Discrete & Computational Geometry

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 482–504 | Cite as

Upper and Lower Bounds for Online Routing on Delaunay Triangulations

  • Nicolas Bonichon
  • Prosenjit Bose
  • Jean-Lou De Carufel
  • Ljubomir PerkovićEmail author
  • André van Renssen


Consider a weighted graph G whose vertices are points in the plane and edges are line segments between pairs of points. The weight of each edge is the Euclidean distance between its two endpoints. A routing algorithm on G has a competitive ratio of c if the length of the path produced by the algorithm from any vertex s to any vertex t is at most c times the length of the shortest path from s to t in G. If the length of the path is at most c|[st]| (where |[st]| is the length of the line segment [st]), we say that the routing algorithm has a routing ratio of c. The routing algorithm is online if it makes forwarding decisions based on (1) the k-neighborhood in G (for some integer constant \(k>0\)) of the current position of the message and (2) limited information stored in the message header. We present an online routing algorithm on the Delaunay triangulation with routing ratio less than 5.90. This improves upon the algorithm with best known routing ratio of 15.48. The algorithm is an adaptation, to the Delaunay triangulation, of the classic routing algorithm by Chew on the \(L_1\)-Delaunay triangulation. It makes forwarding decisions based on the 1-neighborhood of the current position of the message and the positions of the message source and destination only. This last requirement is an improvement over the best known online routing algorithms on the Delaunay triangulation which require the header of a message to also contain partial sums of distances along the routing path. We show that the routing ratio of Chew’s algorithm on the Delaunay triangulation can be greater than 5.72 so the 5.90 upper bound is close to the best possible. We also show that the routing (resp., competitive) ratio of any deterministic k-local algorithm is at least 1.70 (resp., 1.33) for the Delaunay triangulation and 2.70 (resp. 1.12) for the \(L_1\)-Delaunay triangulation. In the case of the \(L_1\)-Delaunay triangulation, this implies that even though there always exists a path between s and t whose length is at most 2.61|[st]|, it is not always possible to route a message along a path of length less than 2.70|[st]|.


Delaunay triangulation Online routing Routing ratio Competitive ratio 

Mathematics Subject Classification

68U05 65D18 



We thank the reviewers for their thorough reviews and comments, which improved the quality and clarity of the paper. N. Bonichon was partially supported by ANR Grant JCJC EGOS ANR-12-JS02-002-01 and LIRCO. P. Bose was partially supported by NSERC.


  1. 1.
    Bonichon, N., Gavoille, C., Hanusse, N., Perkovic, L.: Tight stretch factors for L\(_{1}\)- and L\(_{\infty }\)-Delaunay triangulations. Comput. Geom. 48(3), 237–250 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bose, P., Morin, P.: Online routing in triangulations. SIAM J. Comput. 33(4), 937–951 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bose, P., Smid, M.: On plane geometric spanners: a survey and open problems. Comput. Geom. 46(7), 818–830 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bose, P., Devroye, L., Löffler, M., Snoeyink, J., Verma, V.: Almost all Delaunay triangulations have stretch factor greater than \(\pi \)/2. Comput. Geom. 44(2), 121–127 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bose, P., De Carufel, J.-L., Durocher, S., Taslakian, P.: Competitive online routing on Delaunay triangulations. In: 14th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT). (To appear in the Int. J. Comput. Geom. Appl.) (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bose, P., Fagerberg, R., van Renssen, A., Verdonschot, S.: Optimal local routing on Delaunay triangulations defined by empty equilateral triangles. SIAM J. Comput. 44(6), 1626–1649 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braunl, T.: Embedded Robotics: Mobile Robot Design and Applications with Embedded Systems. Springer, Berlin (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Broutin, N., Devillers, O., Hemsley, R.: Efficiently navigating a random Delaunay triangulation. In: AofA 2014—25th International Conference on Probabilistic, Combinatorial and Asymptotic Methods for the Analysis of Algorithms, pp. 49–60 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chew, L.P.: There is a planar graph almost as good as the complete graph. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG), pp. 169–177 (1986)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chew, L.P.: There are planar graphs almost as good as the complete graph. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 39(2), 205–219 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dijkstra, E.W.: A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer. Math. 1, 269–271 (1959)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dobkin, D.P., Friedman, S.J., Supowit, K.J.: Delaunay graphs are almost as good as complete graphs. Discrete Comput. Geom. 5(4), 399–407 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Legat, K., Wieser, M.: Navigation: Principles of Positioning and Guidance. Springer, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murgante, B., Borruso, G., Lapucci, A.: Geocomputation and Urban Planning. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Narasimhan, G., Smid, M.H.M.: Geometric Spanner Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stojmenovic, I.: Handbook of Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing. Wiley, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Worboys, M.F., Duckham, M.: GIS: A Computing Perspective, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xia, G.: The stretch factor of the Delaunay triangulation is less than 1.998. SIAM J. Comput. 42(4), 1620–1659 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xia, G., Zhang, L.: Toward the tight bound of the stretch factor of Delaunay triangulations. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry (CCCG) (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Bordeaux, LaBRI, UMR 5800TalenceFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, LaBRI, UMR 5800TalenceFrance
  3. 3.School of Computer ScienceCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  4. 4.School of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  5. 5.School of ComputingDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA
  6. 6.National Institute of InformaticsTokyoJapan
  7. 7.JST, ERATO, Kawarabayashi Large Graph ProjectTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations