Spatial distribution of damage affects the healing, growth, and morphology of coral
Many predators and herbivores do not kill their prey, but rather remove or damage tissue. Prey are often able to heal or regenerate this lost tissue. If the prey are modular organisms (e.g., some plants and cnidarians), regeneration is frequently influenced by other modules interconnected to damaged ones. For example, many coral predators remove tissue from colonies consisting of many polyps, and these polyps often share resources with their neighbors. Thus, the distribution of tissue loss on a coral colony could affect the coral’s response. I hypothesized that spatially aggregated damage might be slow to heal due to competing demands on nearby polyps. To explore the spatial patterns of corallivory and their implications, I conducted: (1) field surveys documenting the spatial distribution of lesions on corals; (2) field experiments testing the effect of the distance between lesions on coral tissue healing, skeletal growth, and morphology; and (3) field surveys relating corallivore presence to coral growth and morphology. In the field surveys, lesions were aggregated at multiple spatial scales, and most lesions had other lesions within 2 cm. When lesions were near one another, coral tissue regeneration was depressed, although there was no effect on whole colony growth. After a year, however, linear extension was lower in the neighborhood of the lesions. Additionally, gastropod corallivores (Coralliophila violacea) with low movement decreased coral growth and increased coral topographical complexity. These results suggest that corallivores that create clusters of coral damage have a greater effect on coral growth and recovery from damage than corallivores that spread damage throughout the colony.
KeywordsCoral damage Coralliophila violacea Massive Porites Spatial distributions
I thank Alissa Rubin, Luc Overholt, and Carly Roeser for assistance with image analysis, the Osenberg lab and Caitlin Cameron for helpful discussions, and Angela Mulligan, Julie Zill, and Morgan Farrell for field assistance. This work was supported by NSF grant OCE-1130359 and is a contribution from UC Berkeley’s Richard B. Gump South Pacific Research Station.
Author contribution statement
EAH conceived, designed, and executed this study and wrote the manuscript. No other person is entitled to authorship.
This study was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF Grant OCE-1130359)
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
- Bak RPM, Steward-Van Es Y (1980) Regeneration of superficial damage in the Scleractinian Corals Agaricia Agaricites F. Purpurea and Porites Astreoides. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/umrsmas/bullmar/1980/00000030/00000004/art00010
- Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 1(1):2015Google Scholar
- D’Angelo C, Smith EG, Oswald F et al (2012) Locally accelerated growth is part of the innate immune response and repair mechanisms in reef-building corals as detected by green fluorescent protein (GFP)-like pigments. Coral Reefs 31:1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-012-0926-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kallimanis AS, Kunin WE, Halley JM, Sgardelis SP (2005) Metapopulation extinction risk under spatially autocorrelated disturbance. In: conservation biology. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00418.x. Accessed 3 Jul 2019
- Mascarelli PE, Bunkley-Williams L (1999) An experimental field evaluation of healing in damaged, unbleached and artificially bleached star coral, Montastraea annularis. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/umrsmas/bullmar/1999/00000065/00000002/art00019. Accessed 7 Jul 2019
- Meesters EH, Bos A, Gast GJ (1992) Effects of sedimentation and lesion position on coral tissue regeneration. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Coral Reef Symposium pp 681–688Google Scholar
- White J (1979) The plant as a metapopulation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:109–145. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.000545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar