What Are We Really Measuring? A Content Comparison of Swallowing Outcome Measures for Head and Neck Cancer Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
A combination of outcome measures are required to provide important information on the physiological profile and associated impact of dysphagia in head and neck cancer (HNC). Choosing the most appropriate tool can be a difficult and time-consuming process. The aim of this study was to identify and then compare the content of tools commonly used to assess swallowing post HNC care using the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. A literature audit of 11 databases was conducted for relevant articles published between January 2004 and June 2017 and total of 502 papers met the inclusionary criteria. These papers were audited and 27 tools were identified which met the study criteria. The meaningful concepts contained in each tool were mapped to the ICF. Within the 27 tools, 898 meaningful concepts were identified and matched to 60 ICF categories. The most frequently matched ICF categories related to body functions, while comparatively few concepts matched to activity and participation and environmental factors. This study has identified that a large number of tools are currently being used in HNC research to measure swallowing outcomes. The sheer number of tools available to explore dysphagia post HNC highlights the lack of a uniform approach to outcome measurement which limits the potential to compare and combine research studies in order to strengthen treatment evidence. There is a need to develop an international consensus for a core outcome set of swallowing related measures, that capture the holistic impact of dysphagia, for HNC.
KeywordsDeglutition Deglutition disorders Head and neck cancer ICF Outcome measures
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Cancer Council Australia. Optimal care pathway for people with head and neck cancers. https://www.cancer.orgu.au/ocp. Accessed 9 Dec 2018.
- 6.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2018) Cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract: assessment and management in people aged 16 and over. NICE GUIDELINE 36. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng36. Accessed 9 Dec 2018.
- 11.Barnhart M, Robinson R, Simms V, Ward EC, Cartmill B, Chandler S, Smee R. Treatment toxicities and their impact on oral intake following non-surgical management for head and neck cancer: a 3 year longitudinal study. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26:2341–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4076-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
- 18.Nund RL, Ward EC, Scarinci NA, Cartmill B, Kuipers P, Porceddu SV. Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to people with dysphagia following non-surgical head and neck cancer management. Dysphagia. 2014;29:692–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9563-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Tschiesner UM, Rogers SN, Harreus U, Berghaus A, Cieza A. Content comparison of quality of life questionnaires used in head and neck cancer based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265:627–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0641-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Brockow T, Cieza A, Kuhlow H, Sigl T, Franke T, Harder M, Stucki G. Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on musculoskeletal disorders and chronic widespread pain using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med. 2004;44:30–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501960410015371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Granberg S, Moller K, Skagerstrand A, Moller C, Danermark B. The ICF Core Sets for hearing loss: researcher perspective, part II: linking outcome measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Int J Audiol. 2014;53:77–87. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.858279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Perry A, Skeat J. Australian therapy outcome measures (AusTOMs) for speech pathology. Victoria: La Trobe University; 2004.Google Scholar
- 36.Ho KF, Farnell DJ, Routledge JA, Burns MP, Sykes AJ, Slevin NJ, Davidson SE. Comparison of patient-reported late treatment toxicity (LENT-SOMA) with quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) assessment after head and neck radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2010;97:270–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the M. D. Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:870–6.Google Scholar
- 45.Dwivedi RC, et al. Validation of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) in a cohort of head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2010;46:e10–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Patterson JM, Hildreth A, McColl E, Carding PN, Hamilton D, Wilson JA. The clinical application of the 100 mL water swallow test in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:180–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.11.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Bressan V, Bagnasco A, Aleo G, Catania G, Zanini MP, Timmins F, Sasso L. The life experience of nutrition impact symptoms during treatment for head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25:1699–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3618-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar