Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis
- 510 Downloads
The purpose of the study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCBDE+LC) with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (pre-ERCP+LC) for cholecystocholedocholithiasis.
An electronic search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov until 1 July 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LCBDE+LC versus pre-ERCP+LC were included. The common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance rate, postoperative bile leakage, postoperative pancreatitis, morbidity, mortality, and overall hospital stay were analyzed.
Twelve RCTs involving 1545 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Of the 12 RCTs, seven confirmed and five did not confirm CBD stones preoperatively. The meta-analysis showed a significantly higher CBD stone clearance rate for pre-ERCP+LC than LCBDE+LC. A similar result was found in the subgroup analysis of patients with confirmed CBD stones. A significantly lower postoperative bile leakage rate was found for pre-ERCP+LC than LCBDE+LC in all 12 RCTs and in the subgroup of patients with confirmed CBD stones. However, a significantly higher rate of pancreatitis was found in pre-ERCP+LC and in the subgroup of patients with confirmed CBD stones. LCBDE+LC was superior to pre-ERCP+LC in terms of the overall hospital stay. No significant differences were found in morbidity or mortality.
Pre-ERCP+LC is associated with a higher CBD stone clearance rate, lower postoperative bile leakage rate, and higher rate of pancreatitis. LCBDE+LC might help to shorten the hospital stay. Further studies on this topic are recommended.
KeywordsCommon bile duct stones Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Meta-analysis Systematic review
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Compliance with ethical standards
Yunxiao Lyu, Yunxiao Cheng, Ting Li, Bin Cheng, and in Jin have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239(1):28–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103069.00170.9c CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Parra-Membrives P, Martinez-Baena D, Lorente-Herce J, Jimenez-Riera G (2018) Comparative study of three bile duct closure methods following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 28(2):145–151. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0433 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Wang B, Xu Y, Du W (2018) What is impact of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 18(1):106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0837-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Mattila A, Mrena J, Kellokumpu I (2017) Cost-analysis and effectiveness of one-stage laparoscopic versus two-stage endolaparoscopic management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg 17(1):79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0274-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Singh AN, Kilambi R (2018) Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis. Surg Endosc 32(9):3763–3776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6170-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Wang B, Guo Z, Liu Z, Wang Y, Si Y, Zhu Y, Jin M (2013) Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones: system review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27(7):2454–2465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2757-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.El Nakeeb A, El Geidie A, El Hanafy E, Atef E, Askar W, Sultan AM, Hamdy E, El Shobary M, Hamed H, Abdelrafee A, Zeid MA (2016) Management and outcome of borderline common bile duct with stones: a prospective randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 26(3):161–167. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2015.0493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Ferulano 2011.pdf.Google Scholar
- 25.Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, Kilambi R, Kumar S, Krishna A, Kumar A, Pandav CS, Subramaniam R, Arora MK, Garg PK (2014) Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 28(3):875–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3237-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Barreras Gonzalez JE, Torres Pena R, Ruiz Torres J, Martinez Alfonso MA, Brizuela Quintanilla R, Morera Perez M (2016) Endoscopic versus laparoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open 4(11):E1188–E1193. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-116144 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 27.Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13(10):952–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Koc B, Karahan S, Adas G, Tutal F, Guven H, Ozsoy A (2013) Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 206(4):457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.02.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, Norton S, Thompson M (2009) A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 19(6):713–720. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2008.0428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, Siperstein AE, Schecter WP, Campbell AR, Mackersie RC, Rodas A, Kreuwel HT, Harris HW (2010) Prospective randomized trial of LC + LCBDE vs ERCP/S + LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 145(1):28–33. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.226 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Pan L, Chen M, Ji L, Zheng L, Yan P, Fang J, Zhang B, Cai X (2018) The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with cholecystectomy for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: an up-to-date meta-analysis. Ann Surg 268(2):247–253. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002731 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Podda M, Polignano FM, Luhmann A, Wilson MS, Kulli C, Tait IS (2016) Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 30(3):845–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4303-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar