Early experience and learning curve of solo single-incision distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a review of consecutive 100 cases
Single-incision distal gastrectomy (SIDG) is technically difficult due to limited range of motion and unstable field of view. Solo surgery using a passive scope holder may be the key in allowing SIDG to be safer and efficient. We report our initial 100 cases of, to what we know, the world’s first solo SIDG, and calculate the learning curve.
Prospectively collected database of 100 patients clinically diagnosed as gastric cancer who underwent solo SIDG from October 2013 until July 2016 was analyzed. All the operations were held by a single surgeon with no assistants. A passive laparoscopic scope holder was used to fix the field of view.
The mean operation time was 120.6 ± 30.2 min, and the average estimated blood loss was 33.5 ± 55.7 ml. Average body mass index was 23.4 ± 2.9 kg/m2. The median hospital stay was 5 (4–14) days, and the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 56.0 ± 22.8. There was no conversion to multiport or open surgery. Early complication of Clavien–Dindo grade III or more was 3%. Learning curve was calculated on operation time, and showed that an experienced surgeon in SIDG required 20 cases or less in stabilizing the operation time for solo SIDG.
Solo SIDG seems to be feasible and safe. The stable field of view created by a scope holder provides a favorable environment for a finer and more consistent operation. In addition, manpower can also be saved without affecting the quality of surgery.
KeywordsLaparoscopic surgery Gastrectomy Stomach neoplasm Robotics Learning curve
Compliance with ethical standards
So Hyun Kang, Yo-Seok Cho, Sa-Hong Min, Young Suk Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Do Joong Park, and Hyung-Ho Kim have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 15.Kodera Y, Sano T (2016) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 20:1–19Google Scholar
- 16.Irino T (2015) The Hit and Away technique: optimal usage of the ultrasonic scalpel in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 30:1–6Google Scholar
- 19.Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24:1842–1848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Abdelrahman AM, Bingener J, Yu D, Lowndes BR, Mohamed A, McConico AL, Hallbeck MS (2016) Impact of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) procedures on surgeon stress and workload: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 30:1205–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kim W, Kim H-H, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang H-K, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee H-J, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2016) decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Antoniou SA, Morales-Conde S, Antoniou GA, Granderath FA, Berrevoet F, Muysoms FE, Bonham Group (2016) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hernia 20:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar