 79.9) was significantly higher than the control group (N = 12; 200.9 ± 110.3). One measure of physiologic stress (rMSSD) was significantly higher in the coaching group. Trainees who received more coaching demonstrated larger improvements (r = 0.7, p < 0.05). Overall ,perceived quality of the coaching relationship was high (4.4 ± 0.6). There was no correlation between trainee self-monitoring ability and skill improvement.
This work suggests that coaching may increase heart rate variability of trainees, indicating coping well with training. Trainee disposition toward feedback did not play a role in this relationship.
KeywordsCoaching Stress Physiologic stress Eustress Self-monitoring
Heart rate variability
We thank Ibrahim I. Jabbour, MD for serving as the coach in this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Dr. Gardner has ownership interest in SurgWise Consulting, LLC. Dr. Timberlake, and Dr. Stefanidis has no relevant conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Parsloe E (1999) The manager as coach and mentor. CIPD Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 2.Cole SJ, Mackenzie H, Ha J, Hanna GB, Miskovic D (2014) Randomized controlled trial on the effect of coaching in simulated laparoscopic training. Surg Endosc 28(3):979–986Google Scholar
- 11.Snyder M, Gangestad S (1986) On the nature of self-monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(1):125–139Google Scholar
- 13.Reilly R, Warech M, Reilly S (1993) The influence of self-monitoring on the reliability and validity of upward feedback. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 15.Magill RA, Anderson D (2007) Motor learning and control: concepts and applications. vol 11, McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 17.Available at: http://www.flsprogram.org. Accessed 23 Jan 2016
- 20.Gregory JB, Levy PE (2010) Employee coaching relationships: enhancing construct clarity and measurement. Coaching 3(2):109–123Google Scholar
- 24.Fitts PM, Posner MI (1967) Human performance. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
- 25.O’Connor A, Schwaitzberg S, Cao C (2008) How much feedback is necessary for learning to suture? Surg Endosc 22(7):1614–1619Google Scholar
- 27.Soucisse ML, Boulva K, Sideris L, Drolet P, Morin M, Dubé P (2016) Video coaching as an efficient teaching method for surgical residents—a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Educ 74(2):365–371Google Scholar
- 28.Hmelo-Silver CE, Duncan RG, Chinn CA (2006) Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educ Psychol 42(2):99–107Google Scholar
- 37.Cardiology TFotESo (1996) Heart rate variability standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J 17:354–381Google Scholar
- 38.Salahuddin L, Cho J, Jeong MG, Kim D (2007) Ultra short term analysis of heart rate variability for monitoring mental stress in mobile settings. Paper presented at: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEEGoogle Scholar
- 39.Gharbi A, Hey S, Jatoba L et al. (2008) System for body and mind monitoring in coaching process. Paper presented at: Medical Devices and Biosensors, 2008. ISSS-MDBS 2008. 5th International Summer School and Symposium on 2008Google Scholar
- 40.Schaaff K, Adam MT (2013) Measuring emotional arousal for online applications: evaluation of ultra-short term heart rate variability measures. Paper presented at: Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), Humaine Association Conference on 2013Google Scholar
- 41.Mayya S, Jilla V, Tiwari VN, Nayak MM, Narayanan R (2015) Continuous monitoring of stress on smartphone using heart rate variability. Paper presented at: Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), IEEE 15th International Conference on 2015Google Scholar
- 45.Leung Y, Salfinger S, Tan JJS, Frazer A (2013) The introduction and the validation of a surgical encounter template to facilitate surgical coaching of gynaecologists at a metropolitan tertiary obstetrics and gynaecology hospital. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 53(5):477–483Google Scholar
- 50.Sutkin G, Littleton EB, Kanter SL (2015) How surgical mentors teach: a classification of in vivo teaching behaviors part 1: verbal teaching guidance. J Surg Educ 72(2):243–250Google Scholar