Reclamation of wastewater organics via two-stage growth of bacteria-then-oleaginous phagotrophic algae
- 18 Downloads
A substantial amount of organic matter is wasted in current wastewater treatment processes. To reclaim the value of organic matter, a two-stage continuous-flow open process has been developed by utilizing the capability of phagotrophic algae in ingesting bacterial cells. In this process, wastewater is first pumped into a bacteria tank to grow bacterial cells, and then the effluent containing grown bacteria cells is fed to an algae tank to grow phagotrophic algae. The operation conditions such as dilution rate, pH, and dissolved oxygen level were comprehensively investigated and optimized with long-term tests. Results show that phagotrophic algae can be stably cultivated with wastewater organics through this open process without costly chemical/physical sterilization. The produced phagotrophic algae had high lipid content and can be potentially used as biofuel feedstock.
KeywordsPhagotrophic algae Wastewater treatment Biofuel feedstock Resource recovery
This research work was supported by the Ohio Water Development Authority (Grant number 5300). We thank Drs. Soroosh Soltani Dashtbozorg, Majid Hosseini and Qin Zhang of this laboratory for conducting preliminary experiments and improving operation procedures of the two-stage continuous process. We also thank Dr. Zhongye Lin for valuable discussion.
- 1.Wigginton N, Yeston J, Malakoff D (2012) More treasure than trash. American Association for the Advancement of Science, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 3.Zhang CM, Mao ZG, Wang X, Zhang JH, Sun FB, Tang L, Zhang HJ (2010) Effective ethanol production by reutilizing waste distillage anaerobic digestion effluent in an integrated fermentation process coupled with both ethanol and methane fermentations. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 33:1067–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Grady CL Jr, Daigger GT, Love NG, Filipe CD, Leslie Grady C (2011) Biological wastewater treatment. IWA Publishing, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- 8.Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL (2003) Wastewater engineering. Management 7:1–4Google Scholar
- 19.Pringsheim E (1952) On the nutrition of Ochromonas. Q J Microsc Sci 3:71–96Google Scholar
- 20.Shannon SP (2007) Comparison of the ingestion and digestion rates of Ochromonas danica grazing on Pseudomonas fluorescens of varying food quality. The University of Texas, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
- 22.Blanch HW, Clark DS (1997) Biochemical engineering. CRC, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 26.Lin Z (2013) Microalgal growth and lipid production from organic waste. The University of Akron, AkronGoogle Scholar
- 30.Staley Z (2013) Direct and indirect effects of agrochemicals on bacterial pathogens and fecal indicator bacteria. The University of South FloridaGoogle Scholar
- 31.Engel T, Drobny G, Reid PJ (2008) Physical chemistry for the life sciences. Pearson Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 34.Singh A, Pant D, Olsen SI, Nigam PS (2012) Key issues to consider in microalgae based biodiesel production. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part A Energy Sci Res 29:563–576Google Scholar