Advertisement

Oecologia

pp 1–10 | Cite as

Individual and interactive effects of herbivory on plant fitness: endopolyploidy as a driver of genetic variation in tolerance and resistance

  • J. Miles Mesa
  • John A. Juvik
  • Ken N. PaigeEmail author
Plant-microbe-animal interactions – original research

Abstract

Previous studies have shown a causal link between mammalian herbivory, tolerance, and chemical defense in Arabidopsis thaliana, driven by the process of endoreduplication (replication of the genome without mitosis). Removal of the apical meristem by mammalian herbivores lowers auxin, which triggers entry into the endocycle. Increasing chromosome number through endoreduplication, and therefore gene copy number, provides a means of increasing gene expression promoting rapid regrowth rates, higher defensive chemistry and enhanced fitness. Here, we assess whether insect leaf-feeding elicits the same compensatory response as the removal of apical dominance. Insect feeding has been shown to downregulate auxin production, which should trigger endoreduplication. Results here support this contention; insect leaf-feeding by Trichoplusia ni elicited a compensatory response similar to that of mammalian herbivores—an ecotype-specific response consistent with the level of endoreduplication. The interactive effects of mammalian and insect herbivory were also assessed to determine whether interactions were additive (pairwise) or non-additive (diffuse) on tolerance (fitness). Specifically, results indicate that herbivory is either diffuse (a significant clipping × T. ni interaction) or pairwise (no significant interaction between clipping and T. ni herbivory), dependent upon plant genotype and compensatory ability. In general, herbivore-induced changes in plant quality appear to be responsible for the observed differences in herbivory and fitness compensation. We discuss the importance of evaluating endoreduplication among plants within a population to avoid masking the association between tolerance and resistance and the fitness consequences of multi-herbivore interactions.

Keywords

Arabidopsis Endoreduplication Fitness compensation Glucosinolates Overcompensation Oxidative pentose phosphate pathway Resistance Tolerance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Flow Cytometry Facility at Iowa State for their aid in measuring endopolyploidy. We also thank Katy Heath and Ray Zielinski for their comments that helped improve this manuscript. This research was supported by awards from the National Science Foundation (DEB-1146085) and the University of Illinois Campus Research Board to KNP.

Author contribution statement

KNP and JMM conceived and designed the experiments. JMM performed the experiments. JMM and KNP analyzed the data. JAJ and JMM conducted the chemical analyses. JMM and KNP wrote the manuscript, JAJ provided editorial services.

Supplementary material

442_2019_4458_MOESM1_ESM.docx (58 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 58 kb)

References

  1. Anderson LL, Paige KN (2003) Multiple herbivores and coevolutionary interactions in an Ipomopsis hybrid swarm. Evol Ecol 17:139–156.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023066101074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin IT (1989) Mechanism of damage-induced alkaloid production in wild tobacco. J Chem Ecol 15:1661–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin IT, Zhang Z-P, Diab N, Ohnmeiss TE, McCloud ES, Lynds GY, Schmelz EA (1997) Quantification, correlations and manipulations of wound-induced changes in jasmonic acid and nicotine in Nicotiana sylvestris. Planta 201:397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barow M, Meister A (2003) Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated to systematics, organ, life strategy and genome size. Plant Cell Environ 26:571–584.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00988.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beekwilder J, Van Leeuwen W, Van Dam NM, Bertossi M, Grandi V, Mizzi L, Verbocht H (2008) The impact of the absence of aliphatic glucosinolates on insect herbivory in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 3:e2068.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brodsky WY, Uryvaeva IV (1977) Cell polyploidy: its relation to tissue growth and function. Int Rev Cytol 50:275–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)60100-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown DG, Weis AE (1995) Direct and indirect effects of prior grazing of goldenrod upon the performance of a leaf beetle. Ecology 76:426–436.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1941201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown PD, Tokuhisa JG, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J (2003) Variation of glucosinolate accumulation among different organs and developmental stages of Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 62:471–481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00549-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fritz RS (1992) Community structure and species interactions of phytophagous insects on resistant and susceptible host plants. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 240–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049–1051.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4601.1049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garren JM, Strauss SY (2009) Population-level compensation by an invasive thistle thwarts biological control from seed predators. Ecol Appl 19:709–721.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0646.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hougen-Eitzman D, Rausher MD (1994) Interactions between herbivorous insects and plant-insect coevolution. Am Nat 143:677–697.  https://doi.org/10.1086/285626 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ishida T, Adachi S, Yoshimura M, Shimizu K, Umeda M, Sugimoto K (2010) Auxin modulates the transition from the mitotic cycle to the endocycle in Arabidopsis. Development 137:63–71.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.035840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jander G, Cui J, Nhan B, Pierce NE, Ausubel FM (2001) The TASTY locus on chromosome 1 of Arabidopsis affects feeding of the insect herbivore Trichoplusia ni. Plant Physiol 126:890–898.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.126.2.890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Juenger T, Bergelson J (1998) Pairwise versus diffuse natural selection and the multiple herbivores of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 52:1583–1592.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02239.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Juenger T, Bergelson J (2000) The evolution of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution 54:764–777.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00078.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karban R (1989) Fine-scale adaptation of herbivorous thrips to individual host plants. Nature 340:60–61.  https://doi.org/10.1038/340060a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karban R, Strauss SY (1993) Effects of herbivores on growth and reproduction of their perennial host, Erigeron glaucus. Ecology 74:39–46.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1939499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lambrix V, Reichelt M, Mitchell-Olds T, Kliebenstein DJ, Gershenzon J (2001) The Arabidopsis epithiospecifier protein promotes the hydrolysis of glucosinolates to nitriles and influences Trichoplusia ni herbivory. Plant Cell 13:2793–2807.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leimu R, Koricheva J (2006) A meta-analysis of tradeoffs between plant tolerance and resistance to herbivores: combining the evidence from ecological and agricultural studies. Oikos 112:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.41023.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Q, Eigenbrode SD, Stringam GR, Thiagarajah MR (2000) Feeding and growth of Plutella xylostella and Spodoptera eridania on Brassica juncea with varying glucosinolate concentrations and myrosinase activities. J Chem Ecol 26:2401–2419.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9825-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lister C, Dean C (1993) Recombinant inbred lines for mapping RFLP and phenotypic markers in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 4:745–750.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04040745.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Louda SM (1983) Seed predation and seedling mortality in the recruitment of a shrub, Haplopappus venetus (Asteraceae), along a climatic gradient. Ecology 64:511–521.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1939971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mauricio R, Rausher MD, Burdick DS (1997) Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McFadyen REC (1998) Biological control of weeds. Annu Rev Entomol 43:369–393.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Melaragno JE, Mehrotra B, Coleman AW (1993) Relationship between endopolyploidy and cell size in epidermal tissue of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 5:1661–1668.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.5.11.1661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mesa JM, Scholes DR, Juvik JA, Paige KN (2017) Molecular constraints on resistance–tolerance trade-offs. Ecology 98:2528–2537.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muola A, Mutikainen P, Laukkanen L, Lilley M, Leimu R (2010) Genetic variation in herbivore resistance and tolerance: the role of plant life-history stage and type of damage. J Evol Biol 23:2185–2196.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02077.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagl W (1976) DNA endoreduplication and polyteny understood as evolutionary strategies. Nature 261:614–615.  https://doi.org/10.1038/261614a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Núñez-Farfán J, Fornoni J, Valverde PL (2007) The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:541–566.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Onkokesung N, Gális I, von Dahl CC, Matsuoka K, Saluz HP, Baldwin IT (2010) Jasmonic acid and ethylene modulate local responses to wounding and simulated herbivory in Nicotiana attenuata leaves. Plant Physiol 153:785–798.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.156232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paige KN (1992) The effects of fire on scarlet gilia: an alternative selection pressure to herbivory? Oecologia 92:229–235.  https://doi.org/10.1086/284645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paige KN (2018) Overcompensation, environmental stress, and the role of endoreduplication. Am J Bot 105:1105–1108.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paige KN, Whitham TG (1987) Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. Am Nat 129:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pigliucci M (2002) Ecology and evolutionary biology of Arabidopsis. In: Somerville CR, Meyerowitz EM (eds) The Arabidopsis book. American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville, p e0003Google Scholar
  36. Pilson D (1996) Two herbivores and constraints on selection for resistance in Brassica rapa. Evolution 50:1492–1500.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03922.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poelman EH, Broekgaarden C, Van Loon JJA, Docke M (2008) Early season herbivore differentially affects plant defence responses to subsequently colonizing herbivores and their abundance in the field. Mol Ecol 17:3352–3365.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03838.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Russell-Mercier JL, Sargent RD (2015) Indirect effects of herbivory on plant–pollinator interactions in invasive Lythrum salicaria. Am J Bot 102:661–668.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schat M, Blossey B (2005) Influence of natural and simulated leaf beetle herbivory on biomass allocation and plant architecture of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.). Environ Entomol 34:906–914.  https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-34.4.906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scholes DR, Paige KN (2011) Chromosomal plasticity: mitigating the impacts of herbivory. Ecology 92:1691–1698.  https://doi.org/10.1890/10-2269.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scholes DR, Paige KN (2014) Plasticity in ploidy underlies plant fitness compensation to herbivore damage. Mol Ecol 23:4862–4870.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scholes DR, Dalrymple J, Mesa JM, Banta JA, Paige KN (2017) An assessment of the molecular mechanisms contributing to tolerance to apical damage in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Ecol 218:265–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0685-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schultz JC, Baldwin IT (1982) Oak leaf quality declines in response to defoliation by gypsy moth larvae. Science 217:149–151.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.217.4555.149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shi Q, Li C, Zhang F (2006) Nicotine synthesis in Nicotiana tabacum L. induced by mechanical wounding is regulated by auxin. J Exp Bot 57:2899–2907.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shorey HH, Andres LA, Hale RL Jr (1962) The biology of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) I. Life history and behavior. Ann Entomol Soc Am 55:591–597.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/55.5.591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siddappaji MH, Scholes DR, Bohn M, Paige KN (2013) Overcompensation in response to herbivory in Arabidopsis thaliana: the role of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and the oxidative pentose-phosphate pathway. Genetics 195:589–598.  https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.154351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stowe KA, Marquis RJ, Hochwender CG, Simms EL (2000) The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:565–595.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Strauss SY, Conner JK, Lehtilä KP (2001) Effects of foliar herbivory by insects on the fitness of Raphanus raphanistrum: damage can increase male fitness. Am Nat 158:496–504.  https://doi.org/10.1086/323116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strauss SY, Watson W, Allen MT (2003) Predictors of male and female tolerance to insect herbivory in Raphanus raphanistrum. Ecology 84:2074–2082.  https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strauss SY, Sahli H, Conner JK (2005) Toward a more trait-centered approach to diffuse (co) evolution. New Phytol 165:81–90.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01228.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomsen CJ, Sargent RD (2017) Evidence that a herbivore tolerance response affects selection on floral traits and inflorescence architecture in purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Ann Bot 119:1295–1303.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Utsumi S, Ohgushi T (2009) Community-wide impacts of herbivore-induced plant regrowth on arthropods in a multi-willow species system. Oikos 118:1805–1815.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17580.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Zandt PA, Agrawal AA (2004) Community-wide impacts of herbivore-induced plant responses in milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Ecology 85:2616–2629.  https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang D, Pajerowska-Mukhtar K, Culler AH, Dong X (2007) Salicylic acid inhibits pathogen growth in plants through repression of the auxin signaling pathway. Curr Biol 17:1784–1790.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wathelet JP, Iori R, Mabon N, Palmieri S, Leoni O, Rollin P, Marlier M (2001) Determination of the response factors of several desulfo-glucosinolates used for quantitative analysis of Brassicaceae. International Rapeseed Congress Technical Meeting, Poznan, Poland, June 5-7 2001Google Scholar
  56. Wise MJ, Sacchi CF (1996) Impact of two specialist insect herbivores on reproduction of horse nettle, Solanum carolinense. Oecologia 108:328–337.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Integrative BiologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Crop SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations