Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The influence of floc size and hydraulic detention time on the performance of a dissolved air flotation (DAF) pilot unit in the light of a mathematical model

  • 274 Accesses

  • 4 Citations

Abstract

The influence of floc size and hydraulic detention time on the performance of a dissolved air flotation (DAF) pilot unit was investigated in the light of a known mathematical model. The following design and operational parameters were considered: the hydraulic detention time (tdcz) and hydraulic loading rate in the contact zone, the down-flow loading rate in the clarification zone, the particle size distribution (d F), and the recirculation rate (p). As a reference for DAF performance analysis, the proposed β.td parameter from the above mentioned mathematical model was employed. The results indicated that tdcz is an important factor in DAF performance and that d F and floc size are also determinants of DAF efficiency. Further, β.td was sensitive to both design and operational parameters, which were varied in the DAF pilot plant. The performance of the DAF unit decreases with increasing β.td values because a higher td (considering a fixed β) or a higher β (e.g., higher hydrophobicity of the flocs for a fixed td) would be necessary in the reaction zone to reach desired flotation efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Abbreviations

Ø :

Floc volume concentration in the inlet of the flotation unit

P :

Recirculation fraction (Q R /Q ab), where Q R is the recirculation flow and Q ab is the inlet flow (L3 T−1)

α :

Flux of particles

S v :

Expressed as the dissolved (precipitable) air volume concentration in the recirculated water flow (volume of dissolved air/volume of recirculated water)

n :

Number of required microbubbles to be attached to each floc to promote its removal after leaving the contact zone

V bf :

Rise velocity of aggregate (L T−1)

d B :

Air bubbles diameter, uniformly sized (L)

d F :

Floc diameter, uniformly sized (L)

η :

Kolmogorov microscale of turbulence

p :

Recirculation rate (−)

HLRd:

Hydraulic loading rate in the separation zone (L T−1)

Tdcz:

Hydraulic detention time in the contact zone (T−1)

ε :

Energy dissipation per mass unit (J kg−1 s−1)

\(\rho\) F and \(\rho\) l :

Specific mass for floc and liquid, respectively

ν :

Cinematic viscosity of the water (L2 T−1)

L and T :

Refer to general length and time units, respectively

References

  1. 1.

    Jaeyoung P, Jin Hwan O, Ellis TG (2012) Evaluation of an on-site pilot static granular bed reactor (SGBR) for the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:459–468

  2. 2.

    Reali MAP, Penetra RG, Carvalho MEC (2001) Flotation technique with coagulant and polymer application applied to the post-treatment of effluents from anaerobic reactor treating sewage. Wat Sci Technol 44(4):205–212

  3. 3.

    Pinto Filho ACT, Brandão CCS (2001) Evaluation of flocculation and dissolved air flotation as an advanced wastewater treatment. Wat Sci Technol 43(8):83–90

  4. 4.

    Jung H-J, Lee J-W, Choi D-Y, Kim S-J, Kwak D-H (2006) Flotation efficiency of activated sludge flocs using population balance model in dissolved air flotation. Korean J Chem Eng 23(2):271–278

  5. 5.

    Chung CM, Cho CM, Kim KW, Yamamoto YJ, Chung K (2012) TH Enhanced biological nitrogen removal in MLE combined with post-denitrification process and EF clarifier. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:503–511

  6. 6.

    Edzwald JK (1995) Principles and applications of dissolved air flotation. In: Ives KJ, Bernhardt HJ (eds.). Flotation processes in water and sludge treatment, 3–4 edn. vol 31, Wat Sci Tech, Great Britain, pp 1–23

  7. 7.

    Haarhoff J, Edzwald JK (2001) Modelling of floc-bubble aggregate rise rates in dissolved air flotation. Water Sci Technol 43(8):175–184

  8. 8.

    Flint LR, Howarth WJ (1971) The collision efficiency of small particles with spherical air bubbles. Chem Eng Sci 26:1155–1168

  9. 9.

    Reay D, Ratcliff GA (1973) Removal of fine particles from water by dispersed air flotation: effects of bubble size and particle size on collection efficiency. Can J Chem Eng 51:178–185

  10. 10.

    Cornet JC, Moisse R (1982) Contribution à lètablissement dún modèle mathèmatique décrivant le fonctionnement dún flottateur en traitement des eaux. (Contribution to The establishment of a mathematical model describing the operation of a flotation unit for water treatment). La Technique de Léau et de Lássainissement 428–429. pp 23–30

  11. 11.

    Malley JP, Edzwald JK (1991) Concepts for dissolved-air flotation treatment of drinking waters. J Water Supply Res & Technol—AQUA 40(1):7–17

  12. 12.

    Matsui Y, Fukushi K, Tambo N (1998) Modeling, simulation and operational parameters of dissolved air flotation. J Water Supply Res & Technol—AQUA 47(1):9–20

  13. 13.

    Reali MAP (1991) Concepção e avaliação de um sistema compacto para tratamento de águas de abastecimento utilizando o processo de flotação por ar dissolvido e filtração com taxa declinante (Conception and evaluation of a compact water treatment system containing an original declined rate floto-filtration unit). PhD Thesis, São Carlos Engineering School, University of São Paulo

  14. 14.

    Fukushi K, Tambo N, Matsui Y (1995) A kinetic model for dissolved air flotation in water and wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 31(3–4):37–47

  15. 15.

    Liers S, Baeyens J, Mochtar J (1996) Modeling dissolved air flotation. Water Environ Res 68(6):1061–1075

  16. 16.

    Leppinen DM (2000) A kinetic model on dissolved air flotation including the effects of interparticle forces. J Water Supply Res & Technol—AQUA 49:258–268

  17. 17.

    Leppinen DM, Dalziel SB, Linden PF (2001) Modelling the global efficiency of dissolved air flotation. Water Sci Technol 43(8):159–166

  18. 18.

    Han M, Kim W, Dockko S (2001) Collision efficiency factor of bubble and particle (β bp) in DAF: theory and experimental verification. Wat Sci Technol 43(8):139–144

  19. 19.

    Kwak DH, Jung HJ, Lee JW, Kwon SB, Kim SJ, Yoo SJ, Won CH (2007) Rise velocity verification of bubble-floc agglomerates using population balance in DAF process. J Water Supply Res & Technol—AQUA 58(2):85–94

  20. 20.

    Reali MAP, Campos JR (2002) Researches on flotation and development of new high performance DAF units for water treatment in Brazil. Res Adv Water Res 3:23–40

  21. 21.

    Moruzzi RB, Reali MAP (2010) Characterization of micro-bubble size distribution and flow configuration in DAF contact zone by a non-intrusive image analysis system and tracer tests. Water Sci Technol 61(1):253–262

  22. 22.

    Reali MAP, Patrizzi LJ (2007) The influence of the contact zone configuration on the efficiency of a DAF pilot plant. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on flotation in water and wastewater systems, vol 1, Seoul pp 135–142, 11–14 September 2007

  23. 23.

    Moruzzi RB, Reali MAP (2007) Método para determinação de distribuição de tamanho de microbolhas (DTMB) em sistemas flotação (FAD) para tratamento de águas utilizando a análise de imagem digital (Method for measuring bubbles sizes distribution (BSD) in drinking water treatment flotation (DAF) systems by using digital image analysis). Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental 12(3):273–283

  24. 24.

    Moruzzi RB, Oliveira SC (2013) Mathematical modelling and analysis of flocculation process in chambers in series. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 36:357–363

  25. 25.

    Reali MAP, Penetra RG, Campos JR (2007) Dissolved-air flotation associated with an anaerobic reactor, as applied to sewage treatment. Int J Environ Pollut 30(2):174–192

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to FAPESP for providing financial support of this research. This paper was presented in part at the 6th International Conference on Flotation in Water and Wastewater in New York (EUA) in November 2012.

Author information

Correspondence to R. B. Moruzzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moruzzi, R.B., Reali, M.A.P. The influence of floc size and hydraulic detention time on the performance of a dissolved air flotation (DAF) pilot unit in the light of a mathematical model. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 37, 2445–2452 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1221-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Particle
  • Image analysis
  • Mathematic model
  • Dissolved air flotation