Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, 81:20 | Cite as

Critical volcanology? Thinking holistically about risk and uncertainty

  • Amy DonovanEmail author
Forum Contribution

Abstract

This paper tackles two related issues in dealing with so-called “wicked” problems: the challenge for scientists wishing to provide useful policy advice whilst maintaining scientific integrity and the challenge of integrating multiple disciplines across the social and physical sciences. It focusses particularly on the problems associated with volcanic risks—specifically those problems that threaten to “politicise” volcanology via the role of scientists in advising authorities. The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 calls for a greater role for science in reducing risk. It conceives of science very broadly—incorporating social, physical, medical, economic, agricultural and behavioural sciences into the policy process. This presents an exciting opportunity; yet, there are difficulties in approaching the science-policy encounter in the context of risk, especially under high uncertainty and involving multiple disciplines. The paper reviews literature in volcanic risk assessment, science studies, and policy studies to suggest that risk requires critical, reflexive, transparent, and discursive management through the availability of spaces in which academics of all disciplines, policymakers, and stakeholders can openly discuss method, meaning, and interpretation of evidence.

Keywords

Volcanic risk Interdisciplinary volcanology Philosophy of risk Risk assessment Risk and uncertainty 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Jenni Barclay and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments that enhanced the manuscript, and Raffaello Cioni and Andy Harris for their careful editorial handling of this manuscript.

References

  1. Armijos MT, Phillips J, Wilkinson E, Barclay J, Hicks A, Palacios P, Mothes P, Stone J (2017) Adapting to changes in volcanic behaviour: formal and informal interactions for enhanced risk management at Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador. Glob Environ Chang 45:217–226Google Scholar
  2. Aspinall WP (2006) Structured elicitation of expert judgement for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment in volcanic eruptions. In: H.M. Mader SC, C. Connor, L. Connor (ed) Statistics in volcanology. Geological Society of London, London, pp 15–30Google Scholar
  3. Aspinall W (2010) A route to more tractable expert advice. Nature 463(7279):294–295Google Scholar
  4. Aspinall W (2012) Comment on Donovan, et al, 2012 "social studies of volcanology: expert advice and knowledge generation on active volcanoes". Bulletin of Volcanology this issueGoogle Scholar
  5. Aspinall WP, Cooke RM (1998) Expert judgement and the Montserrat volcano eruption. In: Mosleh AB (ed) Proceedings of the 4th international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management. Springer, New York City, pp 2113–2118Google Scholar
  6. Aspinall W, Sparks RSJ (2004) Volcanology and the law. IAVCEI News 1(4)Google Scholar
  7. Aspinall WP, Woo G, Voight B, Baxter PJ (2003) Evidence-based volcanology: application to eruption crises. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 128:273–285Google Scholar
  8. Aven T, Renn O (2009) The role of quantitative risk assessments for characterizing risk and uncertainty and delineating appropriate risk management options, with special emphasis on terrorism risk. Risk Anal 29(4):587–600Google Scholar
  9. Bachelard G (2002) The formation of the scientific mind a contribution to a psychoanalysis of objective knowledgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Bamber JL, Aspinall W (2013) An expert judgement assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets. Nat Clim Chang 3(4):424–427Google Scholar
  11. Barclay J, Haynes K, Mitchell T, Solana C, Teeuw R, Darnell A, Crosweller HS, Cole P, Pyle D, Lowe C, Fearnley C, Kelman I (2008) Framing volcanic risk communication within disaster risk reduction: finding ways for the social and physical sciences to work together. Geol Soc Lond, Spec Publ 305(1):163–177Google Scholar
  12. Barry A, Born G, Weszkalnys G (2008) Logics of interdisciplinarity. Econ Soc 37(1):20–49Google Scholar
  13. Bauer MW (2009) The evolution of public understanding of science—discourse and comparative evidence. Sci Technol Soc 14:221–240.  https://doi.org/10.1177/097172180901400202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baxter PJ, Aspinall WP, Neri A, Zuccaro G, Spence RJS, Cioni R, Woo G (2008) Emergency planning and mitigation at Vesuvius: a new evidence-based approach. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 178(3):454–473Google Scholar
  15. Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  16. Benessia A, De Marchi B (2017) When the earth shakes … and science with it. The management and communication of uncertainty in the L’Aquila earthquake. Futures 91:35–45Google Scholar
  17. Betz G (2013) In defence of the value free ideal. Eur J Philos Sci 3(2):207–220Google Scholar
  18. Beven K (2016) Facets of uncertainty: epistemic uncertainty, non-stationarity, likelihood, hypothesis testing, and communication. Hydrol Sci J 61:1652–1665Google Scholar
  19. Beven K, Almeida S, Aspinall W et al (2016) Epistemic uncertainties and natural hazard risk assessment–part 2: different natural hazard areas. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2016:1–1Google Scholar
  20. Bhaskar R (2013 (1975)) A realist theory of science. Routledge,Google Scholar
  21. Bijker WE, Bal R, Hendriks R (2009) The paradox of scientific authority: the role of scientific advice in democracies. MIT pressGoogle Scholar
  22. Braun B, Castree N (2005) Remaking reality: nature at the millenium. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Bretton RJ, Gottsmann J, Aspinall WP, Christie R (2015) Implications of legal scrutiny processes (including the L’Aquila trial and other recent court cases) for future volcanic risk governance. J Appl Volcanol 4(1):1Google Scholar
  24. Bretton RJ, Gottsmann J, Christie R (2018) Hazard communication by volcanologists: part 2-quality standards for volcanic hazard assessments. J Appl Volcanol 7:10Google Scholar
  25. Brown MB (2009) Science in democracy: expertise, institutions and representation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  26. Brown C, Brown E, Murray-Rust D, Cojocaru G, Savin C, Rounsevell M (2015) Analysing uncertainties in climate change impact assessment across sectors and scenarios. Clim Chang 128:293–306Google Scholar
  27. Button G (2016) Disaster culture: knowledge and uncertainty in the wake of human and environmental catastrophe. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Calder E, Wagner K, Ogburn S (2015) Volcanic hazard maps. In: Volcanic hazard maps. Global Volcanic Hazards and Risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 335–342Google Scholar
  29. Castanos H, Lomnitz C (2002) PSHA: is it science? Engineering Geology 66(3–4):315–317Google Scholar
  30. Castree N, Braun B (2001) Social nature: theory, practice, and politics. Blackwell Publishers Oxford, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. Castree N, Adams WM, Barry J, Brockington D, Büscher B, Corbera E, Demeritt D, Duffy R, Felt U, Neves K (2014) Changing the intellectual climate. Nat Clim Chang 4(9):763–768Google Scholar
  32. Cornell CA (1968) Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58(5):1583-&Google Scholar
  33. Curtis A (2012) The science of subjectivity. Geology 40(1):95–96Google Scholar
  34. Cutter SL (2003) The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93(1):1–12Google Scholar
  35. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social science quarterly, 84(2):242–261Google Scholar
  36. Cutter SL, Ismail-Zadeh A, Alcantara-Ayala I, Altan O, Baker DN, Briceno S, Gupta H, Holloway A, Johnston D, McBean GA (2015) Global risks: Pool knowledge to stem losses from disasters. Nature 522:277–279Google Scholar
  37. Daston L (1992) Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Soc Stud Sci 22(4):597–618Google Scholar
  38. Daston L (1994) How probabilities came to be objective and subjective. Hist Math 21(3):330–344Google Scholar
  39. Davies SR (2008) Constructing communication: talking to scientists about talking to the public. Sci Commun 29:413–434.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008316222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. De Finetti B (1974) Theory of probability. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. De Marchi B (2015) Risk governance and the integration of different types of knowledge. In risk governance (pp. 149-165). Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  42. Demeritt D, Nobert S, Cloke H, Pappenberger F (2010) Challenges in communicating and using ensembles in operational flood forecasting. Meteorol Appl 17(2):209–222Google Scholar
  43. Demeritt D, Nobert S, Cloke HL, Pappenberger F (2013) The European flood alert system and the communication, perception, and use of ensemble predictions for operational flood risk management. Hydrol Process 27(1):147–157Google Scholar
  44. Dessai S, Hulme M (2004) Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities? Clim Pol 4(2):107–128Google Scholar
  45. Donovan A (2016) Geopower Reflections on the critical geography of disasters. Progress in Human Geography:0309132515627020Google Scholar
  46. Donovan A, Oppenheimer C (2014) Science, policy and place in volcanic disasters: insights from Montserrat. Environ Sci Pol 39:150–161Google Scholar
  47. Donovan A, Oppenheimer C (2015a) At the mercy of the mountain? Field stations and the culture of volcanology. Environ Plan A 47(1):156–171Google Scholar
  48. Donovan A, Oppenheimer C (2015b) Resilient science: the civic epistemology of disaster risk reduction. Sci Pub Pol:scv039Google Scholar
  49. Donovan A, Oppenheimer C, Bravo M (2012a) Contested boundaries: delineating the "safe zone" on Montserrat. Appl Geogr 35:508–514Google Scholar
  50. Donovan A, Oppenheimer C, Bravo M (2012b) Reply to comment from W.P. Aspinall on “Social studies of volcanology: knowledge generation and expert advice on active volcanoes” by Amy Donovan, Clive Oppenheimer and Michael Bravo [Bull Volcanol (2012) 74:677-689]. Bull Volcanol 74(6):1571–1574Google Scholar
  51. Donovan A, Oppenheimer C, Bravo M (2012c) Science at the policy interface: volcano-monitoring technologies and volcanic hazard management. Bull Volcanol 74(5):1005–1022Google Scholar
  52. Donovan A, Oppenheimer C, Bravo M (2012d) The use of belief-based probabilistic methods in volcanology: Scientists’ views and implications for risk assessments. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 247-248:168–180Google Scholar
  53. Donovan A, Eiser JR, Sparks RSJ (2015) Expert opinion and probabilistic volcanic risk assessment. J Risk Res:1–18Google Scholar
  54. Donovan A, Ayala IA, Eiser J, Sparks R (2018) Risk perception at a persistently active volcano: warnings and trust at Popocatépetl volcano in Mexico, 2012–2014. Bull Volcanol 80(5):47Google Scholar
  55. Doubleday R (2007) Organizing accountability: co-production of technoscientific and social worlds in a nanoscience laboratory. Area 39(2):166–175Google Scholar
  56. Douglas H (2000) Inductive risk and values in science. Philos Sci 67:559–579Google Scholar
  57. Douglas H (2009) Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh PreGoogle Scholar
  58. Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) How can we know the risks we face? Why risk selection is a social Process1. Risk Anal 2(2):49–58Google Scholar
  59. Doyle EE, Johnston DM, McClure J, Paton D (2011) The communication of uncertain scientific advice during natural hazard events. N Z J Psychol 40(4):39–50Google Scholar
  60. Doyle EE, McClure J, Johnston DM, Paton D (2014) Communicating likelihoods and probabilities in forecasts of volcanic eruptions. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 272:1–15Google Scholar
  61. EFSA (2014) Guidance on expert knowledge elicitation in food and feed safety risk assessment. EFSA J 12(6):3734Google Scholar
  62. Eiser JR, Donovan A, Sparks RSJ (2015) Risk perceptions and trust following the 2010 and 2011 Icelandic volcanic ash crises. Risk Anal 35(2):332–343Google Scholar
  63. Espinoza AE, Espinoza CE, Fuentes AA (2015) Retornando a Chaitén: diagnóstico participativo de una comunidad educativa desplazada por un desastre socionatural. Magallania (Punta Arenas) 43(3):65–76Google Scholar
  64. Fearnley CJ, Beaven S (2018) Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication. Bull VolcanolGoogle Scholar
  65. Few R, Armijos MT, Barclay J (2017) Living with Volcan Tungurahua: the dynamics of vulnerability during prolonged volcanic activity. Geoforum 80:72–81Google Scholar
  66. Fischer F (2000) Citizens, experts and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  67. Foley R (2018) The geography of insight: the sciences, the humanities, how they differ. Oxford University Press, Why They MatterGoogle Scholar
  68. Fearnley CJ, Bird DK, Haynes K, McGuire WJ, Jolly G eds (2018) Observing the Volcano World: Volcano Crisis Communication. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  69. Friedman DP (2008) Public outreach: a scientific imperative. J Neurosci 28:11743–11745Google Scholar
  70. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1992) Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal scienceGoogle Scholar
  71. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1995) Science for the post normal age. Perspectives on ecological integrity. Springer, In, pp 146–161Google Scholar
  72. Gaillard JC, Mercer J (2013) From knowledge to action: bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Prog Hum Geogr 37:93–114Google Scholar
  73. Gallopín GC, Funtowicz S, O'Connor M, Ravetz J (2001) Science for the twenty-first century: from social contract to the scientific core. Int Soc Sci J 53(168):219–229Google Scholar
  74. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  75. Giddens A (1999) 1999. Runaway World, Reith LecturesGoogle Scholar
  76. Giere RN (2010 (2006)) scientific perspectivism. University of Chicago Press,Google Scholar
  77. Gieryn TF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am Sociol Rev 48(6):781–795Google Scholar
  78. Gigerenzer G, Hertwig R, Van Den Broek E, Fasolo B, Katsikopoulos KV (2005) “A 30% chance of rain tomorrow”: how does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Analysis: An Int J 25(3):623–629Google Scholar
  79. Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W, Kurz-milcke E, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S (2007) Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychol Sci Public Interest 8(2):53–96Google Scholar
  80. Giordano G, Bretton R, Calder ES, Cas R, Gottsmann J, Lindsay J, Newhall C, Pallister J, Papale P, Rodriguez L (2016) Toward IAVCEI guidelines on the roles and responsibilities of scientists involved in volcanic hazard evaluation, risk mitigation, and crisis response. Bull Volcanol 78:1–3Google Scholar
  81. Goitom B, Oppenheimer C, Hammond JO, Grandin R, Barnie T, Donovan A, Ogubazghi G, Yohannes E, Kibrom G, Kendall J-M (2015) First recorded eruption of Nabro volcano, Eritrea, 2011. Bull Volcanol 77(10):1–21Google Scholar
  82. Gould SJ (2000) Deconstructing the" science wars" by reconstructing an old mold. Science 287(5451):253–261Google Scholar
  83. Gregg CE, Houghton BF, Johnston DM, Paton D, Swanson DA (2004) The perception of volcanic risk in Kona communities from Mauna Loa and Hualalai volcanoes, Hawai'i. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 130:179–196Google Scholar
  84. Gregg CE, Houghton BF, Paton D, Swanson DA, Lachman R, Bonk WJ (2008) Hawaiian cultural influences on support for lava flow hazard mitigation measures during the January 1960 eruption of Kilauea volcano, Kapoho, Hawai[`]i. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172(3–4):300–307Google Scholar
  85. Hacking I (1975) The emergence of probability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  86. Hacking I (1990) The taming of chance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  87. Hajer M (2003) A frame in the fields: policymaking and the reinvention of politics. In: Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  88. Hall SS (2011) Scientists on trial: at fault? Nature News 477(7364):264–269Google Scholar
  89. Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem Stud 14(3):575–599Google Scholar
  90. Harris AJ (2015) Forecast communication through the newspaper part 2: perceptions of uncertainty. Bull Volcanol 77(4):30Google Scholar
  91. Hastrup K (2012) Anticipating nature: the productive uncertainty of climate models. In the social life of climate change models (pp. 11-39). RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  92. Haynes K, Barclay J, Pidgeon N (2007) The issue of trust and its influence on risk communication during a volcanic crisis. Bull Volcanol 70:605–621Google Scholar
  93. Hermansson H (2012) Defending the conception of “objective risk”. Risk Analysis: An Int J 32(1):16–24Google Scholar
  94. Hicks, A. and Few, R., 2015. Trajectories of social vulnerability during the Soufrière Hills volcanic crisis. Journal of applied volcanology, 4(1), p.10Google Scholar
  95. Hinchliffe S (2001) Indeterminacy in-decisions–science, policy and politics in the BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy) crisis. Trans Inst Br Geogr 26(2):182–204Google Scholar
  96. Hincks TK, Komorowski J-C, Sparks SR, Aspinall WP (2014) Retrospective analysis of uncertain eruption precursors at La Soufrière volcano, Guadeloupe, 1975–77: volcanic hazard assessment using a Bayesian belief network approach. J Appl Volcanol 3(1):3Google Scholar
  97. Hulme M (2008) Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change. Trans Inst Br Geogr 33(1):5–11Google Scholar
  98. Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  99. Hulme M (2010) Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. Glob Environ Chang 20(4):558–564Google Scholar
  100. Hulme M (2011) Meet the humanities. Nat Clim Chang 1(4):177–179Google Scholar
  101. Hulme M (2014) Climate change and virtue: an apologetic. Humanities 3(3):299–312Google Scholar
  102. Hulme M (2016) Weathered: cultures of climate. SAGE,Google Scholar
  103. Irwin A (2014) Risk, science and public communication. Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology:160–172Google Scholar
  104. Jasanoff S (1990) The fifth branch: science advisors as policymakers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  105. Jasanoff S (1993) Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis 1, 2. Risk Anal 13(2):123–129Google Scholar
  106. Jasanoff S (1996) Beyond epistemology: relativism and engagement in the politics of science. Soc Stud Sci 26(2):393–418Google Scholar
  107. Jasanoff S (1998) The political science of risk perception. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 59:91–99Google Scholar
  108. Jasanoff S (1999) The songlines of risk. Env Val 8:135–152Google Scholar
  109. Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41:223–244Google Scholar
  110. Jasanoff S (2004a) Science and citizenship: a new synergy. Sci Public Policy 31(2):90–94Google Scholar
  111. Jasanoff S (2004b) States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, Abingdon, InGoogle Scholar
  112. Jasanoff S (2005) Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  113. Jasanoff S (2007) Technologies of humility. Nature 450:33Google Scholar
  114. Jasanoff S, Martello M (2004) Earthly politics: local and global in environmental governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, InGoogle Scholar
  115. Johnson JB, Watson LM, Palma JL, Dunham EM, Anderson JF (2018) Forecasting the eruption of an open-vent volcano using resonant infrasound tones. Geophys Res Lett 45(5):2213–2220Google Scholar
  116. Joslyn S, Savelli S (2010) Communicating forecast uncertainty: public perception of weather forecast uncertainty. Meteorol Appl 17:180–195.  https://doi.org/10.1002/met.190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Kant I, Guyer P (1998) Critique of pure reason. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  118. Kelman I, Mather TA (2008) Living with volcanoes: the sustainable livelihoods approach for volcano-related opportunities. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172(3–4):189–198Google Scholar
  119. Komorowski J, Hincks T, Sparks R, Aspinall W, Consortium CAP (2015) Improving crisis decision-making at times of uncertain volcanic unrest (Guadeloupe, 1976). Global Volcanic Hazards and Risk 255Google Scholar
  120. Krüger F, Bankoff G, Cannon T, Orlowski B, Schipper ELF (2015) Cultures and disasters: understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  121. Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  122. Kuhn T (1977) Objectivity, value judgement, and theory choice. In: Kuhn T (ed) The essential tension: studies in scientific tradition and change. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 320–329Google Scholar
  123. Lacey H (2005) Is science value free?: values and scientific understanding. Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
  124. Lane SN (2017) Slow science, the geographical expedition, and Critical Physical Geography. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 61(1):84–101Google Scholar
  125. Lane SN, Odoni N, Landström C, Whatmore SJ, Ward N, Bradley S (2011) Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method. Trans Inst Br Geogr 36(1):15–36Google Scholar
  126. Latour B (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  127. Lave R (2015) Introduction to special issue on critical physical geography. In: SAGE publications Sage UK: London, England,Google Scholar
  128. Lave R, Wilson MW, Barron ES, Biermann C, Carey MA, Duvall CS, Johnson L, Lane KM, McClintock N, Munroe D (2014) Intervention: critical physical geography. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien 58(1):1–10Google Scholar
  129. Levidow L (2001) Precautionary uncertainty: regulating GM crops in Europe. Soc Stud Sci 31(6):842–874Google Scholar
  130. Levidow L, Carr S (2007) Europeanising advisory expertise: the role of 'independent, objective and transparent' scientific advice in Agri-biotech regulation. Environ Plann C: Gov Policy 25:880–895Google Scholar
  131. Lindsay J, Marzocchi W, Jolly G, Constantinescu R, Selva J, Sandri L (2010) Towards real-time eruption forecasting in the Auckland volcanic field: application of BET_EF during the new Zealand National Disaster Exercise ‘Ruaumoko’. Bull Volcanol 72(2):185–204Google Scholar
  132. Livingstone DN (2003) Putting science in its place: geographies of scientific knowledge. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  133. Loughlin SC, Sparks RSJ, Brown SK, Jenkins SF, Vye-Brown C (2015) Global volcanic hazards and risk. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  134. Lövbrand E, Beck S, Chilvers J, Forsyth T, Hedrén J, Hulme M, Lidskog R, Vasileiadou E (2015) Who speaks for the future of earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Glob Environ Chang 32:211–218Google Scholar
  135. MacLeod M (2018) What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice. Synthese 195:697–720Google Scholar
  136. Mansilla VB (2010) Learning to synthesize: the development of interdisciplinary understanding. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 288–306Google Scholar
  137. Marzocchi W, Woo G (2009) Principles of volcanic risk metrics: theory and the case study of Mount Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei, Italy. J Geophys Res 114Google Scholar
  138. Marzocchi W, Sandri L, Selva J (2008) BET_EF: a probabilistic tool for long- and short-term eruption forecasting. Bull Volcanol 70(5):623–632Google Scholar
  139. Marzocchi W, Newhall C, Woo G (2012) The scientific management of volcanic crises. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 247-248(0):181–189Google Scholar
  140. Miller NE (1986) The scientist’s responsibility for public information: a guide to effective communication with the media. In: Friedman SM, Dunwoody S, Rogers CL (eds) Scientists and journalists: reporting science as news. The Free Press, New York, pp 239–253Google Scholar
  141. Mogi K (1958) Relations between the eruptions of various volcanoes and the deformation of the ground surfaces around them. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 36:99–134Google Scholar
  142. Morgan MG (2014) Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(20):7176–7184Google Scholar
  143. Morss R.E, Demuth JL and Lazo JK (2008) Communicating uncertainty in weather forecasts: A survey of the US public. Weather and forecasting, 23(5):974–991Google Scholar
  144. Mulargia F, Stark PB, Geller RJ (2017) Why is probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) still used? Phys Earth Planet Inter 264:63–75Google Scholar
  145. Mythen G and Walklate S (2006) Beyond the risk society: critical reflections on risk and human security: critical reflections on risk and human security. McGraw-hill education (UK)Google Scholar
  146. Neri A, Aspinall WP, Cioni R, Bertagnini A, Baxter PJ, Zuccaro G, Andronico D, Barsotti S, Cole PD, Esposti Ongaro T, Hincks TK, Macedonio G, Papale P, Rosi M, Santacroce R, Woo G (2008) Developing an event tree for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment at Vesuvius. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 178(3):397–415Google Scholar
  147. Newhall C, Hoblitt RP (2002) Constructing event trees for volcanic crises. Bull Volcanol 64:3–20Google Scholar
  148. Newhall CG, Pallister JS (2015) Using multiple data sets to populate probabilistic volcanic event trees. In: Volcanic hazards. Elsevier, Risks and Disasters, pp 203–232Google Scholar
  149. Nowotny H (2003) Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Sci Public Policy 30(3):151–156Google Scholar
  150. O'Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser R, Garthwaite P (2006) Uncertain judgements: eliciting experts' probabilities. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  151. Owens S (2000) "engaging the public": information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environ Plan A 32:1141–1148Google Scholar
  152. Owens S (2015) Knowledge, policy, and expertise: the UK Royal Commission on environmental pollution 1970–2011. OUP Oxford,Google Scholar
  153. Papale P (2017) Rational volcanic hazard forecasts and the use of volcanic alert levels. J Appl Volcanol 6(1):13Google Scholar
  154. Pate-Cornell E (2002) Risk and uncertainty analysis in government safety decisions. Risk Anal 22(3):633–646Google Scholar
  155. Paton D, Sagala S, Okada N, Jang LJ, Burgelt PT, Gregg CE (2010) Making sense of natural hazard mitigation: personal, social and cultural influences. Env Haz 9(2):183–196Google Scholar
  156. Pearce W, Brown B, Nerlich B, Koteyko N (2015) Communicating climate change: conduits, content, and consensus. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 6:613–626Google Scholar
  157. Pereira ÂG, Vaz SG, Tognetti S (2017) Uncertainty, assumptions and value commitments in the knowledge base of complex environmental problems. Interfaces between Science and Society. Routledge, In, pp 64–81Google Scholar
  158. Pescaroli G, Alexander D (2015) A definition of cascading disasters and cascading effects: going beyond the †œtoppling dominos†metaphor. Planet@ Risk 3(1)Google Scholar
  159. Pidgeon N, Fischhoff B (2011) The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat Clim Chang 1(1):35–41Google Scholar
  160. Pidgeon NF, Lorenzoni I, Poortinga W (2008) Climate change or nuclear power—no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Glob Environ Chang 18(1):69–85Google Scholar
  161. Popper K (1956 (published 1982)) Realism and the aim of science. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  162. Popper KR (1957) Probability magic or knowledge out of ignorance. Dialectica 11(3–4):354–374Google Scholar
  163. Popper K (1959 (German original, 1935)) the logic of scientific discovery. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  164. Popper K (1963) Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge,Google Scholar
  165. Porter TM (1996) Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  166. Potter SH, Jolly GE, Neall VE, Johnston DM, Scott BJ (2014) Communicating the status of volcanic activity: revising New Zealand’s volcanic alert level system. J Appl Volcanol 3(1):13Google Scholar
  167. Powell RC (2007) Geographies of science: histories, localities, practices, futures. Prog Hum Geogr 31(3):309–329Google Scholar
  168. Proctor R (1991) Value-free science?: purity and power in modern knowledge. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  169. Proctor RN, Schiebinger L (2008) Agnotology: the making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, InGoogle Scholar
  170. Renn O (2008) Risk governance. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  171. Roeser S, Hillerbrand R, Sandin P and Peterson M Eds., (2012) Handbook of risk theory: epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  172. Sandri L, Marzocchi W, Zaccarelli L (2004) A new perspective in identifying the precursory patterns of eruptions. Bull Volcanol 66:263–275Google Scholar
  173. Scolobig A, Mechler R, Komendantova N, Liu W, Schröter D, Patt A (2014) The co-production of scientific advice and decision making under uncertainty: lessons from the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake, Italy. Planet@ risk 2(2):71–76Google Scholar
  174. Segerstråle UCO (2000) Beyond the science wars: the missing discourse about science and society. SUNY PressGoogle Scholar
  175. Shackley S, Wynne B (1996) Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: boundary-ordering devices and authority. Sci Technol Hum Values 21(3):275–302Google Scholar
  176. Sheldrake TE, Aspinall W, Odbert H, Wadge G, Sparks R (2017) Understanding causality and uncertainty in volcanic observations: an example of forecasting eruptive activity on Soufrière Hills volcano, Montserrat. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 341:287–300Google Scholar
  177. Sparks RSJ, Aspinall W (2004) Volcanic activity: Frontiers and challenges in forecasting, prediction and risk assessment. In: The State of the Planet: Frontiers and challenges in Geophysics. Geophysical Monograph 150; IUGG Volume 19,Google Scholar
  178. Spiegelhalter DJ (2008) Understanding uncertainty. Ann Fam Med 6(3):196–197Google Scholar
  179. Spiegelhalter D (2017) Risk and uncertainty communication. Annu Rev Stat Its Appl 4:31–60Google Scholar
  180. Spiegelhalter DJ, Riesch H (2011) Don't know, can't know: embracing deeper uncertainties when analysing risks. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 369(1956):4730–4750Google Scholar
  181. Stengers I (2013) Une autre science Est possible. Manifeste pour un ralentissement de sciences. Paris, La DécouverteGoogle Scholar
  182. Stephens EM, Edwards TL, Demeritt D (2012) Communicating probabilistic information from climate model ensembles—lessons from numerical weather prediction. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 3:409–426Google Scholar
  183. Stirling A (2003) Risk, uncertainty and precaution: some instrumental implications from the social sciences. In: Berkhout F, M. Leach, I. Scoones (ed) negotiating environmental change: new perspectives from social science. Edward Elgar publishing, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  184. Stirling A (2007) Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. EMBO Rep 8(4):309–315Google Scholar
  185. Stirling A (2008) Opening up and closing down. Sci Technol Hum Values 33(2):262–294Google Scholar
  186. Stirling A (2010) Keep it complex. Nature 468(7327):1029–1031Google Scholar
  187. Stirling, A., 2012. Opening up the politics of knowledge and power in bioscience. PLoS Biol, 10(1), p.e1001233Google Scholar
  188. Sunstein CR (2005) Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  189. Surono JP, Pallister J, Boichu M, Buongiorno MF, Budisantoso A, Costa F, Andreastuti S, Prata F, Schneider D, Clarisse L, Humaida H, Sumarti S, Bignami C, Griswold J, Carn S, Oppenheimer C, Lavigne F (2012) The 2010 explosive eruption of Java's Merapi volcano—a ‘100-year’ event. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 241–242:121–135Google Scholar
  190. Sutherland WJ, Bellingan L, Bellingham JR, Blackstock JJ, Bloomfield RM, Bravo M, Cadman VM, Cleevely DD, Clements A, Cohen AS (2012) A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda. PLoS One 7(3):e31824Google Scholar
  191. Sword-Daniels V, Eriksen C, Hudson-Doyle EE, Alaniz R, Adler C, Schenk T, Vallance S (2016) Embodied uncertainty: living with complexity and natural hazards. Journal of Risk Research:1–18Google Scholar
  192. Tadaki M, Brierley G, Dickson M, Le Heron R, Salmond J (2015) Cultivating critical practices in physical geography. Geogr J 181(2):160–171Google Scholar
  193. Tazieff H (1977) La Soufriere, volcanology and forecasting. Nature 269:96–97Google Scholar
  194. Thissen W, Kwakkel J, Mens M, van der Sluijs J, Stemberger S, Wardekker A, Wildschut D (2017) Dealing with uncertainties in fresh water supply: experiences in the Netherlands. Water Resour Manag 31:703–725Google Scholar
  195. Thompson MA, Lindsay JM, Gaillard J-C (2015) The influence of probabilistic volcanic hazard map properties on hazard communication. J Appl Volcanol 4(1):6Google Scholar
  196. Tilling RI (2008) The critical role of volcano monitoring in risk reduction. Adv Geosci 14:3–11Google Scholar
  197. Tobin GA, Whiteford LM, Jones EC, Murphy AD (2007) Chronic hazard: weighing risk against the effects of emergency evacuation from popocatépetl, México. In: Papers and Proceedings of Applied Geography Conferences. [np]; 1998, p 288Google Scholar
  198. Tonini R, Sandri L, Thompson MA (2015) PyBetVH: a Python tool for probabilistic volcanic hazard assessment and for generation of Bayesian hazard curves and maps. Comput Geosci 79:38–46Google Scholar
  199. Torrent JCR, Herrera SR, Bustamante FM (2017) El proyecto nueva Chaitén: La asincronía entre Estado, academia y comunidad. AUS [Arquitectura/Urbanismo/Sustentabilidad] (19):73-79Google Scholar
  200. Ugarte AM, Salgado M (2014) Sujetos en emergencia: acciones colectivas de resistencia y enfrentamiento del riesgo ante desastres; el caso de Chaitén, Chile. Revista Invi 29(80):143–168Google Scholar
  201. Victor DG (2015) Embed the social sciences in climate policy. Nature 520(April):27–29Google Scholar
  202. Wadge G, Aspinall W, Barclay J (2009) Risk-based policy support for volcanic hazard mitigation. Foreign and Commonwealth Office, London, InGoogle Scholar
  203. Weigold MF (2001) Communicating science: a review of the literature. Sci Commun 23:164–193.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001023002005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Wilson CJ (2017) Volcanoes: characteristics, tipping points, and those pesky unknown unknowns. Elements 13(1):41–46Google Scholar
  205. Winson AE, Costa F, Newhall CG, Woo G (2014) An analysis of the issuance of volcanic alert levels during volcanic crises. J Appl Volcanol 3(1):14Google Scholar
  206. Wisner B, Blaikie PM, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters. Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
  207. Wisner B, Gaillard JC, Kelman I (2012) Handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction and management. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  208. Wittgenstein L (1921 (this edition 2001)) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  209. Wong-Parodi G, Krishnamurti T, Davis A, Schwartz D, Fischhoff B (2016) A decision science approach for integrating social science in climate and energy solutions. Nature Clim Change 6(6):563–569Google Scholar
  210. Woo G (2008) Probabilistic criteria for volcano evacuation decisions. Nat Hazards 45:87–97Google Scholar
  211. Woo G (2012) Calculating catastrophe. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  212. Woo G (2015) Cost–benefit analysis in volcanic risk. In: Volcanic hazards. Elsevier, Risks and Disasters, pp 289–300Google Scholar
  213. Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Glob Environ Chang 2(2):111–127Google Scholar
  214. Wynne B (2001) Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Sci Cult 10(4):445–481Google Scholar
  215. Wynne B (2004) Risk as globalising “democratic” discourse? Framing subjects and citizens. In: Leach M (ed) Science and citizens: globalisation and the challenge of engagement. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  216. Wynne BE, Shackley S (1994) Environmental models: truth machines of social heuristics? Globe 21:6–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Volcanology & Chemistry of the Earth's Interior 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations