Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Vertical stratification of a temperate forest caterpillar community in eastern North America

Abstract

Vertical niche partitioning might be one of the main driving forces explaining the high diversity of forest ecosystems. However, the forest’s vertical dimension has received limited investigation, especially in temperate forests. Thus, our knowledge about how communities are vertically structured remains limited for temperate forest ecosystems. In this study, we investigated the vertical structuring of an arboreal caterpillar community in a temperate deciduous forest of eastern North America. Within a 0.2-ha forest stand, all deciduous trees ≥ 5 cm diameter at breast height (DBH) were felled and systematically searched for caterpillars. Sampled caterpillars were assigned to a specific stratum (i.e. understory, midstory, or canopy) depending on their vertical position and classified into feeding guild as either exposed feeders or shelter builders (i.e. leaf rollers, leaf tiers, webbers). In total, 3892 caterpillars representing 215 species of butterflies and moths were collected and identified. While stratum had no effect on caterpillar density, feeding guild composition changed significantly with shelter-building caterpillars becoming the dominant guild in the canopy. Species richness and diversity were found to be highest in the understory and midstory and declined strongly in the canopy. Family and species composition changed significantly among the strata; understory and canopy showed the lowest similarity. Food web analyses further revealed an increasing network specialization towards the canopy, caused by an increase in specialization of the caterpillar community. In summary, our study revealed a pronounced stratification of a temperate forest caterpillar community, unveiling a distinctly different assemblage of caterpillars dwelling in the canopy stratum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Ali JG, Agrawal AA (2012) Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends Plant Sci 17:293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.006

  2. Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Davies SJ, Bennett AC, Gonzalez-Akre EB, Muller-Landau HC, Wright SJ, Abu Salim K, Almeyda Zambrano AM, Alonso A, Baltzer JL, Basset Y, Bourg NA, Broadbent EN, Brockelman WY, Bunyavejchewin S, Burslem DFRP, Butt N, Cao M, Cardenas D, Chuyong GB, Clay K, Cordell S, Dattaraja HS, Deng X, Detto M, Du X, Duque A, Erikson DL, Ewango CEN, Fischer GA, Fletcher C, Foster RB, Giardina CP, Gilbert GS, Gunatilleke N, Gunatilleke S, Hao Z, Hargrove WW, Hart TB, Hau BCH, He F, Hoffman FM, Howe RW, Hubbell SP, Inman-Narahari FM, Jansen PA, Jiang M, Johnson DJ, Kanzaki M, Kassim AR, Kenfack D, Kibet S, Kinnaird MF, Korte L, Kral K, Kumar J, Larson AJ, Li Y, Li X, Liu S, Lum SKY, Lutz JA, Ma K, Maddalena DM, Makana JR, Malhi Y, Marthews T, Mat Serudin R, Mcmahon SM, McShea WJ, Memiaghe HR, Mi X, Mizuno T, Morecroft M, Myers JA, Novotny V, de Oliveira AA, Ong PS, Orwig DA, Ostertag R, den Ouden J, Parker GG, Phillips RP, Sack L, Sainge MN, Sang W, Sri-ngernyuang K, Sukumar R, Sun IF, Sungpalee W, Suresh HS, Tan S, Thomas SC, Thomas DW, Thompson J, Turner BL, Uriarte M, Valencia R, Vallejo MI, Vicentini A, Vrska T, Wang X, Wang X, Weiblen G, Wolf A, Xu H, Yap S, Zimmerman J (2015) CTFS-ForestGEO: a worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change. Glob Chang Biol 21:528–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12712

  3. Ashton LA, Nakamura A, Basset Y, Burwell CJ, Cao M, Eastwood R, Odell E, de Oliveira ED, Hurley K, Katabuchi M, Maunsell S, McBroom J, Schmidl J, Sun Z, Tang Y, Whitaker T, Laidlaw MJ, McDonald WJF, Kitching RL (2016) Vertical stratification of moths across elevation and latitude. J Biogr 43:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12616

  4. Banašek-Richter C, Cattin M-F, Bersier L-F (2004) Sampling effects and the robustness of quantitative and qualitative food-web descriptors. J Theor Biol 226:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00305-9

  5. Barber NA, Marquis RJ (2011) Leaf quality, predators and stochastic processes in the assembly of a diverse herbivore community. Ecology 92:699–708. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0125.1

  6. Basset Y (2001) Invertebrates in the canopy of tropical rain forests - how much do we really know? Plant Ecol 153:87–107. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017581406101

  7. Basset Y, Hammond PM, Barrios H, Holloway JD, Miller SE (2003) Vertical stratification of arthropod assemblages. In: Basset Y, Novotny V, Miller SE, Kitching RL (eds) Arthropods of tropical forests: spatio-temporal dynamics and resource use in the canopy, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 17–27

  8. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

  9. Beccaloni GW (1997) Vertical stratification of ithomiine butterfly (Nymphalidae: Ithomiinae) mimicry complexes: the relationship between adult flight height and larval host–plant height. Biol J Linn Soc 62:313–341. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1997.0165

  10. Beck J, Holloway JD, Schwanghart W (2013) Undersampling and the measurement of beta diversity. Methods Ecol Evol 4:370–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12023

  11. Blüthgen N, Menzel F, Blüthgen N (2006) Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecol 6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-6-9

  12. Brehm G (2007) Contrasting patterns of vertical stratification in two moth families in a Costa Rican lowland rain forest. Basic Appl Ecol 8:44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2006.02.002

  13. Brown JL, Vargo S, Connor EF, Nuckols MS (1997) Causes of vertical stratification in the density of Cameraria hamadryadella. Ecol Entomol 22:16–25. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1997.00046.x

  14. Chaij J, Devoto M, Oleiro M, Chaneton EJ, Mazía N (2016) Complexity of leaf miner–parasitoid food webs declines with canopy height in Patagonian beech forests. Ecol Entomol 41:599–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12332

  15. Chao A, Jost L (2015) Estimating diversity and entropy profiles via discovery rates of new species. Methods Ecol Evol 6:873–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12349

  16. Chao A, Colwell RK, Gotelli NJ, Hsieh TC, Sander EL, Ma KH, Colwell RK, Ellison AM (2014) Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol Monogr 84:45–67. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0133.1

  17. Chen JM, Menges CH, Leblanc SG (2005) Global mapping of foliage clumping index using multi-angular satellite data. Remote Sens Environ 97:447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.003

  18. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0557

  19. De Smedt P, Vangansbeke P, Bracke R, Schauwvliege W, Willems L, Mertens J, Verheyen K (2018) Vertical stratification of moth communities in a deciduous forest in Belgium. Insect Conserv Diver. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12320

  20. Delabye S, Rougerie R, Bayendi S, Andeime-Eyene M, Zakharov EV, deWaard JR, Hebert PDN, Kamgang R, Le Gall P, Lopez-Vaamonde C, Mavoungou J-F, Moussavou G, Moulin N, Oslilsly R, Rahola N, Sebag D, Decaëns T (2018) Characterization and comparison of poorly known moth communities through DNA barcoding in two Afrotropical environments in Gabon. Genome. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2018-0063

  21. DeVries PJ, Walla TR (1999) Species diversity in spatial and temporal dimensions of fruit-feeding butterflies from two Ecuadorian rainforests. Biol J Linn Soc 68:333–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01175.x

  22. Di Giovanni F, Cerretti P, Mason F, Minari E, Marini L (2015) Vertical stratification of ichneumonid wasp communities: the effects of forest structure and life-history traits. Insect Sci 22:688–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12153

  23. Dormann CF, Gruber B, Fründ J (2008) Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News 8(2):8–11

  24. Dormann CF, Fründ J, Blüthgen N, Gruber B (2009) Indices graphs and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. Open Ecol J 2:7–24. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213000902010007

  25. dos Santos JP, Iserhard CA, Carreira JYO, Freitas AVL (2017) Monitoring fruit-feeding butterfly assemblages in two vertical strata in seasonal Atlantic Forest: temporal species turnover is lower in the canopy. J Trop Ecol 33:345–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467417000323

  26. Farkas TE, Singer MS (2013) Can caterpillar density or host-plant quality explain host-plant-related parasitism of a generalist forest caterpillar assemblage? Oecologia 173:971–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2658-z

  27. Fermon H, Waltert M, Vane-Wright RI, Mühlenberg M (2005) Forest use and vertical stratification in fruit-feeding butterflies of Sulawesi, Indonesia: impacts for conservation. Biodivers Conserv 14:333–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-5354-9

  28. Floren A, Schmidl J (2008) Canopy arthropod research in Europe. Basic and applied studies from the high frontier, 1st edn. Bioform Entomology, Nuremberg.

  29. Fordyce JA, DeVries PJ (2016) A tale of two communities: neotropical butterfly assemblages show higher beta diversity in the canopy compared to the understory. Oecologia 181:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3562-0

  30. Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R companion to applied regression, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

  31. Gentry GL, Dyer LA (2002) On the conditional nature of neotropical caterpillar defenses against their natural enemies. Ecology 83:3108–3119. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083%5b3108:OTCNON%5d2.0.CO;2

  32. Graça MB, Pequeno PACL, Franklin E, Morais JW (2017) Coevolution between flight morphology, vertical stratification and sexual dimorphism: what can we learn from tropical butterflies? J Evol Biol 30:1862–1871. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13145

  33. Greeney HF, Dyer LA, Smilanich AM (2012) Feeding by lepidopteran larvae is dangerous: a review of caterpillars’ chemical, physiological, morphological and behavioral defenses against natural enemies. Invert Surv J 9:7–34. http://www.isj.unimo.it/index.php/ISJ/article/view/256

  34. Grimbacher PS, Stork NE (2007) Vertical stratification of feeding guilds and body size in beetle assemblages from an Australian tropical rainforest. Austral Ecol 32:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01735.x

  35. Hacker H, Müller J (2008) Stratification of ‘macro-Lepidoptera’ (Insecta) in northern Bavarian forest stands dominated by different tree species. In: Floren A, Schmidl J (eds) Canopy arthropod research in Europe. Basic and applied studies from the high frontier, 1st edn. Bioform Entomology, Nuremberg, pp 355–382

  36. Hemming JDC, Lindroth RL (1995) Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: effects on performance of gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia 103:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328428

  37. Hirao T, Murakami M, Kashizaki A (2009) Importance of the understory stratum to entomofaunal diversity in a temperate deciduous forest. Ecol Res 24:263–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0502-4

  38. Holmes RT, Schultz JC (1988) Food availability for forest birds: effects of prey distribution and abundance on bird foraging. Can J Zool 66:720–728. https://doi.org/10.1139/z88-107

  39. Hrcek J, Miller SE, Whitfield JB, Shima H, Novotny V (2013) Parasitism rate parasitoid community composition and host specificity on exposed and semi-concealed caterpillars from a tropical rainforest. Oecologia 173:521–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2619-6

  40. Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A (2016) iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol Evol 7:1451–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12613

  41. Hunter AF, Lechowicz MJ (1992) Foliage quality changes during canopy development of some northern hardwood trees. Oecologia 89:316–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317408

  42. Intachat J, Holloway JD (2000) Is there stratification in diversity or preferred flight height of geometroid moths in Malaysian lowland tropical forest? Biodivers Conserv 9:1417–1439. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008926814229

  43. Jordano P (1987) Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance dependence and coevolution. Am Nat 129:657–677. https://doi.org/10.1086/284665

  44. Jost L, Chao A, Chazdon RL (2011) Compositional similarity and ß (beta) diversity. In: Magurran AE, McGill BJ (eds) Biological diversity. Frontiers in measurement and assessment, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 66–84

  45. Kekkonen M, Hebert PDN (2014) DNA barcode-based delineation of putative species: efficient start for taxonomic workflows. Mol Ecol Resour 14:706–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12233

  46. Le Corff J, Marquis RJ (1999) Differences between understory and canopy in herbivore community composition and leaf quality for two oak species in Missouri. Ecol Entomol 24:46–58. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1999.00174.x

  47. Lenth R (2018) Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares Means. R package version 1.2.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans

  48. Levesque-Beaudin V, Rosati ME, Silverson N, Warne CP, Brown A, Telfer AC, Sobel CN, Miskie RN, Miller ME, Sones JE, Miller SE, de Waard JR (2017) Museum harvesting in major natural history collections. Genome 60:962. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2017-0178

  49. Lill JT, Marquis RJ (2001) The effects of leaf quality on herbivore performance and attack from natural enemies. Oecologia 126:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000557

  50. Lowman MD (2009) Canopy research in the twenty-first century: a review of arboreal ecology. Trop Ecol 50:125–136

  51. Maguire DY, Robert K, Brochu K, Larrivée M, Buddle CM, Wheeler TA (2014) Vertical stratification of beetles (Coleoptera) and flies (Diptera) in temperate forest canopies. Environ Entomol 43:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN13056

  52. Menken SBJ, Boomsma JJ, van Nieukerken EJ (2010) Large-scale evolutionary patterns of host plant associations in the Lepidoptera. Evolution 64:1098–1119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00889.x

  53. Mitter C, Davis RD, Cummings MP (2017) Phylogeny and evolution of Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 62:265–283. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035125

  54. Morris RJ, Sinclair FH, Burwell CJ (2015) Food web structure changes with elevation but not rainforest stratum. Ecography 38:792–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01078

  55. Müller J, Stadler J, Jarzabek-Müller A, Hacker H, ter Braak C, Brandl R (2011) The predictability of phytophagous insect communities: host specialists as habitat specialists. PLoS One 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025986

  56. Murakami M, Yoshida K, Hara H (2005) Spatio–temporal variation in Lepidopteran larval assemblages associated with oak Quercus crispula: the importance of leaf quality. Ecol Entomol 30:521–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00724.x

  57. Nakamura A, Kitching RL, Cao M, Creedy TJ, Fayle TM, Freiberg M, Hewitt CN, Itioka T, Koh LP, Ma K, Malhi Y, Mitchell A, Novotny V, Ozanne CMP, Song L, Wang H, Ashton LA (2017) Forests and their canopies: achievements and horizons in canopy science. Trends Ecol Evol 32:438–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.02.020

  58. Nuttle T, Yerger EH, Stoleson SH, Ristau TE (2011) Legacy of top-down herbivore pressure ricochets back up multiple trophic levels in forest canopies over 30 years. Ecosphere 2:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES10-00108.1

  59. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2018) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

  60. Olesen JM, Jordano P (2002) Geographic patterns in plant–pollinator mutualistic networks. Ecology 83:2416–2424. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083%5b2416:GPIPPM%5d2.0.CO;2

  61. Paniagua MR, Medianero E, Lewis OT (2009) Structure and vertical stratification of plant galler-parasitoid food webs in two tropical forests. Ecol Entomol 34:310–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2008.01079.x

  62. Parker GG, Brown MJ (2000) Forest canopy stratification—is it useful? Am Nat 155:473–484. https://doi.org/10.1086/303340

  63. Pellissier L, Fiedler K, Ndribe C, Dubuis A, Pradervand JN, Guisan A, Rasmann S (2012) Shifts in species richness, herbivore specialization, and plant resistance along elevation gradients. Ecol Evol 2:1818–1825. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.296

  64. Pellissier L, Albouy C, Bascompte J, Farwig N, Graham C, Loreau M, Maglianesi MA, Melián CJ, Pitteloud C, Roslin T, Rohr R, Saavedra S, Thuiller W, Woodward G, Zimmermann NE, Gravel D (2018) Comparing species interaction networks along environmental gradients. Biol Rev 93:785–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12366

  65. Pohl GR, Patterson B, Pelham JP (2016) Annotated taxonomic checklist of the Lepidoptera of North America, North of Mexico, 766 pp. Working paper published online by the authors at ResearchGate.net

  66. Powell JA (1980) Evolution of larval food preferences in microlepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 25:133–159. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.25.010180.001025

  67. R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org

  68. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2013) A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the barcode index number (BIN) system. PLoS One 8:e66213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066213

  69. Regier JC, Brown JW, Mitter C, Baixeras J, Cho S, Cummings MP, Zwick A (2012) A molecular phylogeny for the leaf-roller moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and its implications for classification and life history evolution. PLoS One 7:e35574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035574

  70. Regier JC, Mitter C, Kristensen NP, Davis DR, van Nieukerken EJ, Rota J, Simonsen TJ, Mitter KT, Kawahara AY, Yen S-H, Cummings MP, Zwick A (2015) A molecular phylogeny for the oldest (nonditrysian) lineages of extant Lepidoptera with implications for classification, comparative morphology and life-history evolution. Syst Entomol 40:671–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12129

  71. Ribeiro SP, Basset Y (2007) Gall-forming and free-feeding herbivory along vertical gradients in a lowland tropical rainforest: the importance of leaf sclerophylly. Ecography 30:663–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05083.x

  72. Schlick-Steiner BC, Steiner FM, Seifert B, Stauffer C, Christian E, Crozier RH (2010) Integrative taxonomy: a multisource approach to exploring biodiversity. Annu Rev Entomol 55:421–438. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085432

  73. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analyses. Nat Methods 9:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089

  74. Schultz JC, Nothnagle PJ, Baldwin IT (1982) Seasonal and individual variation in leaf quality of two northern hardwoods tree species. Am J Bot 69:753–759. https://doi.org/10.2307/2442965

  75. Schulze CH, Linsenmair KE, Fiedler K (2001) Understorey versus canopy: patterns of vertical stratification and diversity among Lepidoptera in a Bornean rain forest. Plant Ecol 153:133–152. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017589711553

  76. Šigut M, Šigutová H, Šipoš J, Pyszko P, Kotásková N, Drozd P (2018) Vertical canopy gradient shaping the stratification of leafchewer–parasitoid interactions in a temperate forest. Ecol Evol 8:7297–7311. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4194

  77. Stireman JO, Cerretti P, Whitmore D, Hardersen S, Gianelle D (2012) Composition and stratification of a tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) parasitoid community in a European temperate plain forest. Insect Conserv Div 5:346–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00168.x

  78. Summerville KS, Crist TO (2003) Determinants of lepidopteran community composition and species diversity in eastern deciduous forests: roles of season, eco-region and patch size. Oikos 100:134–148. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11992.x

  79. Summerville KS, Crist TO, Kahn JK, Gering JG (2003) Community structure of arboreal caterpillars within and among four tree species of the eastern deciduous forest. Ecol Entomol 28:747–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2003.00561.x

  80. Summerville KS, Ritter LM, Crist TO (2004) Forest moth taxa as indicators of lepidopteran richness and habitat disturbance: a preliminary assessment. Biol Conserv 116:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00168-X

  81. Ulyshen MD (2011) Arthropod vertical stratification in temperate deciduous forests: implications for conservation-oriented management. Forest Ecol Manag 261:1479–1489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.033

  82. van Nieukerken EJ, Kaila L, Kitching IJ, Kristensen NP, Lees DC, Minet J, Mitter C, Mutanen M, Regier JC, Simonsen TJ, Wahlberg N, Yen SH, Zahiri R, Adamski D, Baixeras J, Bartsch D, Bengtsson BA, Brown JW, Bucheli SR, Davis DR, De Prins J, De Prins W, Epstein ME, Gentili-Poole P, Gielis C, Hättenschwiler P, Hausmann A, Holloway JD, Kallies A, Karsholt O, Kawahara AY, Koster S, Kozlov MV, Lafontaine JD, Lamas G, Landry J-F, Lee S, Nuss M, Park KT, Penz C, Rota J, Schintlmeister A, Schmidt BC, Sohn JC, Solis MA, Tarmann GM, Warren AD, Weller S, Yakovlev RV, Zolotuhin VV, Zwick A (2011) Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In Zhang, Z.-Q. (ed.) Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148:212–221. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3148.1.41

  83. Vázquez DP, Melián CJ, Williams NM, Blüthgen N, Krasnov BR, Poulin R (2007) Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. Oikos 116:1120–1127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15828.x

  84. Volf M, Hrcek J, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Novotny V (2015) To each its own: differential response of specialist and generalist herbivores to plant defence in willows. J Anim Ecol 84:1123–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12349

  85. Volf M, Klimeš P, Lamarre GPA, Redmond CM, Seifert CL, Abe T, Auga J, Anderson-Teixeira K, Basset Y, Beckett S, Butterill PT, Drozd P, Gonzalez-Akre E, Kaman O, Kamata N, Laird-Hopkins B, Libra M, Manumbor M, Miller SE, Molem K, Mottl O, Murakami M, Nakaji T, Plowman NS, Pyszko P, Šigut M, Šipoš J, Tropek R, Weiblen GD, Novotny V (2019) Quantitative assessment of plant-arthropod interactions in forest canopies: a plot-based approach. PLoS One 14:e0222119. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222119

  86. Wagner DL (2005) Caterpillars of eastern North America: a guide to identification and natural history, 1st edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  87. Wagner DL, Giles V, Reardon RC, McManus ML (1998) Caterpillars of eastern forests, 1st edn. United States Department of Agriculture, Morgantown

  88. Wagner DL, Ferguson DC, McCabe TL, Reardon RC (2001) Geometroid caterpillars of northeastern and Appalachian forests, 1st edn. United States Department of Agriculture, Morgantown

  89. Wagner DL, Schweitzer DF, Sullivan JB, Reardon RC (2011) Owlet caterpillars of eastern North America, 1st edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  90. Walcroft AS, Brown KJ, Schuster WSF, Tissue DT, Turnbull MH, Griffin KL, Whitehead D (2005) Radiative transfer and carbon assimilation in relation to canopy architecture, foliage area distribution and clumping in a mature temperate rainforest canopy in New Zealand. Agr Forest Meteorol 135:326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.12.010

  91. Wardhaugh CW (2014) The spatial and temporal distributions of arthropods in forest canopies: uniting disparate patterns with hypotheses for specialisation. Biol Rev 89:1021–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12094

  92. Weiss M, Procházka J, Schlaghamerský J, Cizek L (2016) Fine-Scale vertical stratification and guild composition of saproxylic beetles in lowland and montane forests: similar patterns despite low faunal overlap. PLoS One 11:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149506

  93. Wilson JJ (2012) DNA barcodes for insects. In: Kress WJ, Erickson DL (eds) DNA barcodes: methods and protocols. Springer, New York, pp 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_3

  94. Wolda H (1981) Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia 50:296–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344966

  95. Zehnder CB, Stodola KW, Joyce BL, Egetter D, Cooper RJ, Hunter MD (2009) Elevational and seasonal variation in the foliar quality and arthropod community of Acer pensylvanicum. Environ Entomol 38:1161–1167. https://doi.org/10.1603/022.038.0424

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank E.B. Gonzalez-Akre for field assistance, organizational support and leaf area calculations. We further thank the staff, interns, and volunteers of the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (Front Royal, Virginia, USA) and the Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences (České Budějovice, Czech Republic) who helped us during the field work, especially G. Carscallen, M.E. Losada, and G. Nichols for their additional assistance in processing the caterpillar samples. Many thanks to J. Rhodes for facilitating the field work on his property. The Canadian Center for DNA Barcoding, University of Guelph, carried out the COI sequencing and associated bioinfomatics. J. Brown, D. Davis, R. Robbins, and N. Silverson (Smithsonian), P. Goldstein (US Department of Agriculture), and M. Epstein (California Department of Food and Agriculture) provided assistance in identifications. We also thank the anonymous reviewer and the editors for their valuable comments helping to improve the manuscript. This study was funded by the European Research Council (Project No. 669609 to VN). CLS was supported by grant GAJU 038/2019/P provided by University of South Bohemia. GPAL was supported by the Czech funding agency (GACR 19-15645Y). MV was supported by Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (Ref.3.3-CZE-1192673-HFST-P).

Author information

VN, SEM, KJAT, and MV established the project. MV, VN, GPAL, and CLS designed the sampling protocols and the experimental approach. GPAL, CLS, and MV lead the field work. CLS, DLW, SEM, and MV processed the data. CLS and LRJ analysed the data. CLS wrote the first draft of the manuscript; all authors discussed the results and significantly contributed in writing the manuscript.

Correspondence to Carlo L. Seifert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by George Heimpel.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 271 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seifert, C.L., Lamarre, G.P.A., Volf, M. et al. Vertical stratification of a temperate forest caterpillar community in eastern North America. Oecologia 192, 501–514 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04584-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Feeding guilds
  • Food web
  • Forest canopy
  • Lepidoptera
  • Specialization