Advertisement

Oecologia

pp 1–14 | Cite as

The effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on plant functional traits and functional diversity: what do we know so far?

  • Jenny ZambranoEmail author
  • Carol X. Garzon-Lopez
  • Lauren Yeager
  • Claire Fortunel
  • Norbert J. Cordeiro
  • Noelle G. Beckman
Concepts, Reviews and Syntheses
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Habitat loss and fragmentation result in significant landscape changes that ultimately affect plant diversity and add uncertainty to how natural areas will respond to future global change. This uncertainty is important given that the loss of biodiversity often includes losing key ecosystem functions. Few studies have explored the effects of landscape changes on plant functional diversity and evidence so far has shown far more pervasive effects than previously reported by species richness and composition studies. Here we present a review on the impact of habitat loss and fragmentation on (1) individual functional traits—related to persistence, dispersal and establishment—and (2) functional diversity. We also discuss current knowledge gaps and propose ways forward. From the literature review we found that studies have largely focused on dispersal traits, strongly impacted by habitat loss and fragmentation, while traits related to persistence were the least studied. Furthermore, most studies did not distinguish habitat loss from spatial fragmentation and were conducted at the plot or fragment-level, which taken together limits the ability to generalize the scale-dependency of landscape changes on plant functional diversity. For future work, we recommend (1) clearly distinguishing the effects of habitat loss from those of fragmentation, and (2) recognizing the scale-dependency of predicted responses when functional diversity varies in time and space. We conclude that a clear understanding of the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on functional diversity will improve predictions of the resiliency and resistance of plant communities to varying scales of disturbance.

Keywords

Alpha diversity Beta diversity Functional traits Functional homogenization Plant communities 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Nathan Swenson and Ellen Damschen for helpful feedback on the manuscript. JZ and NGB were supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center under the US National Science Foundation Grant DBI-1052875. CF benefited from an “Investissements d’Avenir” grant managed by Agence Nationale de la Recherche (CEBA, ref. ANR-10-LABX-25-01). LY acknowledges support from US National Science Foundation Grant OCE-1661683.

Author contribution statement

JZ conceived the idea. JZ and NGB wrote the manuscript. All authors provided feedback and contributed to writing. The co-author list was ordered to reflect primary contributions from JZ and NGB and by the rest of the co-authors in sequence of their contributions to the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

442_2019_4505_MOESM1_ESM.docx (202 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 202 kb)

References

  1. Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA (2006) Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 9:968–980.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilar R, Quesada M, Ashworth L et al (2008) Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Mol Ecol 17:5177–5188.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03971.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold SJ (1983) Morphology, performance and fitness. Am Zool 23:347–361.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/23.2.347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Rös M, Escobar F et al (2013) Plant β-diversity in fragmented rain forests: testing floristic homogenization and differentiation hypotheses. J Ecol 101:1449–1458.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asner GP, Knapp DE, Kennedy-Bowdoin T et al (2008) Invasive species detection in Hawaiian rainforests using airborne imaging spectroscopy and LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ 112:1942–1955.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asner GP, Martin RE, Knapp DE et al (2011) Spectroscopy of canopy chemicals in humid tropical forests. Remote Sens Environ 115:3587–3598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Auffret AG, Plue J, Cousins SAO (2015) The spatial and temporal components of functional connectivity in fragmented landscapes. Ambio.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0588-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Bacles CFE, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA (2006) Effective seed dispersal across a fragmented landscape. Science.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121543 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Baldeck CA, Asner GP, Martin RE et al (2015) Operational tree species mapping in a diverse tropical forest with airborne imaging spectroscopy. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118403 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Ball A, Sanchez-Azofeifa A, Portillo-Quintero C et al (2015) Patterns of leaf biochemical and structural properties of Cerrado life forms: implications for remote sensing. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117659 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Barton PS, Cunningham SA, Manning AD et al (2013) The spatial scaling of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22(6):639–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bazzaz FA (1979) The physiological ecology of plant succession. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:351–371.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.002031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bazzaz F, Pickett STA (1980) Physiological ecology of tropical succession: a comparative review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:287–310.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Benchimol M, Peres CA (2015) Edge-mediated compositional and functional decay of tree assemblages in Amazonian forest islands after 26 years of isolation. J Ecol 103:408–420.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benítez-Malvido J, Lemus-Albor A (2005) The seedling community of tropical rain forest edges and its interaction with herbivores and pathogens. Biotropica.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00031.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Biswas S, Mallik A (2010) Disturbance effects on species diversity and functional diversity in riparian and upland plant communities. Ecology 91:28–35.  https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0887.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bittencourt JVM, Sebbenn AM (2007) Patterns of pollen and seed dispersal in a small, fragmented population of the wind-pollinated tree Araucaria angustifolia in southern Brazil. Heredity (Edinb).  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6801019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bolnick DI (2001) Intraspecific competition favours niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 410:463–466.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35068555 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bullock JM, White SM, Prudhomme C et al (2012) Modelling spread of British wind-dispersed plants under future wind speeds in a changing climate. J Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01910.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N (2011) Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J Appl Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cagnolo L, Cabido M, Valladares G (2006) Plant species richness in the Chaco Serrano Woodland from central Argentina: ecological traits and habitat fragmentation effects. Biol Conserv 132:510–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A et al (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Carreño-Rocabado G, Peña-Claros M, Bongers F et al (2012) Effects of disturbance intensity on species and functional diversity in a tropical forest. J Ecol 100:1453–1463.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02015.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S et al (2009) Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol Lett 12:351–366.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Clarke PJ, Lawes MJ, Midgley JJ et al (2013) Resprouting as a key functional trait: how buds, protection and resources drive persistence after fire. New Phytol 197:19–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cordeiro NJ, Ndangalasi HJ, McEntee JP, Howe HF (2009) Disperser limitation and recruitment of an endemic African tree in a fragmented landscape. Ecology 90:1030–1041.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1208.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cousins SAO, Ohlson H, Eriksson O (2007) Effects of historical and present fragmentation on plant species diversity in semi-natural grasslands in Swedish rural landscapes. Landsc Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9067-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cramer JM, Mesquita RCG, Bruce Williamson G (2007) Forest fragmentation differentially affects seed dispersal of large and small-seeded tropical trees. Biol Conserv 137:415–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Damschen EI, Brudvig LA, Haddad NM et al (2008) The movement ecology and dynamics of plant communities in fragmented landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802037105 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Davies AB, Asner GP (2014) Advances in animal ecology from 3D-LiDAR ecosystem mapping. Trends Ecol Evol 29:681–691.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. de Bello F, Lavorel S, Lavergne S et al (2013) Hierarchical effects of environmental filters on the functional structure of plant communities: a case study in the French Alps. Ecography (Cop) 36:393–402.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07438.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. de Casenave JL, Pelotto JP, Protomastro J (1995) Edge-interior differences in vegetation structure and composition in a Chaco semi-arid forest, Argentina. For Ecol Manage 72:61–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)03444-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Díaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la différence: Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Didham RK, Kapos V, Ewers RM (2012) Rethinking the conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research. Oikos 121:161–170.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20273.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dirzo R, Mendoza E, Ortíz P (2007) Size-related differential seed predation in a heavily defaunated neotropical rain forest. Biotropica 39:355–362.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00274.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dupré C, Ehrlén J (2002) Habitat configuration, species traits and plant distributions. J Ecol 90:796–805.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00717.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Endels P, Adriaens D, Bekker RM et al (2007) Groupings of life-history traits are associated with distribution of forest plant species in a fragmented landscape. J Veg Sci 18:499.  https://doi.org/10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18%5b499:goltaa%5d2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Evju M, Sverdrup-Thygeson A (2016) Spatial configuration matters: a test of the habitat amount hypothesis for plants in calcareous grasslands. Landsc Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0405-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 81:117–142.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006949 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fahrig L (2017) Ecological Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Per Se. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-022612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fahrig L, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Bennett JR et al (2019) Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity?. Biol, ConservCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Feret JB, François C, Asner GP et al (2008) PROSPECT-4 and 5: Advances in the leaf optical properties model separating photosynthetic pigments. Remote Sens Environ 112:3030–3043.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fleishman E, Mac Nally R (2006) Patterns of spatial autocorrelation of assemblages of birds, floristics, physiognomy, and primary productivity in the central Great Basin, USA. Divers Distrib 12:236–243.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00240.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fletcher RJ, Didham RK, Banks-Leite C et al (2018) Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity? Biol Conserv 226:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Garzon-Lopez CX, Bohlman SA, Olff H, Jansen PA (2013) Mapping tropical forest trees using high-resolution aerial digital photographs. Biotropica 45:308–316.  https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gerisch M, Agostinelli V, Henle K, Dziock F (2012) More species, but all do the same: Contrasting effects of flood disturbance on ground beetle functional and species diversity. Oikos 121:508–515.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19749.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Girão LC, Lopes AV, Tabarelli M, Bruna EM (2007) Changes in tree reproductive traits reduce functional diversity in a fragmented Atlantic forest landscape. PLoS One 2:e908.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000908 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Grashof-Bokdam C (1997) Forest species in an agricultural landscape in the Netherlands: Effects of habitat fragmentation. J Veg Sci.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3237238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Grime JP (2006) Trait convergence and trait divergence in herbaceous plant communities: Mechanisms and consequences. J Veg Sci 17:255–260.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02444.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J et al (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052–e1500052.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Haddad NM, Holt RD, Fletcher RJ et al (2017) Connecting models, data, and concepts to understand fragmentation's ecosystem-wide effects. Ecography 40:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harvey E, Gounand I, Ward CL, Altermatt F (2017) Bridging ecology and conservation: from ecological networks to ecosystem function. J Appl Ecol 54:371–379.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12769 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hatfield JH, Harrison MLK, Banks-Leite C (2018) Functional diversity metrics: how they are affected by landscape change and how they represent ecosystem functioning in the tropics. Curr Landsc Ecol Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-018-0032-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Herault B, Honnay O (2005) The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors determining the distribution of plants in fragmented riverine forests: an emergent group approach. J Biogeogr 32:2069–2081.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01351.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Homolová L, Malenovský Z, Clevers JGPW et al (2013) Review of optical-based remote sensing for plant trait mapping. Ecol Complex 15:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography (MPB-32). Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  58. Ibáñez I, Katz DSW, Peltier D et al (2014) Assessing the integrated effects of landscape fragmentation on plants and plant communities: the challenge of multiprocess-multiresponse dynamics. J Ecol 102:882–895.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Janečková P, Janeček Š, Klimešová J et al (2017) The plant functional traits that explain species occurrence across fragmented grasslands differ according to patch management, isolation, and wetness. Landscape Ecol 32:791–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kimberley A, Alan Blackburn G, Duncan Whyatt J, Smart SM (2014) Traits of plant communities in fragmented forests: the relative influence of habitat spatial configuration and local abiotic conditions. J Ecol 102:632–640.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. King AJ, Melbourne BA, Davies KF et al (2018) Spatial and temporal variability of fragmentation effects in a long term, eucalypt forest fragmentation experiment. Landsc Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0623-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kolb A, Diekmann M (2005) Effects of life-history traits on responses of plant species to forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol 19:929–938.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00065.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Laurance WF (2008) Theory meets reality: how habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory. Biol Conserv 141:1731–1744.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Laurance WF, Ferreira LV, Rankin-de Merona JM, Laurance SG (1998) Rain forest fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities. Ecology.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079%5b2032:rffatd%5d2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Laurance WF, Nascimento HEM, Laurance SG et al (2006a) Rapid decay of tree-community composition in Amazonian forest fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:19010–19014.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609048103 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Laurance WF, Nascimento HEM, Laurance SG et al (2006b) Rain forest fragmentation and the proliferation of successional trees. Ecology 87:469–482.  https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0064 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Laurance WF, Nascimento HEM, Laurance SG et al (2007) Habitat fragmentation, variable edge effects, and the landscape-divergence hypothesis. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Laurance WF, Camargo JLC, Luizão RCC et al (2011) The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: a 32-year investigation. Biol Conserv 144:56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Laurance WF, Camargo JLC, Fearnside PM et al (2018) An Amazonian rainforest and its fragments as a laboratory of global change. Biol Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12343 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Lausch A, Erasmi S, King D et al (2016) Understanding forest health with remote sensing-part I—a review of spectral traits, processes and remote-sensing characteristics. Remote Sens 8:1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N et al (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett, LettGoogle Scholar
  72. Lindborg R, Helm A, Bommarco R et al (2012) Effect of habitat area and isolation on plant trait distribution in European forests and grasslands. Ecography (Cop) 35:356–363.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07286.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lobo D, Leao T, MFP L et al (2011) Forest fragmentation drives Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil to biotic homogenization. Divers Distrib 17:287–296.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00739.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lomolino MV (2000) Ecology’s most general, yet protean pattern: the species-area relationship. J Biogeogr 27:17–26.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00377.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lopes AV, Girão LC, Santos BA et al (2009) Long-term erosion of tree reproductive trait diversity in edge-dominated Atlantic forest fragments. Biol Conserv 142:1154–1165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (2001) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 80(294):804–808.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Magnago LFS, Edwards DP, Edwards FA et al (2014) Functional attributes change but functional richness is unchanged after fragmentation of Brazilian Atlantic forests. J Ecol 102:475–485.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Marini L, Bruun HH, Heikkinen RK et al (2012) Traits related to species persistence and dispersal explain changes in plant communities subjected to habitat loss. Divers Distrib 18:898–908.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00893.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111:112–118.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13886.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. May F, Giladi I, Ristow M et al (2013) Plant functional traits and community assembly along interacting gradients of productivity and fragmentation. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2013.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. McManus KM, Asner GP, Martin RE et al (2016) Phylogenetic structure of foliar spectral traits in tropical forest canopies. Remote Sens.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8030196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Melo FPL, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Fahrig L et al (2013) On the hope for biodiversity-friendly tropical landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Michalski F, Nishi I, Peres CA (2007) Disturbance-mediated drift in tree functional groups in Amazonian forest fragments. Biotropica 39:691–701.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00318.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mouillot D, Bellwood DR, Baraloto C et al (2013) Rare species support vulnerable functions in high-diversity ecosystems. PLoS Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001569 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Munguía-Rosas MA, Jurado-Dzib SG, Mezeta-Cob CR et al (2014) Continuous forest has greater taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic plant diversity than an adjacent naturally fragmented forest. J Trop Ecol 30:323–333.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467414000194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Murphy PG, Lugo AE (1986) Ecology of tropical dry forest. Annu Rev Ecol Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.000435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Murray NJ, Keith DA, Bland LM et al (2018) The role of satellite remote sensing in structured ecosystem risk assessments. Sci Total Environ 619:249–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Nathan R, Horvitz N, He Y et al (2011) Spread of North American wind-dispersed trees in future environments. Ecol Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01573.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Nichols E, Peres CA, Hawes JE, Naeem S (2016) Multitrophic diversity effects of network degradation. Ecol Evol 6:4936–4946.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2253 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Niphadkar M, Nagendra H (2016) Remote sensing of invasive plants: incorporating functional traits into the picture. Int J Remote Sens 37:3074–3085.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1193795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Orihuela RLL, Peres CA, Mendes G et al (2015) Markedly divergent tree assemblage responses to tropical forest loss and fragmentation across a strong seasonality gradient. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136018 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Pakeman RJ (2011) Functional diversity indices reveal the impacts of land use intensification on plant community assembly. J Ecol 99:1143–1151.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01853.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Purschke O, Sykes MT, Reitalu T et al (2012) Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2142-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Quesada M, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Alvarez-Añorve M et al (2009) Succession and management of tropical dry forests in the Americas: review and new perspectives. For Ecol Manage.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Reed DH, Bryant EH (2000) Experimental tests of minimum viable population size. Anim Conserv.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00082.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Reich PB (2014) The world-wide ‘fast-slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J Ecol 102:275–301.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1997) From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Ecology 94:13730–13734.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.25.13730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Rocchini D, Bacaro G, Chirici G et al (2018) Remotely sensed spatial heterogeneity as an exploratory tool for taxonomic and functional diversity study. Ecol Indic 85:983–990.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sams MA, Lai HR, Bonser SP et al (2017) Landscape context explains changes in the functional diversity of regenerating forests better than climate or species richness. Glob Ecol Biogeogr.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Segura G, Balvanera P, Durán E, Pérez A (2003) Tree community structure and stem mortality along a water availability gradient in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Plant Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026029122077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sfair JC, Arroyo-Rodriguez V, Santos BA, Tabarelli M (2016) Taxonomic and functional divergence of tree assemblages in a fragmented tropical forest. Ecol Appl 26:1816–1826.  https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1673.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Soliveres S, DeSoto L, Maestre FT, Olano JM (2010) Spatio-temporal heterogeneity in abiotic factors modulate multiple ontogenetic shifts between competition and facilitation. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 12:227–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2010.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Spasojevic MJ, Turner BL, Myers JA (2016) When does intraspecific trait variation contribute to functional beta-diversity? J Ecol 104:487–496.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Stephenson AG (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:253–279.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Swenson NG (2014) Functional and phylogenetic ecology in R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tabarelli M, Lopes AV, Peres CA (2008) Edge-effects drive tropical forest fragments towards an early-successional system. Biotropica 40:657–661.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00454.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tabarelli M, Peres CA, Melo FPL (2012) The “few winners and many losers” paradigm revisited: emerging prospects for tropical forest biodiversity. Biol, ConservGoogle Scholar
  108. Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D et al (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 80(277):1300–1302.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5330.1300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA et al (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes-eight hypotheses. Biol Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Turner IM (1996) Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. J Appl Ecol 33:200–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Ustin SL, Gamon JA (2010) Remote sensing of plant functional types. New Phytol 186:795–816CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Verheyen K, Vellend M, Van Calster H (2004) Metapopulation dynamics in changing landscapes: a new spatially realistic model for forest plants. Ecology.  https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2008) New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89:2290–2301.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1206.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Violle C, Navas ML, Vile D et al (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Weathers KC, Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2001) Forest edges as nutrient and pollutant concentrators: Potential synergisms between fragmentation, forest canopies, and the atmosphere. Conserv Biol 15:1506–1514.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.01090.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Westoby M (1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 199:213–227.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004327224729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains. Ecol Monogr, Orgeon and California.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1943563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2389612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Wirth R, Meyer S, Leal I, Tabarelli M (2008) Plant herbivore interactions at the forest edge. Prog Bot.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72954-9_17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02403 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Tree 11:413–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)10045-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Zhu H, Xu ZF, Wang H, Li BG (2004) Tropical rain forest fragmentation and its ecological and species diversity changes in southern Yunnan. Biodivers Conserv.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000019397.98407.c3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The School of Biological SciencesWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.Grupo de Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Departamento de Ciencias biológicasUniversidad de los AndesBogotáColombia
  3. 3.Department of Marine ScienceUniversity of Texas at AustinPort AransasUSA
  4. 4.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.AMAP (botAnique et Modélisation de l’Architecture des Plantes et des végétations), IRD, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAUniversité de MontpellierMontpellierFrance
  6. 6.Department of Biology (mc WB 816)Roosevelt UniversityChicagoUSA
  7. 7.Science and Education, The Field MuseumChicagoUSA
  8. 8.Department of Biology and Ecology CenterUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations