Hartmann procedure consists in a sigmoidectomy followed by a terminal colostomy. However, the stoma is associated with complications and suboptimal quality of life, so the restoration of colonic continuity should be, at least, considered in any case. Open restoration has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality; therefore, many authors have described the advantages of laparoscopic Hartmann reversal. We want to go a step further showing our experience using a combined laparoscopic and transanal approach in an attempt to improve the surgical technique.
Patients with an end colostomy due to an emergency Hartmann procedure are selected for this intervention. This approach is performed simultaneously laparoscopically and transanally, with single-port devices, through the colostomy wound in the first case and trough anal canal in the second one. The previous stapler line is resected transanally and the proximal rectum and mesorectum are dissected until the peritoneal reflexion, where both teams work together to complete the adhesiolysis. Finally an end-to-end anastomosis is performed under laparoscopic control.
As in patients with rectal cancer, dissection of the stump in Hartmann reversal procedure may be better and associated with shorter operative time.
As with any new surgical procedure, it is probably too early to draw conclusions, but nowadays transanal combined with laparoscopic approach seems to be a safe and feasible technique to perform a Hartmann reversal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
van de Wall BJ, Draaisma WA, Schouten ES, Broeders IA, Consten EC (2010) Conventional and laparoscopic reversal of the Hartmann procedure: a review of literature. J Gastrointest Surg 14:743–752
Maggard MA, Aingmond D, O’Connell JB, Ko CY (2004) What proportion of patients with an ostomy (for diverticulitis) get reversed? Am Surg 70:928–931
Carus Th, Emmert A (2011) Single-port laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: technique and results. Minimal Invasiv Surg. doi:10.1155/2011/356784
Holland JC, Winter DC, Richardson D (2002) Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure revisited. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(4):291–294
Khaikin M, Zmora O, Rosin D, Bar-Zakai B, Goldes Y, Shabtai M, Ayalon A, Munz Y (2006) Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Surg Endosc 20:1883–1886
Riansuwan W, Hull TL, Millan MM, Hammel JP (2009) Non-reversal of Hartmann’s procedure for diverticulitis: derivation of a scoring system to predict nonreversal. Dis Colon Rectum 52(8):1400–1408
Banerjee S, Leather AJ, Rennie JA, Samano N, Gonzalez JG, Papagrigoriadis S (2005) Feasibility and morbidity of reversal of Hartmann’s. Colorectal Dis 7(5):454–459
Fucini C, Gattai R, Urena C, Bandettini L, Elbetti C (2008) Quality of life among five-year survivors after treatment for very low rectal cancer with or without a permanent abdominal stoma. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1099–1106
Vermeulen J, Gosselink MP, Busschbach JJ, Lange JF (2010) Avoiding or reversing Hartmann’s procedure provides improved quality of life after perforated diverticulitis. J Gastrointest Surg 14(4):651–657
Gorey TF, O’Connell PR, Waldron D, Cronin K, Kerin M, Fitzpatrick JM (1993) Laparoscopically assisted colostomy closure after Hartmann’s procedure. Br J Surg 80:109
Bozzetti F, Nava M, Bufalino R, Menotti V, Marolda R, Doci R, Gennari L (1983) Early local complications following colostomy closure in cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum 26:25–29
Ghorra SG, Rzeczycki TP, Natarajan R, Pricolo VE (1999) Colostomy closure: impact of preoperative risk factors on morbidity. Am Surg 65:266–269
Siddiqui MRS, Sajid MS, Baig MK (2010) Open vs laparoscopic approach for reversal of Hartmann´s procedure: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 12:733–741
Arkenbosch J, Miyagaki H, Shantha Kumara HM, Yan X, Cekic V, Whelan RL (2015) Efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted approach for reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Surg Endosc 29(8):2109–2114
Fernández-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A, Tasende M, Momblan D, del Gobbo GD, de Lacy B, Balust J, Lacy AM (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261(2):221–227
Velthuis S, Veltcamp Helbach M, Tuynman JB, Le TN, Bonjer HJ, Sietses C (2015) Intra-abdominal bacterial contamination in TAMIS total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: a prospective study. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4089-x
Authors R. Bravo, M. Fernández-Hevia, M. Jiménez-Toscano, L. F. Flores, B. de Lacy, S. Quaresima and A.M. Lacy have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Bravo, R., Fernández-Hevia, M., Jiménez-Toscano, M. et al. Transanal Hartmann reversal: a new technique. Surg Endosc 30, 2628–2631 (2016) doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4504-3
- Hartmann reversal
- Trasanal total mesorectal excision
- Rectal cancer