Advertisement

Dysphagia

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Validation and Reliability of the French Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire

  • Nicolas AudagEmail author
  • Christophe Goubau
  • Etienne Danse
  • Laure Vandervelde
  • Giuseppe Liistro
  • Michel Toussaint
  • Gregory Reychler
Original Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is frequently under-reported and early detection may lead to adapt strategies of rehabilitation and management decisions. The Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ), a self-reported questionnaire for the detection and quantification of oropharyngeal dysphagia, was previously adapted and validated in other languages but not in French. The purposes of this study were to develop and validate a French version of SSQ (SSQ-f) and to assess its psychometric properties. This SSQ-f, obtained by back-translation and cross-cultural adaptation, was validated in 27 patients with impaired swallowing and 27 healthy controls. After inclusion, patients filled in the SSQ-f and performed a videofluoroscopic swallow study. The penetration aspiration scale (PAS) and Dysphagia outcome and severity scale (DOSS) were assigned to assess construct validity. Sensitivity and specificity of cut-off scores for the SSQ-f were assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Moreover, the SSQ-f was repeated after 2 weeks to evaluate its test–retest reliability. The results supported that SSQ-f was considered understandable. Its total score was strongly correlated to the DOSS (r = − 0.873) and to the PAS (r = 0.738). It demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.744 to 0.956. The test–retest reliability was excellent. According to the ROC curve, cut-off scores of 118.5 or 218.5 were proposed for determining oropharyngeal dysphagia using DOSS as a reference and 755.0, using PAS as reference. No ceiling or floor effects were observed. In conclusion, the SSQ-f is a valid and reliable instrument to measure and detect oropharyngeal dysphagia in French-speaking subjects and can be used in a clinical setting.

Keywords

Swallowing deglutition disorders Sydney Swallow Questionnaire Validation Assessment French translation 

Notes

Funding

NA received a Grant from Fund Eliane Lagast and Association Belge contre les Maladies neuro-Musculaires for his PhD Scholarship. CG is supported by the Fondation Saint-Luc. GR received a Grant from Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were approved by the Institutional Medical Ethics Committee (B403201628760) and registered in Clinical Trials (NCT02845362). Participants were recruited on a voluntary basis and without financial compensation. They signed a written informed consent form in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.and the current guidelines for Clinical Good Practice.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ekberg O. Dysphagia diagnosis and treatment. Medical radiology. Berlin: Springer; 2012.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rommel N, Hamdy S. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(1):49–59.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Turley R, Cohen S. Impact of voice and swallowing problems in the elderly. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(1):33–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cabre M, Serra-Prat M, Palomera E, Almirall J, Pallares R, Clave P. Prevalence and prognostic implications of dysphagia in elderly patients with pneumonia. Age Ageing. 2010;39(1):39–45.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afp100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, Pauloski BR, Ohmae Y, Kahrilas PJ. Normal swallowing physiology as viewed by videofluoroscopy and videoendoscopy. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1998;50(6):311–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khaldoun E, Woisard V, Verin E. Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009;33(3):167–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gcb.2008.12.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Logemann JA, Veis S, Colangelo L. A screening procedure for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 1999;14(1):44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00009583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lindgren S, Janzon L. Prevalence of swallowing complaints and clinical findings among 50-79-year-old men and women in an urban population. Dysphagia. 1991;6(4):187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Willig TN, Paulus J, Lacau Saint Guily J, Beon C, Navarro J. Swallowing problems in neuromuscular disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(11):1175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Toussaint M, Davidson Z, Bouvoie V, Evenepoel N, Haan J, Soudon P. Dysphagia in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: practical recommendations to guide management. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;5:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1111434.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hill M, Hughes T, Milford C. Treatment for swallowing difficulties (dysphagia) in chronic muscle disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2:CD004303.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004303.pub2.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wallace KL, Middleton S, Cook IJ. Development and validation of a self-report symptom inventory to assess the severity of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterology. 2000;118(4):678–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Etges CL, Scheeren B, Gomes E, Barbosa Lde R. Screening tools for dysphagia: a systematic review. Codas. 2014;26(5):343–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Speyer R. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: screening and assessment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013;46(6):989–1008.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2013.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kertscher B, Speyer R, Palmieri M, Plant C. Bedside screening to detect oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: an updated systematic review. Dysphagia. 2014;29(2):204–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9490-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Audag N, Goubau C, Toussaint M, Reychler G. Screening and evaluation tools of dysphagia in children with neuromuscular diseases: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(6):591–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bai F, Ling J, Esoimeme G, Yao L, Wang M, Huang J, Shi A, Cao Z, Chen Y, Tian J, Wang X, Yang K. A systematic review of questionnaires about patient’s values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines. Patient Preference Adherence. 2018;12:2309–23.  https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.S177540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Espitalier F, Fanous A, Aviv J, Bassiouny S, Desuter G, Nerurkar N, Postma G, Crevier-Buchman L. International consensus (ICON) on assessment of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2018;135(1s):S17–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2017.12.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamamoto T, Ikeda K, Usui H, Miyamoto M, Murata M. Validation of the Japanese translation of the Swallowing Disturbance Questionnaire in Parkinson’s disease patients. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(7):1299–303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0041-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Monzani A, Ceriani E, Atac M, Jukic-Peladic N, Venturini C, Orlandoni P. Reliability and validity of the Italian Eating Assessment Tool. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;122(11):717–24.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941312201109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sales DS, Alvarenga RM, Vasconcelos CC, Silva RG, Thuler LC. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Springerplus. 2013;2:332.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oda C, Yamamoto T, Fukumoto Y, Nakayama K, Sato M, Murata M, Kobayashi Y. Validation of the Japanese translation of the Dysphagia Handicap Index. Patient Preference Adherence. 2017;11:193–8.  https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s126052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moller R, Safa S, Ostberg P. Validation of the Swedish translation of eating assessment tool (S-EAT-10). Acta Otolaryngol. 2016;136(7):749–53.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2016.1146411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Magalhaes Junior HV, Pernambuco Lde A, Souza LB, Ferreira MA, Lima KC. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Northwestern Dysphagia Patient Check Sheet to Brazilian Portuguese. Codas. 2013;25(4):369–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin LC, Chen MY, Chen YC, Portwood MJ. Psychometrics of a Chinese translation of the swallowing questionnaire. J Adv Nurs. 2001;34(3):296–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kwon CH, Kim YH, Park JH, Oh BM, Han TR. Validity and reliability of the korean version of the MD anderson Dysphagia inventory for head and neck cancer patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013;37(4):479–87.  https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.4.479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hajdu SF, Plaschke CC, Johansen C, Dalton SO, Wessel I. Cross-cultural translation, adaptation and reliability of the Danish M. D. Andeson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) in patients with head and neck cancer. Dysphagia. 2017;32(4):472–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9785-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goncalves MI, Remaili CB, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the Eating Assessment Tool—EAT-10. Codas. 2013;25(6):601–4.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s2317-17822013.05000012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ginocchio D, Alfonsi E, Mozzanica F, Accornero AR, Bergonzoni A, Chiarello G, De Luca N, Farneti D, Marilia S, Calcagno P, Turroni V, Schindler A. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2016;31(5):626–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9720-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Farahat M, Malki KH, Mesallam TA, Bukhari M, Alharethy S. Development of the Arabic Version of Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI). Dysphagia. 2014;29(4):459–67.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9528-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carlsson S, Ryden A, Rudberg I, Bove M, Bergquist H, Finizia C. Validation of the Swedish M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) in patients with head and neck cancer and neurologic swallowing disturbances. Dysphagia. 2012;27(3):361–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9375-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Burgos R, Sarto B, Segurola H, Romagosa A, Puiggros C, Vazquez C, Cardenas G, Barcons N, Araujo K, Perez-Portabella C. Translation and validation of the Spanish version of the EAT-10 (Eating Assessment Tool-10) for the screening of dysphagia. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27(6):2048–54.  https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2012.27.6.6100.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bauer F, Seiss M, Grassel E, Stelzle F, Klotz M, Rosanowski F. Swallowing-related quality of life in oral cavity cancer. The German version of the Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Hno. 2010;58(7):692–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-010-2117-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Barzegar-Bafrooei E, Bakhtiary J, Khatoonabadi AR, Fatehi F, Maroufizadeh S, Fathali M. Validation of the Persian version of the dysphagia handicap index in patients with neurological disorders. Iran J Neurol. 2016;15(3):128–32.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Woisard V, Bodin S, Puech M. The Voice Handicap Index: impact of the translation in French on the validation. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2004;125(5):307–12.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Speyer R, Cordier R, Kertscher B, Heijnen BJ. Psychometric properties of questionnaires on functional health status in oropharyngeal dysphagia: a systematic literature review. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:458678.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/458678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dwivedi RC, St Rose S, Chisholm EJ, Georgalas C, Bisase B, Amen F, Kerawala CJ, Clarke PM, Nutting CM, Rhys-Evans PH, Harrington KJ, Kazi R. Evaluation of swallowing by Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with primary surgery. Dysphagia. 2012;27(4):491–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-012-9395-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shaker R, Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Easterling C, SpringerLink (Online service) (2013) Principles of Deglutition A Multidisciplinary Text for Swallowing and its Disorders.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Holland G, Jayasekeran V, Pendleton N, Horan M, Jones M, Hamdy S. Prevalence and symptom profiling of oropharyngeal dysphagia in a community dwelling of an elderly population: a self-reporting questionnaire survey. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24(7):476–80.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01182.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nimmons D, Michou E, Jones M, Pendleton N, Horan M, Hamdy S. A longitudinal study of symptoms of oropharyngeal Dysphagia in an elderly community-dwelling population. Dysphagia. 2016;31(4):560–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9715-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Archer SK, Garrod R, Hart N, Miller S. Dysphagia in Duchenne muscular dystrophy assessed by validated questionnaire. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013;48(2):240–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00197.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Szczesniak MM, Maclean J, Zhang T, Liu R, Cook IJ. The normative range for and age and gender effects on the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ). Dysphagia. 2014;29(5):535–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9541-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Quon H, Hui X, Cheng Z, Robertson S, Peng L, Bowers M, Moore J, Choflet A, Thompson A, Muse M, Kiess A, Page B, Fakhry C, Gourin C, O’Hare J, Graham P, Szczesniak M, Maclean J, Cook I, McNutt T. Quantitative evaluation of head and neck cancer treatment-related Dysphagia in the development of a personalized treatment deintensification paradigm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99(5):1271–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Arenaz Bua B, Bulow M. Validation in Swedish of Sydney swallow questionnaire. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:742.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Logemann JA. Screening, diagnosis, and management of neurogenic dysphagia. Semin Neurol. 1996;16(4):319–27.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1040990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11(2):93–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Robbins J, Coyle J, Rosenbek J, Roecker E, Wood J. Differentiation of normal and abnormal airway protection during swallowing using the penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1999;14(4):228–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00009610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    O’Neil KH, Purdy M, Falk J, Gallo L. The Dysphagia outcome and severity scale. Dysphagia. 1999;14(3):139–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00009595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    McGraw K, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:30.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hajian-Tilaki K. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med. 2013;4(2):627–35.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Manjaly JG, Vaughan-Shaw PG, Dale OT, Tyler S, Corlett JC, Frost RA. Cricopharyngeal dilatation for the long-term treatment of dysphagia in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy. Dysphagia. 2012;27(2):216–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9356-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mossey-Gaston CHP, Oscroft N. The Relationship between patient perception and swallow function in patients with ataxia-telangiectasia—a pilot study. J Oral Health Dent Proc UKSRG-2016. 2017;1:A0017.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schwartz B, Martin SW. 1—Principles of Epidemiology and Public Health A2—Long, Sarah S. In: Principles and practice of pediatric infectious diseases. 4 h ed. Content Repository Only!, London, pp 1–9. (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4377-2702-9.00003-9.
  59. 59.
    Bel S. Temps de préparation et durée des repas. In: WIV-ISP (ed) Enquête de consommation alimentaire 2014–2015. Rapport 1. WIV-ISP, Bruxelles; (2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC)Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université Catholique de LouvainBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Service de Médecine physique et réadaptationCliniques universitaires Saint-LucBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Unité de Pneumologie pédiatriqueCliniques universitaires Saint-LucBrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.Service de PneumologieCliniques universitaires Saint-LucBrusselsBelgium
  5. 5.Service de RadiologieCliniques Universitaires Saint-LucBrusselsBelgium
  6. 6.Haute Ecole Léonard de Vinci, PARNASSE-ISEIBrusselsBelgium
  7. 7.Inkendaal Rehabilitation HospitalVlezenbeekBelgium
  8. 8.Cliniques universitaires Saint-LucBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations