Advertisement

Biosynthesis and accumulation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)-polyethylene glycol, a hybrid co-polymer by endophytic Bacillus cereus RCL 02

  • Rituparna Das
  • Arundhati Pal
  • A. K. PaulEmail author
Research Paper
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Co-polymerization of microbial polyesters, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), with synthetic polymers has become an established and promising tool in the recent past for improving the material and biological properties of the biopolyesters. Bacillus cereus RCL 02, a leaf endophytic bacterium of the oleaginous plant Ricinus communis L., has been reported to produce a significant amount of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) [P(3HB)] and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) [P(3HB-co-3HV)] under batch cultivation. The present study demonstrates the synthesis and accumulation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)-polyethylene glycol [P(3HB-co-3HV)–PEG] co-polymer by the isolate RCL 02 in glucose, valeric acid, and PEG-200 supplemented mineral salts medium following dual-step cultivation. The identity of P(3HB-co-3HV)–PEG co-polymer so produced has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR), and proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopic studies, and the purified co-polymer was found to be composed of 3.2 mol% ethylene glycol (EG) and 8.4 mol% 3HV along with 3HB. While the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed that P(3HB-co-3HV)–PEG films degraded at 269.32 °C, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) recorded the melting peak of the co-polymer at 163.8 °C. This study emphasized to explore the endophytic Bacillus spp. for production of P(3HB-co-3HV)–PEG co-polymers with improved material properties which may find possible application for biomedical purposes.

Keywords

Polyhydroxyalkanoates Polyethylene glycol Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)- polyethylene glycol co-polymer Bacillus cereus Endophytic bacteria Oleaginous plant 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research support to Rituparna Das from the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India (Grant No. DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/REL5/2013/C1) is duly acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Anjum A, Zuber M, Zia KM, Noreen A, Anjum MN, Tabasum S (2016) Microbial production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) and its copolymers: a review of recent advancements. Int J Biol Macrmol 89:161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Winnacker M, Rieger B (2017) Copolymers of polyhydroxyalkanoates and polyethylene glycols: recent advancements with biological and medical significance. Polym Int 66:497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foster J (2010) PEGylation and bioPEGylation of polyhydroxyalkanoates: synthesis, characterisation and applications. In: Elnashar M (ed) Biopolymers. InTech, Vienna, pp 243–256 (Chapter 12) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xiang HX, Wang SC, Wang RL, Zhou Z, Peng C, Zhu MF (2013) Synthesis and characterization of an environmentally friendly PHBV/PEG copolymer network as a phase change material. Sci China Chem 56:716–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonartsev AP, Yakovlev SG, Zharkova II, Boskhomdzhiev AP, Bagrov DV, Myshkina VL, Makhina TK, Kharitonova EP, Samsonova OV, Feofanov AV, Voinova VV, Zernov AL, Efremov YM, Bonartseva GA, Shaitan KV, Kirpichnikov MP (2013) Cell attachment on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-poly(ethylene glycol) copolymer produced by Azotobacter chroococcum 7B. BMC Biochem 14:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shi F, Gross RA, Rutherford DR (1996) Microbial polyester synthesis: effects of poly(ethylene glycol) on product composition, repeat unit sequence, and end group structure. Macromol 29:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ashby RD, Shi F, Gross RA (1999) A tunable switch to regulate the synthesis of low and high molecular weight microbial polyesters. Biotechnol Bioeng 62:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foster LJR, Sanguanchaipaiwong V, Gabelish CL, Hook J, Stenzel M (2005) A natural-synthetic hybrid of polyhydroxyoctanoate-diethylene glycol: biosynthesis and properties. Polym 46:6587–6594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ashby RD, Shi F, Gross RA (1997) Use of poly(ethylene glycol) to control the end group structure and molecular weight of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) formed by Alcaligenes latus DSM 1122. Tetrahedron 53:15209–15223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shi F, Ashby R, Gross RA (1996) Use of poly(ethylene glycol)s to regulate poly(3-hydroxyybutyrate) molecular weight during Alcaligenes eutrophus cultivations. Macromolecules 29:7753–7758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonartsev AP, Yakovlev SG, Boskhomdzhiev AP, Zharkova II, Bagrov DV, Myshkina VL, Mahina TK, Charitonova EP, Samsonova OV, Zernov AL, Zhuikov VA, Efremov YM, Voinova VV, Bonartseva GA, Shaitan KV (2013) The terpolymer produced by Azotobacter chroococcum 7B: effect of surface properties on cell attachment. PLoS ONE 8:e57200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saha SP, Patra A, Paul AK (2006) Incorporation of polyethylene glycol in polyhydroxyalkanoic acids accumulated by Azotobacter chroococcum MAL-201. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33:377–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zanzig J, Carmen S (2003) Effects of poly(ethylene glycol) on the production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) by Azotobacter vineladii UWD. J Polym Environ 11:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ashby RD, Solaiman DKY, Foglia TA (2002) Poly(ethylene-gycol)-mediated molar mass control of short-chain- and medium-chain-length poly(hydroxyalkanoates) from Pseudomonas oleovorans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 60:154–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Valappil SP, Boccaccini AR, Bucke C, Roy I (2007) Polyhydroxyalkanoates in Gram-positive bacteria: insights from genera Bacillus. and Streptomyces. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 91:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumar P, Patel SK, Lee JK, Kalia VC (2013) Extending the limits of Bacillus for novel biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Adv 31:1543–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Das R, Pal A, Paul AK (2017) Production of biopolyester poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) by Bacillus cereus RCL 02, a leaf endophyte of Ricinus communis L. J Microbiol Biotechnol Res 7:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Das R, Saha NR, Pal A, Chattopadhyay D, Paul AK (2018) Comparative evaluation of physico-chemical characteristics of biopolyesters P(3HB) and P(3HB-co-3HV) produced by endophytic Bacillus cereus RCL 02. Front Biol 13(4):297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramsay BA, Lomaliza K, Chavarie C, Dube B, Bataille P, Ramsay JA (1990) Production of poly-(β-hydroxybutyric-co-β-valeric) acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:2093–2098Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Choi MH, Yoon SC, Lenz RW (1999) Production of poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-4-hydroxybutyric acid) and poly (4-hydroxybutyric acid) without subsequent degradation by Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1570–1577Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Law JH, Slepecky RA (1961) Assay of poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid. J Bacteriol 82:33–36Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bayari S, Severcan F (2005) FTIR study of biodegradable biopolymers: P(3HB), P(3HB-co-4HB) and P(3HB-co-3HV). J Mol Str 744:529–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hong K, Sun S, Tian W, Chen GQ, Huang W (1999) A rapid method for detecting bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates in intact cells by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:523–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Microbiology Laboratory, Department of BotanyUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Post Graduate Department of BotanySerampore CollegeSeramporeIndia

Personalised recommendations