, Volume 191, Issue 1, pp 231–240 | Cite as

Wandering spiders recover more slowly than web-building spiders after fire

  • Inam YekwayoEmail author
  • James S. Pryke
  • René Gaigher
  • Michael J. Samways
Conservation ecology – original research


Fire is a natural feature of many ecosystems, with some vegetation types highly adapted to fire. However, very little is known about the effect of fire on spiders, especially as fires have become more frequent owing to human activity. We determine whether different spider functional guilds (web builders vs. wanderers) respond differently to fires in the sclerophyllous fynbos. We determine also the effect of rockiness as refuge for these guilds and whether it influences their post-fire recovery. There were three site categories of time-since-last fire: 3 months, 1 year, and 7 years. We found that fire caused a decline in spider richness and abundance, with the 3-month category supporting the lowest. In sites that were burned within 1 year, abundance of wanderers was as high as in sites that had 7 years to recover, whereas species richness and abundance of web builders in sites that were burned 1 year ago were as low as in recently burned sites. However, assemblages of wanderers differed among categories, while no differences were observed for web builders, highlighting that wanderers took longer time to recover than web builders. Species richness and abundance of both guilds were not affected by different levels of rockiness. However, rockiness is important in shaping assemblages of wanderers. The results emphasize that the assemblages of greatest conservation concern with increased fire frequencies are wanderers and are candidate surrogates for monitoring post-fire recovery. These results highlight the need to allow fynbos vegetation to recover fully between fire intervals and draws attention to the dangers of frequent unplanned fires.


Arachnids Fire Rockiness Fynbos Greater Cape Floristic Region 



We thank Rustenburg, Boschendal, and Montagne farms for access, and D. Ngadze, P. Tshililo, Z. Tyeku, F. Becker, B. Dlamini, M. Mukundamago, S. Mensah, R. Agrela, L. Sikhutshwa, M. Pheme, S. Adu-Acheampong, and A. Katumanyane for field assistance. Funding was from the National Research Foundation (freestanding postdoctoral fellowship—SFP150722129143), and the work was carried out under Cape Nature collection permit no. AAA007-00196-0056.

Author contribution statement

IY, JSP, RG and MJS conceived and designed the project, IY investigated and curated data, IY and JSP analysed data, IY, JSP and MJS acquired funding, IY administered the project, IY and JSP acquired resources, IY validated and visualized the project, IY wrote the original draft of the manuscript, JSP, RG and MJS edited and reviewed the manuscript.


  1. Anderson MJ (2006) Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62:245–253. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecol 84:511–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D (2005) Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News 5:27–30Google Scholar
  4. Brandt Y, Lubin Y (1998) An experimental manipulation of vegetation structure: consequences for desert spiders. Isr J Zool 44:201–216Google Scholar
  5. Braschler B, Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2012) The fynbos and succulent karoo biomes do not have exceptional local ant richness. PLoS ONE 7:1–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cera I, Spuņģis V (2011) Seasonal activity of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) in coastal dune habitats at Akmensrags-Ziemupe Nature Reserve, Latvia. Environ Exper Biol 9:91–97Google Scholar
  7. Chai YQ, Wilgers DJ (2015) Effects of temperature and light levels on refuge use and activity in the wolf spider. Trans Kansas Acad Sci 118(3–4):194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cowling RM (1992) The ecology of fynbos: nutrients, fire and diversity. Oxford University Press, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  9. Crous CJ, Samways MJ, Pryke JS (2013) Exploring the mesofilter as a novel operational scale in conservation planning. J Appl Ecol 50:205–214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Cáceres M, Legendre P (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecol 90:3566–3574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dippenaar-Schoeman AS (2014) Field guide to the spiders of South Africa. LAPA Publishers, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  12. Dippenaar-Schoeman AS, Leroy A (2003) A checklist of the spiders of the Kruger National Park, South Africa, South Africa (Arachnida: Araneae). Koedoe 46:91–100. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dippenaar-Schoeman AS, Van den Berg MV, Van den Berg AM, Van den Berg A (2001) Spiders in macadamia orchards in the Mpumalanga Lowveld of South Africa: species diversity and abundance (Arachnida: Araneae). Afr Plant Prot 7:39–46Google Scholar
  14. Dippenaar-Schoeman AS, Van den Berg AM, Van den Berg MA, Foord SH (2005) Spiders in avocado orchards in the Mpumalanga Lowveld of South Africa: species diversity and abundance (Arachnida: Araneae). Afr Plant Prot 11:8–16Google Scholar
  15. Fasola M, Mogavero F (1995) Structure and habitat use in a web-building spider community in northern Italy. Ital J Zool 62:159–166. Google Scholar
  16. Foord SH, Dippenaar-Schoeman AS, Haddad CR, Lotz LN, Lyle R (2011) The faunistic diversity of spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of the savanna biome in South Africa. Trans R Soc S Afr 66:170–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foord SH, Dippenaar-Schoeman AS, Jocqué R, Haddad CR, Lyle R, Webb P (2016) South African National Survay of Arachnida: a checklist of spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) of the Lekgalameetse Nature Reserve, Limpopo province, South Africa. Koedoe 58:1–8. Google Scholar
  18. Foster CN, Barton PS, Wood JT, Lindenmayer DB (2015) Interactive effects of fire and large herbivores on web-building spiders. Oecologia 179:237–248. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hore U, Uniyal VP (2008) Effect of prescribed fire on spider assemblage in Terai grasslands India. Turk J Arch 1:15–36Google Scholar
  20. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hugo-Coetzee EA, Avenant NL (2011) The effect of fire on soil oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) in a South African grassland. Zoosymposia 6:210–220Google Scholar
  22. Hunter ML Jr (2005) A mesofilter conservation strategy to complement fine and coarse filters. Conserv Biol 19:1025–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joubert L, Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2014) Annual burning drives plant communities in remnant grassland ecological networks in an afforested landscape. S Afr J Bot 92:126–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kraaij T, Cowling RM, Van Wilgen BW (2013) Fire regimes in eastern coastal fynbos: imperatives and thresholds in managing for diversity. Koedoe 55:1–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kwon TS, Park YK, Lim JH, Ryou SH, Lee CM (2013) Change of arthropod abundance in burned forests: different patterns according to functional guilds. J Asia Pac Entomol 16:322–328. Google Scholar
  26. Lapinski W, Tschapka M (2013) Habitat use in an assemblage of Central American wandering spiders. J Arachn 41:151–159. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Melliger RL, Braschler B, Rusterholz HP, Baur B (2018) Diverse effects of degree of urbanisation and forest size on species richness and functional diversity of plants and ground surface-active ants and spiders. PLoS ONE 13:15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moretti M (2002) Effects of winter fire on spiders. Eur Arachn 2000:183–190Google Scholar
  29. Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2011) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  30. New TR (2014) Insects, fire and conservation. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parr CL, Robertson HG, Biggs HC, Chown SL (2004) Response of African savanna ants to long-term fire regimes. J Appl Ecol 41:630–642. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Podgaiski LR, Joner F, Lavorel S, Moretti M, Ibanez S, Mendonc MS, Pillar VD Jr (2013) Spider trait assembly patterns and resilience under fire-induced vegetation change in South Brazilian grasslands. PLoS ONE 8:1–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Proçhes S, Cowling RM (2006) Insect diversity in Cape fynbos and neighbouring South African vegetation. Global Ecol Biogeogr 15:445–451. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2010) Significant variables for the conservation of mountain invertebrates. J Insect Conserv 14:247–256. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2012a) Importance of using many taxa and having adequate controls for monitoring impacts of fire for arthropod conservation. J Insect Conserv 16:177–185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2012b) Differential resilience of invertebrates to fire. Austral Ecol 37:460–469. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Richardson DM, Van Wilgen BW (1992) Ecosystem, community and species response to fire in mountain fynbos: conclusions from the Swartboskloof experiment. In: Van Wilgen BM, Richardson DM, Kruger FJ, Van Hensbergen HJ (eds) Fire in South African Mountain Fynbos. Ecol Stud 93: 273 − 314Google Scholar
  38. Sasal Y, Raffaele E, Farji-Brener AG (2015) Consequences of fire of and cattle browsing on ground beetle (Coleoptera) in NW Patagonia. Ecol Res 30:1015–1023. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stewart AJ, Wright AF (1995) A new inexpensive suction apparatus for sampling arthropods in grassland. Ecol Entomol 20:98–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Swart RC, Pryke JS, Roets F (2017) Optimising the sampling of foliage arthropods from scrubland vegetation for biodiversity studies. Afr Entomol 25:164–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taucare-Ríos A, Velos C, Bustamante RO (2017) Microhabitat selection in the sand recluse spider (Sicarius thomisoides): the effect of rock size and temperature. J Nat Hist 51:2199–2210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Uetz GW (1977) Coexistence in a guild of wandering spiders. J Anim Ecol 46:531–541. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van der Merwe H, Van Rooyen MW (2011) Vegetation trends following fire in the Roggeveld, Mountain Renosterveld, South Africa. Afr J Bot 77:127–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yekwayo I, Pryke JS, Gaigher R, Samways MJ (2018) Only multi-taxon studies show the full range of arthropod responses to fire. PLoS ONE 13:15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biology and Environmental SciencesUniversity of MpumalangaNelspruitSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Conservation Ecology and EntomologyStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations