pp 1–10 | Cite as

Foraging strategies of individual silky pocket mice over a boom–bust cycle in a stochastic dryland ecosystem

  • Jennifer D. Noble
  • Scott L. CollinsEmail author
  • Alesia J. Hallmark
  • Karin Maldonado
  • Blair O. Wolf
  • Seth D. Newsome
Population ecology – original research


Small mammals use multiple foraging strategies to compensate for fluctuating resource quality in stochastic environments. These strategies may lead to increased dietary overlap when competition for resources is strong. To quantify temporal contributions of high (C3) versus low quality (C4) resources in diets of silky pocket mice (Perognathus flavus), we used stable carbon isotope (δ13C) analysis of 1391 plasma samples collected over 2 years. Of these, 695 samples were from 170 individuals sampled ≥ 3 times across seasons or years, allowing us to assess changes in dietary breadth at the population and individual levels across a boom–bust population cycle. In 2014, the P. flavus population increased to 412 captures compared to 8 captures in prior and subsequent years, while populations of co-occurring small mammals remained stable. As intraspecific competition increased, the population-wide dietary niche of P. flavus did not change, but individual specialization increased significantly. During this period, ~ 27% (41/151) of individuals sampled specialized on C3 resources, which were abundant during the spring and previous fall seasons. Most of the remaining individuals were C3–C4 generalists (64%) (96/151), and only 9% (14/151) specialized on C4 resources. In 2015, P. flavus population density and resource availability declined, individual dietary breadth expanded (84% generalists), no C3 specialists were found, and specialization on C4 resources increased (16%). Our results demonstrate a high degree of inter-individual plasticity in P. flavus foraging strategies, which has implications for how this species will respond to environmental change that is predicted to decrease C3 resources in the future.


Generalists Intraspecific competition Niche variation hypothesis Perognathus flavus Specialists 



We thank N. Wilson, A. Richins, and M. Rodriquez Curras for assistance with fieldwork, and L. Burkemper and V. Atudorei for stable isotopes for analytical support. The research was completed with start-up funding to SDN, grants from NSF to the University of New Mexico for Long-term Ecological Research, and graduate research scholarships to JDN.

Author contribution statement

SDN and BOW conceived and designed the study, SDN and JDN collected field data, JDN processed samples, analyzed data and drafted the manuscript, AJH and KM helped with data analysis and graphics, and all authors provided text and edited the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

Fieldwork was conducted with permission from the Fish and Wildlife Service and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC #13-100970-MC). All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Supplementary material

442_2019_4432_MOESM1_ESM.docx (348 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 348 kb)


  1. Aarssen LW, Taylor RD (1992) Fecundity allocation in herbaceous plants. Oikos 65:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agashe D, Bolnick DI (2010) Intraspecific genetic variation and competition interact to influence niche expansion. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277:2915–2924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araújo MS, Gonzaga MO (2007) Individual specialization in the hunting wasp Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) albonigrum (Hymenoptera, Crabronidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1855–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araújo MS, Guimarães PR, Svanbäck R, Pinheiro A, Guuimarães P, Dos Reis SF, Bolnick DI (2008) Network analysis reveals contrasting effects of intraspecific competition on individual vs. population diets. Ecology 89:1981–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Araújo MS, Bolnick DI, Martinelli LA, Giaretta AA, Dos Reis SF (2009) Individual-level diet variation in four species of Brazilian frogs. J Anim Ecol 78:848–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Araújo MS, Bolnick DI, Layman CA (2011) The ecological causes of individual specialisation. Ecol Lett 14:948–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell AM (2007) Evolutionary biology: animal personalities. Nature 447:539–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bison M, Ibanez S, Redjadj C, Boyer F, Coissac E, Miquel C, Rioux D, Said S, Maillard D, Taberlet P, Yoccoz NG, Loison A (2015) Upscaling the niche variation hypothesis from the intra- to the inter-specific level. Oecologia 179:835–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolnick DI, Yang LH, Fordyce JA, Davis JM, Svanbäck R (2002) Measuring individual-level resource specialization. Ecology 83:2936–2941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Araújo MS, Persson L (2007) Comparative support for the niche variation hypothesis that more generalized populations also are more heterogeneous. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:10075–10079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bolnick DI, Ingram T, Stutz WE, Snowberg LK, Lau OL, Paull JS (2010) Ecological release from interspecific competition leads to decoupled changes in population and individual niche width. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277:1789–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Canty A, Ripley B (2017) boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R Package Version 1:3–20Google Scholar
  14. Caut S, Angulo E, Courchamp F (2009) Variation in discrimination factors (Δ15 N and Δ13C): the effect of diet isotopic values and applications for diet reconstruction. J Appl Ecol 46:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins SL, Belnap J, Grimm NB, Rudgers JA, Dahm CN, D’Odorico P, Litvak M, Natvig DO, Peters DC, Pockman WT, Sinsabaugh RL, Wolf BO (2014) A multiscale, hierarchical model of pulse dynamics in aridland ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:397–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook BI, Ault TR, Smerdon JE (2015) Unprecedented 21st century drought risk in the American Southwest and Central Plains. Sci Adv. Google Scholar
  17. Costa GC, Mesquita DO, Colli GR, Vitt LJ (2008) Niche expansion and the niche variation hypothesis: does the degree of individual variation increase in depauperate assemblages? Am Nat 172:868–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costa-Pereira R, Tavares LER, de Camargo PB, Araújo MS (2017) Seasonal population and individual niche dynamics in a tetra fish in the Pantanal wetlands. Biotropica 49:531–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dickman CR, Greenville AC, Tamayo B, Wardle GM (2011) Spatial dynamics of small mammals in central Australian desert habitats: the role of drought refugia. J Mammal 92:1193–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ernest SKM, Brown JH, Parmenter RR (2000) Rodents, plants, and precipitation: spatial and temporal dynamics of consumers and resources. Oikos 88:470–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farquhar GD, O’Leary MH, Berry JA (1982) On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust J Plant Phys 9:121–137Google Scholar
  23. Fox BJ (2011) Review of small mammal trophic structure in drylands: resource availability, use, and disturbance. J Mammal 92:1179–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frédérich B, Lehanse O, Vandewalle P, Lepoint G (2010) Trophic niche width, shift, and specialization of Dascyllus aruanus in Toliara Lagoon, Madagascar. Copeia 2010:218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guo QF (2003) Temporal species richness-biomass relationships along successional gradients. J Veg Sci 14:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo QF, Brown JH, Valone TJ, Kachman SD, Aug N (2000) Constraints of seed size on plant distribution and abundance. Ecology 81:2149–2155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hart SP, Schreiber SJ, Levine JM (2016) How variation between individuals affects species coexistence. Ecol Lett 19:825–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Herrera LGM, Korine C, Fleming TH, Arad Z (2008) Dietary implications of intrapopulation variation in nitrogen isotope composition of an old world fruit bat. J Mammal 89:1184–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoffmeister DF (1986) Mammals of Arizona. University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  30. Hope AG, Parmenter RR (2007) Food habits of rodents inhabiting arid and semi-arid ecosystems of central New Mexico. Spec Publ Mus Southwest Biol 9:1–75Google Scholar
  31. Kartzinel TR, Chen PA, Coverdale TC, Erickson DL, Kress WJ, Kuzmina ML, Rubenstein DI, Wang W, Pringle RM (2015) DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:8019–8024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kelt DA (2011) Comparative ecology of desert small mammals: a selective review of the past 30 years. J Mammal 92:1158–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kotler BP, Ayal Y, Subach A (1994) Effects of predatory risk and resource renewal on the timing of foraging activity in a gerbil community. Oecologia 100:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kurle CM, Finkelstein ME, Smith KR, George D, Ciani D, Koch PL, Smith DR (2013) Discrimination factors for stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in blood and feathers from chicks and juveniles of the California condor. Condor 115:492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lehmann D, Mfune JK, Gewers E, Brain C, Voigt CC (2015) Individual variation of isotopic niches in grazing and browsing desert ungulates. Oecologia 179:75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lescroël A, Ballard G, Toniolo V, Barton KJ, Wilson PR, Lyver POB, Ainley DG (2010) Working less to gain more: when breeding quality relates to foraging efficiency. Ecology 91:2044–2055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Letnic M, Dickman CR (2010) Resource pulses and mammalian dynamics: conceptual models for hummock grasslands and other Australian desert habitats. Biol Rev 85:501–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lima M, Ernest SKM, Brown JH, Belgrano A, Stenseth NC (2008) Chihuahuan Desert kangaroo rats: nonlinear effects of population dynamics, competition, and rainfall. Ecology 89:2594–2603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maldonado K, Newsome SD, Razeto-Barry P, Manuel Rios J, Piriz G, Sabat P (2019) Individual diet specialization is driven by phenotypic plasticity in digestive enzymes and trade-offs in animal performance. Ecol Lett 22:128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martínez Del Rio C, Sabat P, Anderson-Sprecher R, Gonzalez SP (2009) Dietary and isotopic specialization: the isotopic niche of three Cinclodes ovenbirds. Oecologia 161:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCluney KE, Belnap J, Collins SL, González AL, Hagen EM, Holland JN, Kotler BP, Maestre FT, Smith SD, Wolf BO (2012) Shifting species interactions in terrestrial dryland ecosystems under altered water availability and climate change. Biol Rev 87:563–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meserve PL, Kelt DA, Milstead WB, Gutiérrez JR (2003) Thirteen years of shifting top-down and bottom-up control. Bioscience 53:633–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meserve PL, Dickman CR, Kelt DA (2011) Small mammal community structure and dynamics in aridlands: overall patterns and contrasts with Southern Hemispheric systems. J Mammal 92:1223–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moore DI (2016) Meteorology data from the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico (1988–2015). Environmental Data Initiative. Dataset accessed 16 June 2018
  45. Muldavin EH, Moore DI, Collins SL, Wetherill KR, Lightfoot DC (2008) Aboveground net primary production dynamics in a northern Chihuahuan Desert ecosystem. Oecologia 155:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mulhouse JM, Hallett LM, Collins SL (2017) The influence of seasonal precipitation and grass competition on 20 years of forb dynamics in northern Chihuahuan Desert grassland. J Veg Sci 28:250–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Newsome SD (2018) Small mammal mark-recapture population dynamics at core research sites at the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico (1989–present). Environmental Data Initiative. Dataset Accessed 6/16/2018
  48. Notaro M, Liu Z, Gallimore RG, Williams JW, Gutzler DS, Collins SL (2010) Complex seasonal cycle of ecohydrology in the Southwest United States. J Geophys Res 115:G04034. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Orr TJ, Newsome SD, Wolf BO (2015) Cacti supply limited nutrients to a desert rodent community. Oecologia 178:1045–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parmenter RR, Yates TL, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Dunnum JL, Franklin AB, Friggens MT, Lubow BC, Miller M, Olson GS, Parmenter CA, Pollard J, Rexstad E, Shenk TM, Stanley TR, White GC (2003) Small-mammal density estimation: a field comparison of grid-based vs. web-based density estimators. Ecol Monogr 73:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parnell AC, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL (2010) Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation. PLoS One. Google Scholar
  52. Petrie MD, Collins SL, Gutzler DS, Moore DI (2014) Regional trends and local variability in monsoon precipitation in the northern Chihuahuan Desert, USA. J Arid Environ 103:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Previtali MA, Lima M, Meserve PL, Kelt DA, Gutiérrez JR (2009) Population dynamics of two sympatric rodents in a variable environment: rainfall, resource variability, and predation. Ecology 90:1996–2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  55. Rosenblatt AE, Nifong JC, Heithaus MR, Mazzotti FJ, Cherkiss MS, Jeffery BM, Elsey RM, Decker RA, Silliman BR, Guillette LJ Jr, Lowers RH, Larson JC (2015) Factors affecting individual foraging specialization and temporal diet stability across the range of a large “generalist” apex predator. Oecologia 178:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roughgarden J (1972) Evolution of niche width. Am Nat 106:683–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rudgers JA, Chung YA, Maurer GE, Moore DI, Muldavin EH, Litvak M, Collins SL (2018) Climate sensitivity functions and net primary production: a framework for incorporating climate mean and variability. Ecology 99:576–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sala OE, Gherardi LA, Reichmann L, Jobbagy E, Peters D (2012) Legacies of precipitation fluctuations on primary production: theory and data synthesis. Phil Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 367:3135–3144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smiley TM, Cotton LM, Badgley C, Cerling TE (2015) Small-mammal isotope ecology tracks climate and vegetation gradients across western North America. Oikos 125:1100–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith TB, Skúlason S (1996) Evolutionary significance of resource polymorphisms in fishes, amphibians, and birds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:111–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Soininen EM, Ehrich D, Lecomte N, Yoccoz NG, Tarroux A, Berteaux D, Gauthier G, Gielly L, Brochmann C, Gussarova G, Ims RA (2014) Sources of variation in small rodent trophic niche: new insights from DNA metabarcoding and stable isotope analysis. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 50:361–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Svanbäck R, Bolnick DI (2005) Intraspecific competition affects the strength of individual specialization: an optimal diet theory method. Evol Ecol Res 7:993–1012Google Scholar
  63. Svanbäck R, Bolnick DI (2007) Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274:839–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Terraube J, Guixé D, Arroyo B (2014) Diet composition and foraging success in generalist predators: are specialist individuals better foragers? Basic Appl Ecol 15:616–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thibault KM, Ernest SKM, White EP, Brown JH, Goheen JR (2010) Long-term insights into the influence of precipitation on community dynamics in desert rodents. J Mammal 91:787–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tinker MT, Bentall G, Estes JA (2008) Food limitation leads to behavioral diversification and dietary specialization in sea otters. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:560–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tsahar E, Wolf N, Izhaki I, Arad Z, Martinez Del Rio C (2008) Dietary protein influences the rate of 15 N incorporation in blood cells and plasma of Yellow-vented bulbuls (Pycnonotus xanthopygos). J Exp Biol 211:459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Valen L (1965) Morphological variation and width of ecological niche. Am Nat 99:377–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vander Wall SB (1990) Food hoarding in animals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  70. Warne RW, Pershall AD, Wolf BO (2010) Linking precipitation and C3–C4 plant production to resource dynamics in higher-trophic-level consumers. Ecology 91:1628–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wilson DS (1998) Adaptive individual differences within single populations. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 353:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wolff JO, Bateman GC (1978) Effects of food availability and ambient temperature on torpor cycles of Perognathus flavus (Heteromyidae). J Mammal 59:707–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Woo KJ, Elliott KH, Davidson M, Gaston AL, Davoren GK (2008) Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour. J Anim Ecol 77:1082–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Xia Y, Moore MI, Collins SL, Muldavin EH (2010) Aboveground production and species richness of annuals in Chihuahuan Desert grassland and shrub land plant communities. J Arid Environ 74:378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yates TL, Mills JN, Parmenter CA, Ksiazek TG, Parmenter RR, Vande Castle JR, Calisher CH, Nichol ST, Abbott KD, Young JC, Morrison ML, Beaty BJ, Dunnum JL, Baker RJ, Salazar-Bravo J, Peters CJ (2002) The ecology and evolutionary history of an emergent disease: hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Bioscience 52:989–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zaccarelli N, Bolnick DI, Mancinelli G (2013) RInSp: an r package for the analysis of individual specialization in resource use. Methods Ecol Evol 4:1018–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciencias, Facultad de Artes LiberalesUniversidad Adolfo IbañezSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations