Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp 1816–1825 | Cite as

Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution

  • George Molina
  • Liliana Bordeianou
  • Paul Shellito
  • Patricia SyllaEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

Peritoneal entry during transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) can usually be managed transanally with full-thickness suture closure by experienced operators. The preliminary safety of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) has been demonstrated, but the reported experience with upper rectal tumors is limited. The incidence and management of peritoneal entry during transanal endoscopic surgery across various platforms have not been previously evaluated.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all transanal endoscopic resections performed at a single institution between January 2008 and December 2014 was conducted. Cases with and without peritoneal entry were evaluated with respect to transanal platform used, surgical indication, size, location and distance from the anal verge, and incidence of postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 78 transanal endoscopic procedures were performed on 76 patients using the rigid transanal endoscopic operation (TEO, 65.4 %), TEM (26.9 %), and TAMIS platform (7.7 %). The most common surgical indication included endoscopically unresectable adenomas (50 %). The average distance of lesions from the anal verge (AV) was 9.6 cm (range 4–20 cm). Peritoneal entry occurred in 22 cases (28.2 %). Platform used (TAMIS vs. rigid, p < 0.05), mean distance from the AV (p < 0.0001), location along the rectum (p = 0.01), and mean specimen size (p = 0.01) were associated with a higher likelihood of peritoneal entry. All rectal defects associated with peritoneal entry were successfully closed transanally except for two (TEM and TEO) cases that required conversion to laparoscopic low anterior resection and laparoscopic Hartmann’s, respectively. There were four TAMIS cases that required conversion to TEO platforms.

Conclusion

In this high-risk TEM, TEO, and TAMIS series (one-third of rectal lesions located in the upper rectum), 91 % of all peritoneal entries were managed transanally without increased morbidity. TAMIS for upper rectal lesions was associated with a high risk of complicated peritoneal entry requiring conversion to a rigid platform.

Keywords

Transanal endoscopic resection Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) Rectal cancer Adenomas Peritoneal entry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We have no acknowledgments to report for this study.

Funding

No funding was received in support of this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Drs. Molina, Bordeianou, Shellito, and Sylla have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Baatrup G, Breum B, Qvist N, Wille-Jorgensen P, Elbrond H, Moller P, Hesselfeldt P (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in 143 consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma: results from a Danish multicenter study. Colorectal Dis 11:270–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Caldart M, Festa F, Morino M (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms: experience of 300 consecutive cases. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1831–1836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heintz A, Morschel M, Junginger T (1998) Comparison of results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical resection for T1 carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc 12:1145–1148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Palma P, Horisberger K, Joos A, Rothenhoefer S, Willeke F, Post S (2009) Local excision of early rectal cancer: Is transanal endoscopic microsurgery an alternative to radical surgery? Rev Esp Enferm Dig 101:172–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Winde G, Nottberg H, Keller R, Schmid KW, Bunte H (1996) Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 39:969–976CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Graaf EJ, Burger JW, van Ijsseldijk AL, Tetteroo GW, Dawson I, Hop WC (2011) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis 13:762–767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR, O’Connell PR, Winter DC (2015) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:254–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1026–1030 discussion 1030-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsai BM, Finne CO, Nordenstam JF, Christoforidis D, Madoff RD, Mellgren A (2010) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery resection of rectal tumors: outcomes and recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum 53:16–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, Atallah S (2014) A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013. Tech Coloproctol 18:775–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cocilovo C, Smith LE, Stahl T, Douglas J (2003) Transanal endoscopic excision of rectal adenomas. Surg Endosc 17:1461–1463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lev-Chelouche D, Margel D, Goldman G, Rabau MJ (2000) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: experience with 75 rectal neoplasms. Dis Colon Rectum 43:662–667 discussion 667-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Demartines N, von Flue MO, Harder FH (2001) Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumors: indications and results. World J Surg 25:870–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bignell MB, Ramwell A, Evans JR, Dastur N, Simson JN (2010) Complications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS): a prospective audit. Colorectal Dis 12:e99–e103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gavagan JA, Whiteford MH, Swanstrom LL (2004) Full-thickness intraperitoneal excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase short-term complications. Am J Surg 187:630–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marks JH, Frenkel JL, Greenleaf CE, D’Andrea AP (2014) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery with entrance into the peritoneal cavity: Is it safe? Dis Colon Rectum 57:1176–1182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramwell A, Evans J, Bignell M, Mathias J, Simson J (2009) The creation of a peritoneal defect in transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase complications. Colorectal Dis 11:964–966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baatrup G, Borschitz T, Cunningham C, Qvist N (2009) Perforation into the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer is not associated with major complications or oncological compromise. Surg Endosc 23:2680–2683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morino M, Allaix ME, Famiglietti F, Caldart M, Arezzo A (2013) Does peritoneal perforation affect short- and long-term outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery? Surg Endosc 27:181–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network NCCN Guidelines: Rectal Cancer. April 8, 2015Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumar AS, Sidani SM, Kolli K, Stahl TJ, Ayscue JM, Fitzgerald JF, Smith LE (2012) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal carcinoids: the largest reported United States experience. Colorectal Dis 14:562–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, Izfar S, Larach SW (2013) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 56:301–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hahnloser D, Cantero R, Salgado G, Dindo D, Rega D, Delrio P (2014) Transanal minimal invasive surgery (TAMIS) for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed? Colorectal Dis. doi: 10.1111/codi.12866
  24. 24.
    McLemore EC, Weston LA, Coker AM, Jacobsen GR, Talamini MA, Horgan S, Ramamoorthy SL (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benign and malignant rectal neoplasia. Am J Surg 208:372–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barendse RM, Doornebosch PG, Bemelman WA, Fockens P, Dekker E, de Graaf EJ (2012) Transanal employment of single access ports is feasible for rectal surgery. Ann Surg 256:1030–1033CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hompes R, Ris F, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ, Cahill RA (2012) Transanal glove port is a safe and cost-effective alternative for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg 99:1429–1435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    van den Boezem PB, Kruyt PM, Stommel MW, Tobon Morales R, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2011) Transanal single-port surgery for the resection of large polyps. Dig Surg 28:412–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gorgun IE, Aytac E, Costedio MM, Erem HH, Valente MA, Stocchi L (2014) Transanal endoscopic surgery using a single access port: a practical tool in the surgeon’s toybox. Surg Endosc 28:1034–1038CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lim SB, Seo SI, Lee JL, Kwak JY, Jang TY, Kim CW, Yoon YS, Yu CS, Kim JC (2012) Feasibility of transanal minimally invasive surgery for mid-rectal lesions. Surg Endosc 26:3127–3132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ragupathi M, Vande Maele D, Nieto J, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2012) Transanal endoscopic video-assisted (TEVA) excision. Surg Endosc 26:3528–3535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bridoux V, Schwarz L, Suaud L, Dazza M, Michot F, Tuech JJ (2014) Transanal minimal invasive surgery with the Endorec(TM) trocar: a low cost but effective technique. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:177–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee TG, Lee SJ (2014) Transanal single-port microsurgery for rectal tumors: minimal invasive surgery under spinal anesthesia. Surg Endosc 28:271–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, Tetteroo GW, Geldof H, Hop WC (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is feasible for adenomas throughout the entire rectum: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1107–1113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Barendse RM, Dijkgraaf MG, Rolf UR, Bijnen AB, Consten EC, Hoff C, Dekker E, Fockens P, Bemelman WA, de Graaf EJ (2013) Colorectal surgeons’ learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 27:3591–3602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kumar AS, Coralic J, Kelleher DC, Sidani S, Kolli K, Smith LE (2013) Complications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery are rare and minor: a single institution’s analysis and comparison to existing data. Dis Colon Rectum 56:295–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eyvazzadeh DJ, Lee JT, Madoff RD, Mellgren AF, Finne CO (2014) Outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery with intraperitoneal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 57:438–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Molina
    • 1
  • Liliana Bordeianou
    • 1
  • Paul Shellito
    • 1
  • Patricia Sylla
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryMount Sinai HospitalNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations