Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, 81:54 | Cite as

The importance of pore throats in controlling the permeability of magmatic foams

  • Don R. BakerEmail author
  • Francesco Brun
  • Lucia Mancini
  • Julie L. Fife
  • Alexandra LaRue
  • Cedrick O’Shaughnessy
  • Reghan J. Hill
  • Margherita Polacci
Research Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Vesiculation of hydrous melts at 1 atm was studied in situ by synchrotron X-ray tomographic microscopy at the TOMCAT beamline of the Swiss Light Source (Villigen, Switzerland). Water-undersaturated basaltic, andesitic, trachyandesitic, and dacitic glasses were synthesized at high pressures and then laser heated at 1 atm. on the beamline, causing vesiculation. The porosity, bubble number density, size distributions of bubbles, and pore throats, as well as their tortuosity and connectivity, were measured in three-dimensional tomographic reconstructions of sample volumes, which were also used for lattice Boltzmann simulations of viscous permeabilities. Connectivity of bubbles by pore throats varied from ~ 100 to 105 mm−3, and for each sample correlated with porosity and permeability. Consideration of the results of this and previous studies of the viscous permeabilities of aphyric and crystal-poor magmatic samples demonstrated that at similar porosities permeability can vary by orders of magnitude, even for similar compositions. Comparison of the permeability relationships from this study with previous models (Degruyter et al., Bull Vulcanol 72:63–74, 2010; Burgisser et al., Earth Planet Sci Lett 470:37–47, 2017) relating porosity, characteristic pore-throat diameters, and tortuosity demonstrated good agreement. Modifying the Burgisser et al. model by using the maximum pore-throat diameter, instead of the average diameter, as the characteristic diameter reproduced the lattice Boltzmann permeabilities to within 1 order of magnitude. Correlations between average bubble diameters and maximum pore-throat diameters, and between porosity and tortuosity, in our experiments produced relationships that allow application of the modified Burgisser et al. model to predict permeability based only upon the average bubble diameter and porosity. These experimental results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that increasing bubble growth rates result in decreasing permeability of equivalent porosity foams. This effect of growth rate substantially contributes to the multiple orders of magnitude variations in the permeabilities of vesicular magmas at similar porosities.

Keywords

Magmatic foam Permeability Bubble and pore-throat sizes Bubble connectivity Synchrotron X-ray tomography 

Notes

Acknowledgments

All of the members of the TOMCAT team and of the Swiss Light Source at the Paul Scherrer Institut are thanked for their creation of the facility that allowed this study to be done and their continuing dedication to providing support to external users of the beamline. D.R. Baker thanks NSERC for their continued support for his research through the Discovery Grant Program. We also thank the editors, K. Cashman and J. Taddeucci, and the reviewers, H. Wright, L. Chevalier, and A. Burgisser, for their detailed and thoughtful comments that significantly improved the presentation of our research in this contribution.

Supplementary material

445_2019_1311_MOESM1_ESM.xls (5.2 mb)
ESM 1 (XLS 5365 kb)
445_2019_1311_MOESM2_ESM.gif (4.3 mb)
ESM 2 (GIF 4394 kb)
445_2019_1311_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (1.3 mb)
ESM 3 (PDF 1312 kb)

References

  1. Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans Am Inst Mineral Meteorol 146:54–62Google Scholar
  2. Bai L, Baker DR, Hill RJ (2010) Permeability of vesicular Stromboli basaltic glass: lattice Boltzmann simulations and laboratory measurements. J Geophys Res 115:B07201.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB007047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai L, Baker DR, Polacci M, Hill RJ (2011) In-situ degassing study on crystal-bearing Stromboli basaltic magmas: implications for Stromboli eruptions. Geophys Res Lett 38:L17309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker DR (2004) Piston-cylinder calibration at 400 to 500 MPa: a comparison of using water solubility in albite melt and NaCl melting. Am Mineral 89:1553–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker DR, Eggler DH (1987) Compositions of anhydrous and hydrous melts coexisting with plagioclase, augite, and olivine or low-Ca pyroxene from 1 atm. to 8 kbar: application to the Aleutian volcanic center of Atka. Am Mineral 72:12–28Google Scholar
  6. Blower JD (2001) Factors controlling permeability-porosity relationships in magmas. Bull Volcanol 63:497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouvet de Maisonneuve C, Bachmann O, Burgisser A (2008) Characterization of juvenile pyroclasts from the Kos Plateau Tuff (Aegean Arc): insights into the eruptive dynamics of a large rhyolitic eruption. Bull Volcanol 71:643–658.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-008-0250-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brun F, Mancini L, Kasae P, Favretto S, Dreossi D, Tromba G (2010) Pore3D: a software library for quantitative analysis of porous media. Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res A 615:326–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burgisser A, Gardner JE (2004) Experimental constraints on degassing and permeability in volcanic conduit flow. Bull Volcanol 67:42–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-004-0359-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgisser A, Chevalier L, Gardner JE, Castro JM (2017) The percolation threshold and permeability evolution of ascending magmas. Earth Planet Sci Lett 470:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carman PC (1937) Fluid flow through a granular bed. Trans Inst Chem Eng London 15:150–156Google Scholar
  12. Castro JM, Burgisser A, Schipper CI, Mancini S (2012) Mechanisms of bubble coalescence in silicic magmas. Bull Volcanol 74:2339–2352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colombier M, Wadsworth FB, Gurioli L, Scheu B, Kueppers U, Di Muro A, Dingwell DB (2017) The evolution of pore connectivity in volcanic rocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 462:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Consiglio R, Baker DR, Paul G, Stanley HE (2003) Continuum percolation thresholds for mixtures of spheres of different sizes. Physica A 319:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox SJ, Graner F (2004) Three-dimensional bubble clusters: shape, packing, and growth rate. Phys Rev E 69:031409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Degruyter W, Bachmann O, Burgisser A (2010) Controls on magma permeability in the volcanic conduit during the climatic phase of the Kos Plateau Tuff eruption (Aegean Arc). Bull Vulcanol 72:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Domb C (1972) A note on the series expansion method for clustering problems. Biometrika 59:209–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowd B, Campbell GH, Marr RB, Nagarkar V, Tipnis S, Axe L, Siddons DP (1999) Developments in synchrotron x-ray computed tomography at the National Synchrotron Light Source. Developments in X-Ray Tomography II, Proc SPIE 3772:224–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fagents SA, Gregg TKP, Lopes RMC (2013) Modeling volcanic processes: the physics and mathematics of volcanism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farquharson J, Heap MJ, Varley NR, Baud P, Reushclé T (2015) Permeability and porosity relationships of edifice-forming andesites: a combined field and laboratory study. Jour Volcan Geotherm Res 297:52–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferguson DJ, Gonnermann HM, Ruprech P, Plank T, Hauri EH, Houghton BF, Swanson DA (2016) Magma decompression rates during explosive eruptions of Kilauea volcano, Hawaii, recorded by melt embayments. Bull Volcanol 78:71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fife JL, Rappaz M, Pistone M, Celcer T, Mikuljan G, Stampanoni M (2012) Development of a laser-based heating system for in-situ synchrotron-based x-ray tomographic microscopy. J Synchrotron Radiat 19:352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fortin M-A, Riddle J, Desjardins-Langlais Y, Baker DR (2015) The effect of water on the sulfur concentration at sulfide saturation (SCSS) in natural melts. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 160:100–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garboczi EJ, Snyder KA, Douglas JF, Thorpe MF (1995) Geometrical percolation threshold of overlapping ellipsoids. Phys Rev E 52:819–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giordano D, Nichols ARL, Dingwell DB (2005) Glass transition temperatures of natural hydrous melts: a relationship with shear viscosity and implications for the welding process. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 142:105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giordano D, Russell JK, Dingwell DB (2008) Viscosity of magmatic liquids: a model. Earth Planet Sci Lett 278:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hill RJ, Koch DL, Ladd AJC (2001) The first effects of fluid inertia on flows in ordered and random arrays of spheres. J Fluid Mech 448:213–241. Ziff.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112001005948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hill RJ, Koch DL (2002) The transition from steady to weakly turbulent flow in a close-packed ordered array of spheres. J Fluid Mech 465:59–97.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112002008947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Humphreys MCS, Menand T, Blundy JD, Klimm K (2008) Magma ascent rates in explosive eruptions: constraints from H2O diffusion in melt inclusions. Earth Planet Sci Lett 270:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klug C, Cashman KV (1996) Permeability development in vesiculating magmas: implications for fragmentation. Bull Volcanol 58:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kraynik AM, Reinelt DA, van Swol F (2004) Structure of random foam. Phys Rev Lett 93:208301.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.208301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kushnir ARL, Martel C, Bourdier J-L, Heap MJ, Reushclé T, Erdmann S, Komorowski J-C, Cholik N (2016) Probing permeability and microstructure: unravelling the role of a low-permeability dome on the explosivity of Merapi (Indonesia). Jour Volcan Geotherm Res 316:56–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. LaRue A (2012) Bubble size distributions and magma-water interaction at Eyjafjallajökull volcano, Iceland. M.Sc. Thesis, McGill UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. La Spina G, Polacci M, Burton M, de’ Michieli Vitturi M (2017) Numerical investigation of permeability models for low viscosity magmas: application to the 2007 Stromboli effusive eruption. Earth Planet Sci Lett 473:279–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindoo A, Larsen JF, Cashman KV, Dunn AL, Neill OK (2016) An experimental study of permeability development as a function of crystal-free melt viscosity. Earth Planet Sci Lett 435:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindoo A, Larsen JF, Cashman KV, Oppenheimer J (2017) Crystal controls on permeability development and degassing in basaltic andesite magma. Geology 45:831–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu Y, Samaha N-T, Baker DR (2007) Sulfur concentration at sulfide saturation (SCSS) in magmatic silicate melts. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:1783–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lorenz CD, Ziff RM (2001) Precise determination of the critical percolation threshold for the three-dimensional 'Swiss cheese' model using a growth algorithm. J Chem Phys 114:3659–3661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marone F, Stampanoni M (2012) Regridding reconstruction algorithm for real time tomographic imaging. J Synchrotron Radiat 19:1029–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mokso R, Marone F, Stampanoni M (2010) Real time tomography at the Swiss Light Source. AIP Conf Proc 1234:87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mokso R, Schlepuetz CM, Theidel G, Billich H, Schmid E, Celcer T, Mikuljan G, Sala L, Marone F, Schlumpf N, Stampanoni M (2017) GigaFRoST: the gigabit fast readout system for tomography. J Synchrotron Radiat.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577517013522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mueller S, Melnik O, Spieler O, Scheu B, Dingwell DB (2005) Permeability and degassing of dome lavas undergoing rapid decompression: an experimental determination. Bull Volcanol 67:526–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mueller S, Scheu B, Spieler O, Dingwell DB (2008) Permeability control on magma fragmentation. Geology 36:499–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Navon O, Lyakhovsky V (1998) Vesiculation processes in silicic magmas. In: Gilbert, J.S., Sparks, R.S.J. (Eds.), The physics of explosive volcanic eruptions. Geol Soc Spec Pub Lond 145: 27–50Google Scholar
  45. Newman MEJ (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipt’s law. Contemp Phys 46:323–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nguyen CT, Gonnermann HM, Chen Y, Huber C, Maiorano AA, Gouldstone A, Dufek J (2013) Film drainage and the lifetime of bubbles. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 14:3616–3631.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ni H, Zhang L (2018) A general model of water diffusivity in calcalkaline silicate melts and glasses. Chem Geol 478:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Odgaard A, Gundersen HJG (1993) Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone 14:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ogata R, Odagaki T, Okazaki K (2005) Effects of poly-dispersity on continuum percolation. J Phs Condens Matter 17:4531–4538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Papale P, Moretti R, Barbato D (2006) The compositional dependence of the saturation surface of H2O + CO2 fluids in silicate melts. Chem Geol 229:78–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Polacci M, Baker DR, Bai L, Mancini L (2008) Large vesicles record pathways of degassing at basaltic volcanoes. Bull Volcanol 70:1023–1029.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-007-0184-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Polacci M, Baker DR, La Rue A, Mancini L, Allard P (2012) Degassing behaviour of vesiculated basaltic magmas: an example from Ambrym volcano, Vanuatu Arc. Jour Volcan Geotherm Res 233-234:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Polacci M, Bouvet de Maisonneuve C, Giordano D, Piochi M, Mancini L, Degruyter W, Bachmann O (2014) Permeability measurements of Campi Flegrei pyroclastic products: an example from the Campanian ignimbrite and Monte Nuovo eruptions. J Volcan Geotherm Res 2272:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rivers ML, Wang Y (2006) Recent developments in microtomography at GeoSoilEnviroCARS. Developments in X-Ray Tomography V, Proc SPIE 6318:J3180.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.681144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rust AC, Cashman KV (2004) Permeability of vesicular silicic magma: inertial and hysteresis effects. Earth Planet Sci Lett 228:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rust AC, Cashman KV (2011) Permeability controls on expansion and size distributions of pyroclasts. J Geophys Res 116:B11202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saar MO, Manga M (1999) Permeability-porosity relationship in vesicular basalts. Geophys Res Lett 26:111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schneider A, Rempel AW, Cashman KV (2012) Conduit degassing and thermal controls on eruption styles at Mount St. Helens. Earth Planet Sci Lett 357-358:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sparks RSJ (2003) Dynamics of magma degassing. In: Oppenheimer C, Pyle DM, and Barclay J (eds) Volcanic Degassing. Geol Soc Lond, Spec Publ 213:5–22Google Scholar
  60. Spieler O, Kennedy B, Kueppers U, Dingwell DB, Scheu B, Taddeucci J (2004) The fragmentation threshold of pyroclastic rocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 226:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stauffer D, Aharony A (1994) Introduction to percolation theory, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, p 181Google Scholar
  62. Takeuchi S, Nakashima S, Tomiya A (2008) Permeability measurements of natural and experimental volcanic materials with a simple permeameter: toward and understanding of magmatic degassing processes. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 177:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Takeuchi S, Tomiya A, Shinohara H (2009) Degassing conditions for permeable silicic magmas: implications from decompression experiments with constant rates. Earth Planet Sci Lett 283:101–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thovert JF, Salles J, Adler PM (1993) Computerized characterization of the geometry of real porous media: their discretization, analysis and interpretation. J Microsc 170:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wright HMN, Cashman KV, Gottesfeld EH, Roberts JJ (2009) Pore structure of volcanic clasts: measurements of permeability and electrical conductivity. Earth Planet Sci Lett 280:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yokoyama T, Takeuchi S (2009) Porosimetry of vesicular volcanic products by a water-expulsion method and the relationship of pore characteristics to permeability. J Geophys Res 114:B0221.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005758 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zandomeneghi D, Voltolini M, Mancini L, Brun F, Dreossi D, Polacci M (2010) Quantitative analysis of X-ray microtomography images of geomaterials: application to volcanic rocks. Geosphere 6:793–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhou J-Q, Chen Y-F, Wang L, Rayani CM (2019) Universal relationship between viscous and inertial permeability of geologica porous media. Geophys Res Lett 46:1441–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ziff RM, Torquato S (2017) Percolation of disorderd jammed sphere packings. J Phys A Math Theor 50:085001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa5664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Volcanology & Chemistry of the Earth's Interior 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earth and Planetary SciencesMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A.TriesteItaly
  3. 3.Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) - Sezione di TriesteTriesteItaly
  4. 4.Laboratory for Synchrotron Radiation, Swiss Light SourcePaul Scherrer InstitutVilligenSwitzerland
  5. 5.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Department of Chemical EngineeringMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  7. 7.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations