Advertisement

Oecologia

pp 1–8 | Cite as

Unidirectional grass hairs usher insects away from meristems

  • Richard KarbanEmail author
  • Eric LoPresti
  • Geerat J. Vermeij
  • Robert Latta
Plant-microbe-animal interactions – original research

Abstract

Grasses are major agricultural products worldwide and they are critical to ecosystem function in many terrestrial habitats. Despite their global importance, we know relatively little about their defenses against herbivory. Grasses tend to be tolerant of leaf loss because their valuable meristems are located underground, out of reach for above ground herbivores. Many grasses have unidirectional leaf hairs, prickles, and spines that make moving up the leaf blade easy, but make moving down, toward the meristem, difficult. We tested the hypothesis that unidirectional grass hairs direct small arthropod herbivores away from the meristems. In a field survey of the distribution of herbivore damage, we found that leaf tips received five times more damage than leaf bases for Avena barbata. Early-instar grasshoppers fed three times as often on leaf tops as on leaf bases of pubescent individuals in a common garden laboratory experiment. This effect was not observed for glabrous individuals where grasshoppers damaged leaf bases as often as leaf tops. A common generalist caterpillar, Heliothus virescens, was more than twice as likely to turn in the direction of the hairs, away from the meristems, when it encountered pubescent leaves of A. barbata. However, larger caterpillars of the generalist feeder Arctia virginalis showed no directional bias when they encountered pubescent leaves. In common garden experiments, selection on pubescence was weak and inconsistent over space and time. Under some circumstances, individuals of A. barbata with pubescent leaves were more likely to produce seeds than were individuals with fewer hairs. The surveys, behavioral experiments with small insects, and estimates of lifetime reproduction all support the hypothesis that unidirectional leaf hairs on A. barbata, and perhaps other grasses, serve as an unstudied defense that direct small herbivores away from the meristems.

Keywords

Defense Herbivory Leaf hairs Movement Poaceae Pubescence Tolerance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Mikaela Huntzinger, Claire Karban, Jesse Karban, Katherine Toll, and Phil Ward for help with fieldwork. Ellen Dean identified the grasses. Mikaela Huntzinger and an anonymous reviewer improved the manuscript. The field studies were conducted at the UC McLaughlin Reserve, Hopland Research and Extension Center and Sierra Foothills Research and Extension Center, and we thank the staff for facilitating our work. We were supported by USDA multistate Grants NC-7 and NE-1501.

Author contribution statement

RK, EL, GV, and RL conceived the project. RK, EL, and RL designed the experiments. RK and RL performed the experiments. RK, EL, and RL analyzed the data. RK and RL wrote the manuscript, and EL and GV provided editorial advice.

References

  1. Allard RW, Babbel GR, Kahler AL, Clegg MT (1972) Evidence for coadaptation in Avena barbata. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 69:3043–3048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blair J, Nippert J, Briggs J (2014) Grassland ecology. In: Monson RK (ed) Ecology and the environment, the plant sciences, vol 8. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, pp 389–423Google Scholar
  3. Clay K (1990) Fungal endophytes of grasses. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:275–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clegg MT, Allard RW (1972) Patterns of genetic differentiation in slender wild oat species Avena barbata. Proc Natl Acad Sci 69:1820–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eaton KM, Karban R (2014) Effects of trichomes on the behavior and distribution of Platyprepia virginalis caterpillars. Entomol Exp Appl 151:144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Epstein E (1999) Silicon. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:641–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farmer EE (2014) Leaf defense. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gardner KM, Latta RG (2008) Heritable variation and genetic correlation of quantitative traits within and between ecotypes of Avena barbata. J Evol Biol 21:737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartley SE, DeGabriel JL (2016) The ecology of herbivore-induced silicon defences in grasses. Funct Ecol 30:1311–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jennings DL (1962) Some evidence on the influence of the morphology of raspberry canes upon their liability to be attacked by certain fungi. Hortic Res 1:100–111Google Scholar
  11. Johnson HB (1975) Plant pubescence: an ecological perspective. Bot Rev 41:233–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jungner JR (1891) Anpassungen der pflanzen an das klima in den gegenden der regenreichen kamerungebirge. Botanisches Centralblatt 47:353–360Google Scholar
  13. Karban R, Takabayashi J (2019) Chewing and other cues induce grass spines that protect meristems. Arthropod-Plant Interact.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-018-9666-1 Google Scholar
  14. Karban R, Karban C, Huntzinger M, Pearse IS, Crutsinger G (2010) Diet mixing enhances the performance of a generalist caterpillar, Platyprepia virginalis. Ecol Entomol 35:92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krimmel BA, Pearse IS (2013) Sticky plant traps insects to enhance indirect defense. Ecol Lett 16:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Latta RG (2009) Testing for local adaptation in Avena barbata: a classic example of ecotypic divergence. Mol Ecol 18:3781–3791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Latta RG, McCain C (2009) Path analysis of natural selection via survival and fecundity across contrasting environments in Avena barbata. J Evol Biol 22:2458–2469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levin DA (1973) The role of trichomes in plant defense. Q Rev Biol 48:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. LoPresti EF, Pearse IS, Charles GK (2015) The siren song of a sticky plant: columbines provision mutualist arthropods by attracting and killing passerby insects. Ecology 96:2862–2869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marquis RJ (1992) A bite is a bite is a bite? Constraints on response to folivory in Piper arieianum (Piperaceae). Ecology 73:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marshall DR, Jain SK (1969) Genetic polymorphism in natural populations of Avena fatua and A. barbata. Nature 221:276–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Massey FP, Ennos AR, Hartley SE (2006) Silica in grasses as a defence against insect herbivores: contrasting effects on folivores and a phloem feeder. J Anim Ecol 75:595–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mauricio R, Bowers MD, Bazzaz FA (1993) Pattern of leaf damage affects fitness of the annual plant Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Ecology 74:2066–2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McKinney KB (1938) Physical characteristics of the foliage of beans and tomatoes that tend to control some small insects. J Econ Entomol 31:630–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McNaughton SJ (1979) Grazing as an optimization process: grass ungulate relationships in the Serengeti. Am Nat 113:691–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McNaughton SJ, Tarrants JL (1983) Grass leaf silicification: natural selection for an inducible defense against herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci 80:790–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Metcalfe CR (1960) Anatomy of the monocotyledons. I. Gramineae. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer GA (1998) Pattern of defoliation and its effect on photosynthesis and growth of goldenrod. Funct Ecol 12:270–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore BD, Johnson SN (2017) Get tough, get toxic, or get a bodyguard: identifying candidate traits conferring belowground resistance to herbivores in grasses. Front Plant Sci 7:1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  31. Stuart W (1906) Disease resistance of potatoes. Utah Agric Exp Stn Bull 122:105–136Google Scholar
  32. van der Meijden E, Wijn M, Verkaar HJ (1988) Defense and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51:355–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vermeij GJ (2015) Plants that lead: do some surface features direct enemy traffic on leaves and stems? Biol J Linn Soc 116:288–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vicari M, Bazely DR (1993) Do grasses fight back? The case for antiherbivore defences. Trends Ecol Evol 8:137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Entomology and NematologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Planetary SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations