Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Commentary on “Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A et al. NOTES cholecystectomy: matched-pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1822–1826”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A et al (2011) NOTES cholecystectomy: matched-pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc 25:1822–1826

Download references

Disclosures

Anders Mark Christensen has no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Correspondence to Anders Mark Christensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, A.M. Commentary on “Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A et al. NOTES cholecystectomy: matched-pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1822–1826”. Surg Endosc 27, 3497–3498 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2892-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Operating Time
  • Complication Rate
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Patient Safety
  • Contingency Table