Advertisement

Marginal ulcer continues to be a major source of morbidity over time following gastric bypass

  • Owen Pyke
  • Jie Yang
  • Tyler Cohn
  • Donglei Yin
  • Salvatore Docimo
  • Mark A. Talamini
  • Andrew T. Bates
  • Aurora Pryor
  • Konstantinos SpaniolasEmail author
2018 SAGES Oral

Abstract

Background

Marginal ulcerations (MU) are a common and concerning complication following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. The aim of the present study was to examine the progression of MU and identify risk factors for the need for surgical intervention in patients with MU following RYGB.

Methods

A New York state longitudinal administrative database was queried to identify patients who underwent RYGB between 2005 and 2010 and who were followed for at least 4 years for the development of MU using ICD-9 and CPT codes. Patients with perforation as their first presentation of MU were excluded. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was built to identify risk factors for surgical intervention. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.

Results

We identified 35,075 patients who underwent RYGB. Mean age was 42.47 ± 10.90 years and most were female (81.08%). There were 2201 (6.28%) patients with MU, of which 204 (9.27% of MU; 0.58% of RYGB overall) required surgery. The estimated cumulative incidence of having surgical intervention 1, 2, 5, and 8 years after MU diagnosis was 6% (95% CI 5–7%), 8% (95% CI 7–9%), 13% (95% CI 11–14%), and 17% (95% CI 13–20%), respectively. At time of MU diagnosis, younger age (HR 0.93 every 5 years, 95% CI 0.87–0.99), white race (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.15–2.23), and weight loss (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.62–4.88) were independent risk factors for subsequent surgical intervention for MU. Estimated cumulative incidence of MU recurrence was 15% (95% CI 9–22%) and 24% (95 CI% 15–32%) at 6 and 12 months after surgical intervention.

Conclusions

The need for surgical intervention for MU after RYGB is uncommon. Young age, white race, and marked weight loss are risk factors for surgical intervention. Such patients may benefit from early intensive medical therapy at the time of MU diagnosis.

Keywords

Marginal ulcer Gastric bypass Anastomotic ulcer 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the biostatistical consultation and support provided by the Biostatistical Consulting Core at School of Medicine, Stony Brook University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Dr. Aurora Pryor receives honoraria for speaking for Ethicon, Medtronic, Stryker, and Gore, and is a consultant for Medicines Company, Merck, Intuitive, BAROnova, Obalon Therapeutics. Dr. Pryor also has ownership interest in Transenterix. Dr. Konstantinos Spaniolas is on the advisory board for Mallincktodt and received a research grant from Merck. Donglei Yin, Drs. Owen Pyke, Jie Yang, Tyler Cohn, Salvatore Docimo, Andrew Bates, and Mark Talamini have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Nanni G, Castagneto M, Bornstein S, Rubino F (2015) Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus conventional medical treatment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 5 year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386:964–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Leccesi L, Nanni G, Pomp A, Castagneto M, Ghirlanda G, Rubino F (2012) Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 366:1577–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Surgery American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (2016) Estimate of bariatric surgery numbers, 2011–2016Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dallal RM, Bailey LA (2006) Ulcer disease after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2:455–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sapala JA, Wood MH, Sapala MA, Flake TM Jr (1998) Marginal ulcer after gastric bypass: a prospective 3-year study of 173 patients. Obes Surg 8:505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    MacLean LD, Rhode BM, Nohr C, Katz S, McLean AP (1997) Stomal ulcer after gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 185:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coblijn UK, Lagarde SM, de Castro SM, Kuiken SD, van Wagensveld BA (2015) Symptomatic marginal ulcer disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: incidence, risk factors and management. Obes Surg 25:805–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bendewald FP, Choi JN, Blythe LS, Selzer DJ, Ditslear JH, Mattar SG (2011) Comparison of hand-sewn, linear-stapled, and circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 21:1671–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Altieri MS, Pryor A, Yang J, Yin D, Docimo S, Bates A, Talamini M, Spaniolas K (2018) The natural history of perforated marginal ulcers after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Endosc 32:1215–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patel RA, Brolin RE, Gandhi A (2009) Revisional operations for marginal ulcer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    El-Hayek K, Timratana P, Shimizu H, Chand B (2012) Marginal ulcer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: what have we really learned? Surg Endosc 26:2789–2796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moon RC, Teixeira AF, Goldbach M, Jawad MA (2014) Management and treatment outcomes of marginal ulcers after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at a single high volume bariatric center. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Racu C, Dutson EP, Mehran A (2010) Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision: a novel approach to intractable marginal ulcer management. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:557–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lo Menzo E, Stevens N, Kligman M (2011) Laparoscopic revision of gastrojejunostomy and vagotomy for intractable marginal ulcer after revised gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:656–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wendling MR, Linn JG, Keplinger KM, Mikami DJ, Perry KA, Melvin WS, Needleman BJ (2013) Omental patch repair effectively treats perforated marginal ulcer following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 27:384–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang PC, Huang CK, Tai CM, Huang IY, Hsin MC, Hung CM (2017) Revision using totally hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy and truncal vagotomy for refractory marginal ulcer after laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass: a case series. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:588–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Owen Pyke
    • 1
    return OK on get
  • Jie Yang
    • 2
  • Tyler Cohn
    • 1
  • Donglei Yin
    • 3
  • Salvatore Docimo
    • 1
  • Mark A. Talamini
    • 1
  • Andrew T. Bates
    • 1
  • Aurora Pryor
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Spaniolas
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Bariatric, Foregut and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of SurgeryStony Brook University Medical CenterStony BrookUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family, Population and Preventive MedicineStony Brook University Medical CenterStony BrookUSA
  3. 3.Department of Applied Mathematics and StatisticsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations