Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 10, pp 4111–4115 | Cite as

Laparoscopic Hill repair: 25-year follow-up

  • Yeseul Park
  • Ralph W. AyeEmail author
  • Jeffrey R. Watkins
  • Alex S. Farivar
  • Brian E. Louie



The open Hill repair for gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia is remarkably durable, with a median 10-year reoperation rate of only 3% and satisfaction of 93%. No long-term data exist for the laparoscopic Hill repair (LHR).


Patients who underwent primary LHR at Swedish Medical Center for reflux and/or hiatal hernia at least 5 years earlier (1992–2010) were identified from an IRB-approved database. There were 727 patients who met inclusion criteria, including 648 undergoing repair for reflux and 79 for paraesophageal hernia. Two questionnaires were administered via mail to evaluate long-term quality of life using validated GERD-HRQL, Swallowing score, and global satisfaction score. Outcomes were defined by GERD-HRQL score, Swallowing score, resumption of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, need for reoperation, and global satisfaction with overall results.


Two hundred forty-two patients completed and returned the survey (226 lost to follow-up, 90 deceased, 3 denied undergoing LHR, 166 non-responders), of which 52% were male. The average age at the time of surgery was 49.5 years. Median follow-up was 18.5 years (range 6.2–24.7). The average GERD-HRQL score (7.1) and the average Swallowing score (39.9) both indicated excellent symptomatic outcomes. 30% of patients are using daily PPIs. 24 patients (9.9%) required reoperation for failure during the follow-up period, 21 in the reflux group and 3 in the paraesophageal hernia group. Overall, 85% reported good to excellent results, and 76% would recommend the operation.


LHR shows excellent long-term durability and quality of life similar to the open Hill repair, with 85% good to excellent results at a median follow-up of 19 years and a reoperation rate under 10%. It is surmised that Hill suture fixation of the gastroesophageal junction to the preaortic fascia may confer unique structural integrity compared to other repairs.


Hill Laparoscopy Long-term Antireflux Paraesophageal hernia Fundoplication 



This work was partially supported by funding for research personnel from the Ryan Hill Research Foundation and the Foundation for Surgical Fellowships.

Compliance with Ethical Standards


The authors Yeseul Park, Ralph W Aye, Jeffrey R Watkins, Alex S Farivar, and Brian E Louie have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Aye RW, Rehse D, Blitz M, Kraemer SJ, Hill LD (2011) The Hill antireflux repair at 5 institutions over 25 years. Am J Surg 201:597–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Velanovich V (2007) The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus 20:130–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dakkak M, Bennett J (1992) A new dysphagia score with objective validation. J Clin Gastroenterol 14:99–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aye RW, Gupta A (2015) The Hill antireflux operations repair and its variants. In: Swanstrom LL, Dunst CM (eds) Antireflux surgery. Springer, New York, NY, pp 117–126Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aye RW, Hill LD, Kraemer SJ, Snopkowski P (1994) Early results with the laparoscopic Hill repair. Am J Surg 165(5):542–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aye RW, Swanstrom LL, Kapur S, Buduhan G, Dunst CM, Knight A, Malmgren JA, Louie BE (2012) A randomized multiinstitution comparison of the laparoscopic Nissen and Hill repairs. Ann Thorac Surg 94(3):951–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schneider AM, Aye RW, Wilshire CL, Farivar AS, Louie BE (2017) Tri-comparison of laparoscopic nissen, hill, and nissen-hill hybrid repairs for uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 21:434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jobe BA, Aye RW, Deveney CW, Domreis JS, Hill LD (2002) Laparoscopic management of giant type III hiatal hernia and short esophagus. Objective follow-up at three years. J Gastrointest Surg 6(2):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aye RW, Mazza DE, Hill LD (1997) Laparoscopic Hill repair in patients with abnormal motility. Am J Surg 173(5):379–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levy G, Aye RW, Farivar AS, Louie BE (2017) A combined nissen plus hill hybrid repair for paraesophageal hernia improves clinical outcomes and reduces long-term recurrences compared with laparoscopic nissen alone. J Gastrointest Surg 21(1):121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robinson B, Dunst CM, Cassera MA, Reavis KM, Sharata A, Swanstrom LL (2015) 20 years later: laparoscopic fundoplication durability. Surg Endosc 29(9):2520–2524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salminen PT, Hiekkanen HI, Rantala AP, Ovaska JT (2007) Comparison of long-term outcome of laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication. Ann Surg 246(2):201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dallemagne B, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Dewandre JM, Wahlen C, Monami B, Jehaes C (2006) Clinical results of laparoscopic fundoplication at 10 years after surgery. Surg Endosc 20:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kornmo TS, Ruud TE (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication due to gastroesophageal reflux disease. A ten year follow-up in a low volume center. Scand J Surg 97:227–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khajanchee YS, O’Rourke RW, Lockhart BA, Patterson EJ, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL (2002) Postoperative symptoms and failure following antireflux surgery. Arch Surg 137(9):1008–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Borgaonkar MR, Irvine EJ (2000) Quality-of-life measurement in gastrointestinal and liver disorders. Gut 47:444–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yeseul Park
    • 1
  • Ralph W. Aye
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jeffrey R. Watkins
    • 1
  • Alex S. Farivar
    • 1
  • Brian E. Louie
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Thoracic SurgerySwedish Cancer Institute and Medical CenterSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations