Use of bacterial biosurfactants as natural collectors in the dissolved air flotation process for the treatment of oily industrial effluent
- 128 Downloads
The aim of the present study was to investigate the separation of oil from water using a bench-scale DAF prototype with the addition of biosurfactants isolated from Pseudomonas cepacia CCT6659 and Bacillus cereus UCP1615. The best operating conditions for the DAF prototype were determined using a central composite rotatable design. The results demonstrated that the biosurfactants from P. cepacia and B. cereus increased the oil separation efficiency from 53.74% (using only microbubbles) to 94.11 and 80.01%, respectively. The prediction models for both DAF-biosurfactant systems were validated, showing an increase in the efficiency of the DAF process from 53.74% to 98.55 and 70.87% using the formulated biosurfactants from P. cepacia and B. cereus, respectively. The biosurfactant from P. cepacia was selected as the more promising product and used for the treatment of oily effluent from a thermoelectric plant, achieving removal rates ranging between 75.74 (isolated biosurfactant) and 95.70% (formulated biosurfactant), respectively.
KeywordsBiosurfactant Bacillus cereus Pseudomonas cepacia Dissolved air flotation Oily water CCRD
This study was funded by the Foundation for the Support of Science and Technology of the State of Pernambuco (FACEPE), the Research and Development Program from National Agency of Electrical Energy (ANEEL), the Thermoelectric Company of Candeias (Global Group) code PD-06961-0005/2016, the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Education Personnel (CAPES). The authors are grateful to the laboratories of the Centre for Sciences and Technology of the Catholic University of Pernambuco, Brazil.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
This work is free from any conflict of interest.
- 8.CONAMA (2007) Brazilian National Council for the Environment—Resolution 393/2007. 01–08Google Scholar
- 10.Albuquerque CF, Luna-Finkler CL, Rufino RD et al (2012) Evaluation of biosurfactants for removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous effluent using flotation techniques. Int Rev Chem Eng 4:156–161Google Scholar
- 11.Menezes CTB, Barros EC, Rufino RD et al (2011) Replacing synthetic with microbial surfactants as collectors in the treatment of aqueous effluent produced by acid mine drainage, using the dissolved air flotation technique. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 163:540–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-9060-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Soares da Silva R, de CF, Rufino, Luna RD JM, et al (2013) Enhancement of biosurfactant production from Pseudomonas cepacia CCT6659 through optimisation of nutritional parameters using response surface methodology. Tenside Surfactants Deterg 50:137–142. https://doi.org/10.3139/113.110241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Silva IA, Helena A, Resende M, Padilha NM (2018) Aplication of biosurfactants produced by Bacillus cereus and Candida sphaerica in the bioremediation of petroleum derivative in soil and Water. Chem Eng Trans 64:1–6Google Scholar
- 17.Rita de Cássia F, Almeida DG, Meira HM, et al (2017) Production and characterization of a new biosurfactant from Pseudomonas cepacia grown in low-cost fermentative medium and its application in the oil industry. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BCAB.2017.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar