Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 191, Issue 4, pp 843–859 | Cite as

No evidence for an association between Clock gene allelic variation and migration timing in a long-distance migratory shorebird (Limosa lapponica baueri)

  • Ángela M. Parody-MerinoEmail author
  • Phil F. Battley
  • Jesse R. Conklin
  • Andrew E. Fidler
Behavioral ecology – original research

Abstract

The gene Clock is a key part of the Core Circadian Oscillator, and the length of the polyglutamine (poly-Q) repeat sequence in Clock (ClkpolyQcds) has been proposed to be associated with the timing of annual cycle events in birds. We tested whether variation in ClkpolyQcds corresponds to variation in migration timing in the bar-tailed godwit (Limosa lapponica baueri), a species in which individuals show strong annual consistency in their migration timing despite the New Zealand population migrating across a 5-week period. We describe allelic variation of the ClkpolyQcds in 135 godwits over-wintering in New Zealand (N.Z.) and investigate whether polymorphism in this region is associated with northward migration timing (chronophenotype) from N.Z. or (for 32 birds tracked by geolocator) after the primary stopover in Asia. Six Clock alleles were detected (Q7‒Q12) and there was substantial variation between individuals (heterozygosity of 0.79). There was no association between ClkpolyQcds polymorphism and migration timing from N.Z. The length of the shorter Clock allele was related to migration timing from Asia, though this relationship arose largely from just a few northern-breeding birds with longer alleles. Other studies show no consistent associations between ClkpolyQcds and migration timing in birds, although Clock may be associated with breeding latitude in some species (as an adaptation to photoperiodic regime). Apparent relationships with migration timing could reflect latitude-related variation in migration timing, rather than Clock directly affecting migration timing. On current evidence, ClkpolyQcds is not a strong candidate for driving migration timing in migratory birds generally.

Keywords

Clock Polyglutamine Circannual Phenology Migration Bar-tailed godwit 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Royal Society of New Zealand for the Marsden Fund Grant (MAU1202) that supported this research and to the New Zealand Foundation for Science, Research and Technology for the Postdoctoral Fellowship that supported P.F.B. in the earlier Firth of Thames work (2004–06). We thank David Melville, Adrian Riegen, Rob Schuckard, Murray Potter, and Brett Gartrell for assistance during capture attempts, Peter Langlands, Ian Southey and Thomas Burns for resighting work, numerous volunteers who helped during captures, and Yvonne Verkuil for useful discussion and comments on drafts.

Author contribution statement

Fieldwork was done principally by PFB (bird capture efforts at all sites and monitoring in the Firth of Thames from 2004–06) and JRC (captures and departure monitoring at the Manawatu River estuary). APM was responsible for microsatellite data generation in the lab, subsequent analyses and writing the manuscript. AEF guided and supervised the laboratory work and AEF and PFB gave input to data analyses. All authors contributed to drafting of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Royal Society of New Zealand for the Marsden Fund grant (MAU1202).

Supplementary material

442_2019_4524_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (395 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 394 kb)
442_2019_4524_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (118 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 118 kb)
442_2019_4524_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (179 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 179 kb)
442_2019_4524_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (332 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 331 kb)

References

  1. Albrecht U (2012) Timing to perfection: the biology of central and peripheral circadian clocks. Neuron 74:246–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baerwald MR et al (2016) Migration-related phenotypic divergence is associated with epigenetic modifications in rainbow trout. Mol Ecol 25:1785–1800.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13231 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:48.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battley PF (2006) Consistent annual schedules in a migratory shorebird. Biol Lett 2:517–520.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0535 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Battley PF, Conklin JR (2017) Geolocator wetness data accurately detect periods of migratory flight in two species of shorebird. Wader Study 124:112–119.  https://doi.org/10.18194/ws.00068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battley PF et al (2012) Contrasting extreme long-distance migration patterns in bar-tailed godwits Limosa lapponica. J Avian Biol 43:21–32.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048x.2011.05473.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauer S, Gienapp P, Madsen J (2008) The relevance of environmental conditions for departure decision changes en route in migrating geese. Ecology 89:1953–1960.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1101.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bazzi G et al (2015) Clock gene polymorphism and scheduling of migration: a geolocator study of the barn swallow Hirundo rustica. Sci Rep 5:12443.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12443 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bazzi G et al (2016a) Clock gene polymorphism, migratory behaviour and geographic distribution: a comparative study of trans-Saharan migratory birds. Mol Ecol 25:6077–6091.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13913 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bazzi G et al (2016b) Adcyap1 polymorphism covaries with breeding latitude in a Nearctic migratory songbird, the wilson’s warbler (Cardellina pusilla). Ecol Evol 6:3226–3239.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2053 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bazzi G et al (2017) Candidate genes have sex-specific effects on timing of spring migration and moult speed in a long-distance migratory bird. Curr Zool 63:479–486.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zow103 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell-Pedersen D et al (2005) Circadian rhythms from multiple oscillators: lessons from diverse organisms. Nat Rev Genet 6:544–556.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1633 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Berthold P (2001) Bird migration: a general survey, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, c2001, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Berthold P, Querner U (1981) Genetic basis of migratory behavior in European warblers. Science 212:77–79.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.212.4490.77 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Both C, Bouwhuis S, Lessells CM, Visser ME (2006) Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird. Nature 441:81–83.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04539 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Both C, Van Turnhout CAM, Bijlsma RG, Siepel H, Van Strien AJ, Foppen RPB (2010) Avian population consequences of climate change are most severe for long-distance migrants in seasonal habitats. Proc Biol Sci 277:1259–1266.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1525 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bourret A, Garant D (2015) Candidate gene–environment interactions and their relationships with timing of breeding in a wild bird population. Ecol Evol 5:3628–3641.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1630 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Briedis M et al (2016) Breeding latitude leads to different temporal but not spatial organization of the annual cycle in a long-distance migrant. J Avian Biol 47:743–748.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brownstein MJ, Carpten JD, Smith JR (1996) Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. Biotechniques 20(1004–1006):1008–1010Google Scholar
  20. Caprioli M et al (2012) Clock gene variation is associated with breeding phenology and maybe under directional selection in the migratory barn swallow. PLoS One 7:e35140.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035140 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Cassone VM (2014) Avian circadian organization: a chorus of clocks. Front Neuroendocrinol 35:76–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.10.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chakarov N, Jonker R, Boerner M, Hoffman J, Kruger O (2013) Variation at phenological candidate genes correlates with timing of dispersal and plumage morph in a sedentary bird of prey. Mol Ecol 22:5430–5440.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12493 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chong NW, Bernard M, Klein DC (2000) Characterization of the chicken serotonin N-acetyltransferase gene—activation via clock gene heterodimer/e box interaction. J Biol Chem 275:32991–32998.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m005671200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Conklin JR (2011) Extreme migration and the annual cycle: individual strategies in New Zealand bar-tailed godwits. PhD thesis, Massey University, Palmerston NorthGoogle Scholar
  25. Conklin JR, Battley PF (2011) Impacts of wind on individual migration schedules of New Zealand bar-tailed godwits. Behav Ecol 22:854–861.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Conklin JR, Battley PF (2012) Carry-over effects and compensation: late arrival on non-breeding grounds affects wing moult but not plumage or schedules of departing bar-tailed godwits Limosa lapponica baueri. J Avian Biol 43:252–263.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048x.2012.05606.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Conklin JR, Battley PF, Potter MA, Fox JW (2010) Breeding latitude drives individual schedules in a trans-hemispheric migrant bird. Nat Commun 1:67.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1072 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Conklin JR, Battley PF, Potter MA, Ruthrauff DR (2011) Geographic variation in morphology of Alaskan-breeding bar-tailed godwits (Limosa lapponica) is not maintained on their nonbreeding grounds in New Zealand. Auk 128:363–373.  https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2011.10231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Conklin JR, Battley PF, Potter MA (2013) Absolute consistency: individual versus population variation in annual-cycle schedules of a long-distance migrant bird. PLoS One 8:e54535.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054535 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Contina A, Bridge ES, Ross JD, Shipley JR, Kelly JF (2018) Examination of Clock and Adcyap1 gene variation in a neotropical migratory passerine. PLoS One 13:e0190859.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190859 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Costa R, Peixoto AA, Barbujani G, Kyriacou CP (1992) A latitudinal cline in a Drosophila Clock gene. Proc Biol Sci 250:43–49.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1992.0128 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Crews D (2011) Epigenetic modifications of brain and behavior: theory and practice. Horm Behav 59:393–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.07.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Darlington TK et al (1998) Closing the circadian loop: CLOCK-induced transcription of its own inhibitors per and tim. Science 280:1599–1603.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5369.1599 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dor R et al (2011a) Clock gene variation in Tachycineta swallows. Ecol Evol 2:95–105.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dor R et al (2011b) Low variation in the polymorphic Clock gene poly-Q region despite population genetic structure across barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) populations. PLoS One 6:e28843.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028843 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Drent R, Both C, Green M, Madsen J, Piersma T (2003) Pay-offs and penalties of competing migratory schedules. Oikos 103:274–292.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12274.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Easton A, Arbuzova J, Turek FW (2003) The circadian Clock mutation increases exploratory activity and escape-seeking behavior. Genes Brain Behav 2:11–19.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-183x.2003.00002.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ellegren H, Parsch J (2007) The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 8:689–698.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2167 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Evans JA, Leise TL, Castanon-Cervantes O, Davidson AJ (2015) Neural correlates of individual differences in circadian behaviour. Proc Biol Sci 282:20150769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Evens R, Beenaerts N, Witters N, Artois T (2017) Repeated migration of a juvenile European nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus. J Ornithol 158:881–886.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-017-1459-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform 1:47–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fidler AE, van Oers K, Drent PJ, Kuhn S, Mueller JC, Kempenaers B (2007) Drd4 gene polymorphisms are associated with personality variation in a passerine bird. Proc Biol Sci 274:1685–1691.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0337 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Fox JW (2010) Geolocator manual. Version 8. British Antartic Survey. United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  44. Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H (1999) A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30:116–121.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3677252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gekakis N, Staknis D, Nguyen HB, Davis FC, Wilsbacher LD, King DP (1998) Role of the CLOCK protein in the mammalian circadian mechanism. Science 280:1564–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gemayel R et al (2015) Variable glutamine-rich repeats modulate transcription factor activity. Mol Cell 59:615–627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Gill RE Jr et al (2009) Extreme endurance flights by landbirds crossing the Pacific Ocean: ecological corridor rather than barrier? Proc Biol Sci 276:447–458.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1142 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hands S, Sinadinos C, Wyttenbach A (2008) Polyglutamine gene function and dysfunction in the ageing brain. Biochim Biophys Acta 1779:507–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2008.05.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Hardin PE (2005) The circadian timekeeping system of Drosophila. Curr Biol 15:R714–R722.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hastings MH (2000) Circadian clockwork: two loops are better than one. Nat Rev Neurosci 1:143–146.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35039080 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Helfer G, Fidler AE, Vallone D, Foulkes NS, Brandstaetter R (2006) Molecular analysis of clock gene expression in the avian brain. Chronobiol Int 23:113–127.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520500521871 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Helm B, Schwabl I, Gwinner E (2009) Circannual basis of geographically distinct bird schedules. J Exp Biol 212:1259–1269.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.025411 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Helm B et al (2013) Annual rhythms that underlie phenology: biological time-keeping meets environmental change. Proc Biol Sci 280:20130016.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.0016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Hess JE, Zendt JS, Matala AR, Narum SR (2016) Genetic basis of adult migration timing in anadromous steelhead discovered through multivariate association testing. Proc Biol Sci 283:20153064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hurley JM, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC (2016) Circadian oscillators: around the transcription–translation feedback loop and on to output. Trends Biochem Sci 41:834–846.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2016.07.009 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Jenni L, Kery M (2003) Timing of autumn bird migration under climate change: advances in long-distance migrants, delays in short-distance migrants. Proc Biol Sci 270:1467–1471.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2394 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Johnsen A et al (2007) Avian Clock gene polymorphism: evidence for a latitudinal cline in allele frequencies. Mol Ecol 16:4867–4880.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03552.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. King DP et al (1997) Positional cloning of the mouse circadian clock gene. Cell 89:641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kissner KJ, Weatherhead PJ, Francis CM (2003) Sexual size dimorphism and timing of spring migration in birds. J Evol Biol 16:154–162.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00479.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Kölzsch A et al (2015) Forecasting spring from afar? Timing of migration and predictability of phenology along different migration routes of an avian herbivore. J Anim Ecol 84:272–283.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12281 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Korsten P et al (2010) Association between DRD4 gene polymorphism and personality variation in great tits: a test across four wild populations. Mol Ecol 19:832–843.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04518.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Kuhn K et al (2013) Differentiation in neutral genes and a candidate gene in the pied flycatcher: using biological archives to track global climate change. Ecol and Evol 3:4799–4814.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.855 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Leder EH, Danzmann RG, Ferguson MM (2006) The candidate gene, Clock, localizes to a strong spawning time quantitative trait locus region in rainbow trout. J Hered 97:74–80.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esj004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Liedvogel M, Lundberg M (2014) The genetics of migration. In: Hansson LA, Akesson S (eds) Animal movements across scales. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Liedvogel M, Sheldon BC (2010) Low variability and absence of phenotypic correlates of Clock gene variation in a great tit Parus major population. J Avian Biol 41:543–550.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048x.2010.05055.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Liedvogel M, Szulkin M, Knowles SCL, Wood MJ, Sheldon BC (2009) Phenotypic correlates of Clock gene variation in a wild blue tit population: evidence for a role in seasonal timing of reproduction. Mol Ecol 18:2444–2456.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04204.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Lisovski S (2018) Light-level geolocation in polar regions with 24-hour daylight. Wader Study 125:129–134.  https://doi.org/10.18194/ws.00109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lisovski S, Hahn S (2012) GeoLight – processing and analysing light-based geolocator data in R. Methods Ecol Evol 3:1055–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00248.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Majumdar G, Trivedi AK, Gupta NJ, Kumar V (2015) Circadian synchronization determines critical day length for seasonal responses. Physiol Behav 147:282–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Marra PP, Francis CM, Mulvihill RS, Moore FR (2005) The influence of climate on the timing and rate of spring bird migration. Oecologia 142:307–315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1725-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Meltofte H, Piersma T, Boyd H, McCaffery BJ, Tulp IYM (2007) Effects of climate variation on the breeding ecology of Arctic shorebirds. Meddelelser om Groenland, Bioscience 59:1–48Google Scholar
  72. Mueller JC, Partecke J, Hatchwell BJ, Gaston KJ, Evans KL (2013) Candidate gene polymorphisms for behavioural adaptations during urbanization in blackbirds. Mol Ecol 22:3629–3637.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12288 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  74. Nei M, Roychoudhury AK (1974) Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics 76:379–390PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Nussey DH, Wilson AJ, Brommer JE (2007) The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. J Evol Biol 20:831–844.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01300.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. O’Malley KG, Banks MA (2008) A latitudinal cline in the Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Clock gene: evidence for selection on PolyQ length variants. Proc Biol Sci 275:2813–2821.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0524 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Panda S, Hogenesch JB, Kay SA (2002) Circadian rhythms from flies to human. Nature 417:329–335.  https://doi.org/10.1038/417329a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Pedersen L, Jackson K, Thorup K, Tøttrup AP (2018) Full-year tracking suggests endogenous control of migration timing in a long-distance migratory songbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72:139.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2553-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Peterson MP, Abolins-Abols M, Atwell JW, Rice RJ, Mila B, Ketterson ED (2015) Variation in candidate genes CLOCK and ADCYAP1 does not consistently predict differences in migratory behavior in the songbird genus Junco. F1000Res 2:2–115Google Scholar
  81. Powledge TM (2011) Behavioral epigenetics: how nurture shapes nature. Bioscience 61:588–592.  https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.8.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pulido F, Berthold P (2003) Quantitative genetic analysis of migratory behaviour. In: Berthold P, Gwinner E, Sonnenschein E (eds) Avian Migration. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rani S, Kumar V (2013) Avian circannual systems: persistence and sex differences. Gen Comp Endocrinol 190:61–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.04.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Reischl S, Kramer A (2011) Kinases and phosphatases in the mammalian circadian clock. FEBS Lett 585:1393–1399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.02.038 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Resuehr D, Wildemann U, Sikes H, Olcese J (2007) E-box regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor expression in immortalized gonadotrope cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 278:36–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2007.08.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Rey G, Cesbron F, Rougemont J, Reinke H, Brunner M, Naef F (2011) Genome-wide and phase-specific DNA-binding rhythms of BMAL1 control circadian output functions in mouse liver. PLoS Biol 9:e1000595.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000595 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Ripperger JA, Shearman LP, Reppert SM, Schibler U (2000) CLOCK, an essential pacemaker component, controls expression of the circadian transcription factor DBP. Genes Dev 14:679–689PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/
  89. Saino N et al (2013) Timing of molt of barn swallows is delayed in a rare Clock genotype. Peerj 1:e17.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Saino N et al (2015) Polymorphism at the Clock gene predicts phenology of long-distance migration in birds. Mol Ecol 24:1758–1773.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13159 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Saino N et al (2017) Migration phenology and breeding success are predicted by methylation of a photoperiodic gene in the barn swallow. Sci Rep 7:45412.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45412 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Saleem Q, Anand A, Jain S, Brahmachari SK (2001) The polyglutamine motif is highly conserved at the Clock locus in various organisms and is not polymorphic in humans. Hum Genet 109:136–142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004390100550 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234.  https://doi.org/10.1038/72708 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Sergio F et al (2014) Individual improvements and selective mortality shape lifelong migratory performance. Nature 515:410.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13696 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can J Zool 69:82–90.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z91-013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sokolovskis K et al (2019) Phenotypic and genetic characterization of the East Siberian Willow Warbler (Phylloscopus trochilus yakutensis Ticehurst, 1935) in relation to the European subspecies. J Ornithol 160:721–731.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-019-01653-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Spottiswoode C, Saino N (2010) Sexual selection and climate change. In: Møller AP, Fiedler W, Berthold P (eds) Oxford University Press. OUP Oxford, pp 169-189Google Scholar
  98. Stuber EF, Baumgartner C, Dingemanse NJ, Kempenaers B, Mueller JC (2016) Genetic correlates of individual differences in sleep behavior of free-living great tits (Parus major). G3 Genes Genomes Genet 6:599–607.  https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.024216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sutton JT, Robertson BC, Jamieson IG (2011) Dye shift: a neglected source of genotyping error in molecular ecology. Mol Ecol Resour 11:514–520.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.02981.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Tøttrup AP et al (2012) The annual cycle of a trans-equatorial Eurasian-African passerine migrant: different spatio-temporal strategies for autumn and spring migration. Proc Biol Sci 279:1008–1016.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1323 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Tschirren B, Bensch S (2010) Genetics of personalities: no simple answers for complex traits. Mol Ecol 19:624–626.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04519.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Tsutsui K, Ubuka T (2018) How to contribute to the progress of neuroendocrinology: discovery of GnIH and progress of GnIH research. Front Endocrinol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Visser ME et al (2015) Effects of spring temperatures on the strength of selection on timing of reproduction in a long-distance migratory bird. PLoS Biol 13:e1002120–e1002120.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002120 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. Wetzel DP, Hatch MI, Westneat DF (2015) Genetic sources of individual variation in parental care behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1933–1943.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2006-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Yoshitane H, Fukada Y (2009) CIPC-dependent phosphorylation of CLOCK and NPAS2 in circadian clockwork. Sleep Biol Rhythms 7:226–234.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8425.2009.00411.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zhang EE, Kay SA (2010) Clocks not winding down: unravelling circadian networks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:764–776.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2995 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Zhang S, Xu X, Wang W, Yang W, Liang W (2017) Clock gene is associated with individual variation in the activation of reproductive endocrine and behavior of Asian short toed lark. Sci Rep 7:15002.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15064-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wildlife and Ecology Group, School of Agriculture and EnvironmentMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  2. 2.Conservation Ecology GroupUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Institute of Marine ScienceUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations